Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.



Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On 10/8/09 2:28 PM, jps wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.



Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html

Crikey...backwards assholes.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, jps wrote:


A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.



Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

Would the women involved be ashamed? Proud? What?

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Oct 8, 6:10*pm, John H Rant wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, jps wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.


of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.


of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits


Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...


What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.


of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits


Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


Sick mind you have there krause. How do you live with yourself?

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Oct 8, 7:07*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_....

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
*From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
*From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On 10/8/09 8:01 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people


Fear...that is what is behind this move in Oklahoma...making women fear
for their safety and lives.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Oct 8, 6:07*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_....

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
*From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Krausie, I thought you were at a Yale class reunion?