Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m... If they had run a decent candidate, the running mate would not matter. And after the previous 4 years, no Republican was going to win. They won after 4, but screwed the pooch big time. And it seems the Dem's did not pay attention, as they are exceeding the screw ups of the last 4 years in the first 100 days. They should not look at guaranteed control of Congress in another year, or the Executive branch in 3. There are never any guarantees... -- Nom=de=Plume |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message m... If they had run a decent candidate, the running mate would not matter. And after the previous 4 years, no Republican was going to win. They won after 4, but screwed the pooch big time. And it seems the Dem's did not pay attention, as they are exceeding the screw ups of the last 4 years in the first 100 days. They should not look at guaranteed control of Congress in another year, or the Executive branch in 3. There are never any guarantees... -- Nom=de=Plume With their present record, there may be a guaranteed failure to get reelected as a majority. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:00:38 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message m... If they had run a decent candidate, the running mate would not matter. And after the previous 4 years, no Republican was going to win. They won after 4, but screwed the pooch big time. And it seems the Dem's did not pay attention, as they are exceeding the screw ups of the last 4 years in the first 100 days. They should not look at guaranteed control of Congress in another year, or the Executive branch in 3. There are never any guarantees... -- Nom=de=Plume With their present record, there may be a guaranteed failure to get reelected as a majority. What present record? Wishful thinking on your behalf. Our resident DINO. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:03:17 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:00:38 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message m... If they had run a decent candidate, the running mate would not matter. And after the previous 4 years, no Republican was going to win. They won after 4, but screwed the pooch big time. And it seems the Dem's did not pay attention, as they are exceeding the screw ups of the last 4 years in the first 100 days. They should not look at guaranteed control of Congress in another year, or the Executive branch in 3. There are never any guarantees... -- Nom=de=Plume With their present record, there may be a guaranteed failure to get reelected as a majority. What present record? Wishful thinking on your behalf. Our resident DINO. The question "are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?" will get asked and the answer will determine who gets elected. Currently, the answer is a big YES! The GOP will blame the Pelosi Reid congress for the 2007-present crash and the exploding deficit. They're going to blame anyone who's a Dem. and breathing. That is how elections always get framed. It might not be fair but politics seldom are. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:03:17 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:00:38 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message m... If they had run a decent candidate, the running mate would not matter. And after the previous 4 years, no Republican was going to win. They won after 4, but screwed the pooch big time. And it seems the Dem's did not pay attention, as they are exceeding the screw ups of the last 4 years in the first 100 days. They should not look at guaranteed control of Congress in another year, or the Executive branch in 3. There are never any guarantees... -- Nom=de=Plume With their present record, there may be a guaranteed failure to get reelected as a majority. What present record? Wishful thinking on your behalf. Our resident DINO. The question "are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?" will get asked and the answer will determine who gets elected. Currently, the answer is a big YES! The GOP will blame the Pelosi Reid congress for the 2007-present crash and the exploding deficit. They're going to blame anyone who's a Dem. and breathing. That is how elections always get framed. It might not be fair but politics seldom are. -- Nom=de=Plume a lot aren't. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another gorgeous day on the Potomac | General | |||
Great day on the Potomac | General | |||
Cruise up the Potomac | Cruising | |||
Star kayaker Adam van Koeverden to carry flag in Beijing for Canada | General | |||
Star kayaker Adam van Koeverden to carry flag in Beijing for Canada | General |