Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.



Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On 10/8/09 2:28 PM, jps wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.



Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html

Crikey...backwards assholes.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, jps wrote:


A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.



Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

Would the women involved be ashamed? Proud? What?

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Oct 8, 6:10*pm, John H Rant wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, jps wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.


of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.


of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits


Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...


What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.


of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits


Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


Sick mind you have there krause. How do you live with yourself?

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Oct 8, 7:07*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_....

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
*From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
*From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On 10/8/09 8:01 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people


Fear...that is what is behind this move in Oklahoma...making women fear
for their safety and lives.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Oct 8, 6:07*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_....

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
*From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Krausie, I thought you were at a Yale class reunion?

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

"John H Rant" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, jps wrote:


A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.



Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

Would the women involved be ashamed? Proud? What?




Yeah, you guys have a lot of gall to be friends of the fetus, but when it
finally pops out, you're gone.

http://www.traditionalmusic.co.uk/fo..._the_Fetus.htm


--
Nom=de=Plume

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H Rant wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, jps wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.


of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits


Men have no business insisting that a woman have or not have an abortion. No
one is in favor of abortion. No one. That's a right-wing, fear-mongering
canard.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.


Seconded... those places get bombed from time to time. I used to live
somewhat near one, and these guys were always marching back and forth with
disgusting placards and screaming obscenities. I find it hard to imagine
walking in there, but women did.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/8/09 8:01 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.


yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people


Fear...that is what is behind this move in Oklahoma...making women fear
for their safety and lives.


Exactly right.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

In article fa593c26-8960-460b-9a21-e6975df27fc6
@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com, says...

On Oct 8, 6:07*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
*From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Krausie, I thought you were at a Yale class reunion?

Still WHY THE **** ARE YOU DEALING WITH THIS BITCH?? Only thing wafa
would be good for is target practice.. He has added nothing to the world
but lies and hate.. **** him...

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Oct 8, 2:28*pm, jps wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

ironic in that OK ranks 50th in health care quality:

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Char...card-2009.aspx

just ahead of the right wing paradise of TX...

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Oct 8, 8:11*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Oct 8, 7:07*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:

On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."

The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
*From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.

of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just
incubators with tits

Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. *I applaud you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

thanks much...interesting times...

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On 10/8/09 9:58 PM, Tosk wrote:


Still WHY THE **** ARE YOU DEALING WITH THIS BITCH?? Only thing wafa
would be good for is target practice.. He has added nothing to the world
but lies and hate.. **** him...



Short people like you, Scott Ingersoll, have no reason to live.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...
What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...
What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On 10/9/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...
What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??




Apparently flajim is woman-less. Figures.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your
life...*is* is that a lack of anything going on??


As you guessed...should be *or*

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...
What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people
You have balls, sir. I applaud you.
How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??


You wouldn't understand.

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

H the K wrote:
On 10/9/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will
cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally
forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information"
will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice
argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions
that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to
prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women
who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your
life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??




Apparently flajim is woman-less. Figures.


Speak for your self Cella Dwella.

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

In article , says...

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...
What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people
You have balls, sir. I applaud you.
How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??


You wouldn't understand.

You guys crack me up.. JPS, from under his desk says he was a guard at a
clinic... Bull****, says "gunning down people left and right"
bull****... The guy is a proven bull****ter and is known for making up
stuff that suits his agenda, why even discuss his latest fiction
novel...?

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On 10/9/09 10:44 AM, Tosk wrote:


You guys crack me up.. JPS, from under his desk says he was a guard at a
clinic... Bull****, says "gunning down people left and right"
bull****... The guy is a proven bull****ter and is known for making up
stuff that suits his agenda, why even discuss his latest fiction
novel...?


Poor Lil' Scotty...


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:46:26 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 10:44 AM, Tosk wrote:


You guys crack me up.. JPS, from under his desk says he was a guard at a
clinic... Bull****, says "gunning down people left and right"
bull****... The guy is a proven bull****ter and is known for making up
stuff that suits his agenda, why even discuss his latest fiction
novel...?


Poor Lil' Scotty...

Holy ****. Can't even figure out attribution.

If you gave him a machine, he'd surely be the source of friendly fire.

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 18:59:45 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 2:28*pm, jps wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

ironic in that OK ranks 50th in health care quality:

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Char...card-2009.aspx

just ahead of the right wing paradise of TX...

Fantastic. Too bad good folks have to suffer through what the idiots
put in place.

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:37:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:46:26 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 10:44 AM, Tosk wrote:


You guys crack me up.. JPS, from under his desk says he was a guard at a
clinic... Bull****, says "gunning down people left and right"
bull****... The guy is a proven bull****ter and is known for making up
stuff that suits his agenda, why even discuss his latest fiction
novel...?


Poor Lil' Scotty...

Holy ****. Can't even figure out attribution.

If you gave him a machine, he'd surely be the source of friendly fire.

machine gun, that is.

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

Don White wrote:

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people
You have balls, sir. I applaud you.
How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??



Moron...

Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
 

H the K wrote:
On 10/9/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will
cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally
forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information"
will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice
argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions
that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to
prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women
who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your
life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??




Apparently flajim is woman-less. Figures.



"Apparently"? Where are your facts? Is this stupid statement based on
what a dumbass from Canada posted?

My bet is you only see Karen when she enters the basement to collect
your rent check.