jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...
What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

"Jim" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...
What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??

On 10/9/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...
What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??




Apparently flajim is woman-less. Figures.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

H the K wrote:
On 10/9/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will
cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally
forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information"
will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice
argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions
that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to
prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women
who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your
life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??




Apparently flajim is woman-less. Figures.


Speak for your self Cella Dwella.

H the K wrote:
On 10/9/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will
cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally
forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information"
will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice
argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions
that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to
prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...

What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women
who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people

You have balls, sir. I applaud you.

How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your
life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??




Apparently flajim is woman-less. Figures.



"Apparently"? Where are your facts? Is this stupid statement based on
what a dumbass from Canada posted?

My bet is you only see Karen when she enters the basement to collect
your rent check.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your
life...*is* is that a lack of anything going on??


As you guessed...should be *or*

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...
What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people
You have balls, sir. I applaud you.
How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??


You wouldn't understand.

In article , says...

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed
information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of
Health,
which will then post the collected data on a public website. The
controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost
$281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.
Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced
to reveal:
1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother
Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be
concerned
over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be
reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues,
"In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that
will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any
member
of a smaller community."
The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton
(D-Okla.),
and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent
this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the
grounds
that it violates the state's constitution.
Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_...
What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified?
From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal -
they're
just fetuses, after all.
of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just
incubators with tits
Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who
had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the
lunatic
right could shoot them.

yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers
were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people
You have balls, sir. I applaud you.
How sweet. One gay libber admiring another gay lib's testicles.

You're really into this sexual harassment thing.
First Ms Plume and now various men. Something going on in your life...is
is that a lack of anything going on??


You wouldn't understand.

You guys crack me up.. JPS, from under his desk says he was a guard at a
clinic... Bull****, says "gunning down people left and right"
bull****... The guy is a proven bull****ter and is known for making up
stuff that suits his agenda, why even discuss his latest fiction
novel...?

On 10/9/09 10:44 AM, Tosk wrote:


You guys crack me up.. JPS, from under his desk says he was a guard at a
clinic... Bull****, says "gunning down people left and right"
bull****... The guy is a proven bull****ter and is known for making up
stuff that suits his agenda, why even discuss his latest fiction
novel...?


Poor Lil' Scotty...


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:46:26 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 10:44 AM, Tosk wrote:


You guys crack me up.. JPS, from under his desk says he was a guard at a
clinic... Bull****, says "gunning down people left and right"
bull****... The guy is a proven bull****ter and is known for making up
stuff that suits his agenda, why even discuss his latest fiction
novel...?


Poor Lil' Scotty...

Holy ****. Can't even figure out attribution.

If you gave him a machine, he'd surely be the source of friendly fire.