|
Clunker Math
"John H." wrote in message
... Sure is easy for you to morph from nuclear power to city's poor. Another tactic to distract from the facts? The 'morphing' was from problem solving to problem solving. I think maybe you exercised the scissors again. You can't seem to stay focused. We were talking about nukes and previously clunkers, then you attempted a strawman argument about inner-city poor. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Clunker Math
"John H." wrote in message
... The real solution is to stop eating so much meat. That would have an immediate and positive effect. The other things take years. LOL, but I don't think you meant that as a joke.The liberal 'that takes years' excuse has been in use for years. It's getting old. Certainly no joke. Cows and such make up the bulk of the greenhouse gas problem. Besides, the conditions that they are raised in are horrible. Who would want to eat a cow after visiting a traditional stockyard? Someone once said that it's better for the environment to eat a veggie burger in a Hummer than a burger in a Prius. Do you believe that putting a significant number of new nuke plants online is going to happen in less than a decade? Not that moving people from eating so much meat is fast process either, but the benefits are much greater and not just for oil consumption. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Clunker Math
wrote in message
... On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 23:40:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Hate to break it to you, but most of the usable parts of the clunkers were salvaged before the shredding. There was some loss to the secondary car sales market, since they were removed from the mix. Not around here. Whole cars were shredded and loaded into hopper cars destined for China. In that case, they threw out stuff that they didn't need to do according to the regs. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Clunker Math
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:45:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Sure is easy for you to morph from nuclear power to city's poor. Another tactic to distract from the facts? The 'morphing' was from problem solving to problem solving. I think maybe you exercised the scissors again. You can't seem to stay focused. We were talking about nukes and previously clunkers, then you attempted a strawman argument about inner-city poor. Watch... -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Clunker Math
"John H." wrote in message
... On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:45:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. Sure is easy for you to morph from nuclear power to city's poor. Another tactic to distract from the facts? The 'morphing' was from problem solving to problem solving. I think maybe you exercised the scissors again. You can't seem to stay focused. We were talking about nukes and previously clunkers, then you attempted a strawman argument about inner-city poor. Watch... Careful. That's too close to witch. I might be offended, given I'm a liberal. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Clunker Math
|
Clunker Math
|
Clunker Math
|
Clunker Math
No. The point is that Obama's administration has put into place a lot more accountability. ROTFLOL.... Right, accountability!? That's funny... |
Clunker Math
nom=de=plume wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message ... It's not a complete solution or even a good partial solution. It takes years to build power plants, and there's always the spent fuel problem. Every day you delay the building of nuclear plants is another day the citizens of the USA are sending money overseas for energy or burning coal and oil. True enough. When are you going to get serious about the actual problems. When are you going to stop talking about the problem and start taking action. The real solution is to stop eating so much meat. That would have an immediate and positive effect. The other things take years. It will cost you three or four times as much in energy to replace the animal protein with plant protein. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com