View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
nom=de=plume nom=de=plume is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Beijing on the Potomac

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:03:17 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:00:38 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
If they had run a decent candidate, the running mate would not matter.
And after the previous 4 years, no Republican was going to win. They
won
after 4, but screwed the pooch big time. And it seems the Dem's did
not
pay attention, as they are exceeding the screw ups of the last 4 years
in
the first 100 days. They should not look at guaranteed control of
Congress in another year, or the Executive branch in 3.


There are never any guarantees...

--
Nom=de=Plume


With their present record, there may be a guaranteed failure to get
reelected as a majority.


What present record? Wishful thinking on your behalf. Our resident
DINO.


The question "are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?" will
get asked and the answer will determine who gets elected.


Currently, the answer is a big YES!


The GOP will blame the Pelosi Reid congress for the 2007-present
crash and the exploding deficit.


They're going to blame anyone who's a Dem. and breathing.

That is how elections always get framed. It might not be fair but
politics seldom are.




--
Nom=de=Plume