Clunker Math
 

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:27:37 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
I reject that argument. It's just another label. The point is that the
money
Obama is spending for the economic recovery (the nearly failed economy
being
easily laid at Bush's door) and has so far been shown not to be a waste.

Reject away. You attempted to justify 'Bama's acts by comparing him to
Bush. The failed economy is easily laid at the door of Chris and
Barney. But...


So, now you're blaming Frank and Dodd? I thought is was Obama's fault.

Pot, kettle, black.

You just foolishly laid it at Bush's door.

When you say Frank, Dodd, and Obama and then Pot, kettle, black, I
think you're being racist.

Harry will get you for a lot less than that!
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

Clunker Math
 

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:28:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:36:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
How have the stupid, friggin' French managed to do so well, Gene?
Perhaps you should do a little reading on the new technology available
for dealing with nuclear waste.


I guess you forgot about the right's deepseated hatred for all things
French. Got any fries?

Nope, not all things. I like their sensibility about the use of
nuclear power, and I like many of the works by Michel Delacroix.
Croissants fresh from the campsite owner's oven were a real treat.
Paying over $10 for two cokes at Sacré-Coeur Basilica was hard to
take. But, the kids were thirsty.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.


So, the Freedom Fries were just an left-wing plot to confuse us?

Whatever you say.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

Clunker Math
 

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:26:37 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
.. .
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
"Waste" implys that bama can account for the money he so frivolously
throws around. Most of the bailout money just vaporized into thin air.
Does anyone know where all that automaker bailout money? Even more
difficult to trace is the financial industry bailout. I wonder if those
executives ever got their bonuses. The clunker program hasn't done so
well either. Mis management of the program has left the dealers holding
the empty bag. Hopefully they will eventually get paid.


Hate to tell you, but the first bank bailout happened during Bush's
administration. Are you going to blame the president for that too?

Why didn't bama learn from Bushes mistake and demand some accountability
instead of making the same mistake again?


Having trouble spelling? It's "O"bama. There's much more accountability in
the more recent bailouts.

We don't want to get confused with Hosanna and Obama, so 'Bama is a
good way to go.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

Clunker Math
 

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:25:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
Hate to tell you, but the first bank bailout happened during Bush's
administration. Are you going to blame the president for that too?

You skipped the main point. 'Bama is wasting money as fast as he can.

--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.


You missed the main point. It's been shown to have worked, and it's
continuing to help.

Snipping is a dishonest Krause trick. Cute, but dishonest.

"Waste" implys that bama can account for the money he so frivolously
throws around. Most of the bailout money just vaporized into thin air.

That was the point.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

Clunker Math
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
You missed the main point. It's been shown to have worked, and it's
continuing to help.

Snipping is a dishonest Krause trick. Cute, but dishonest.

No, it's to save space. You continually attack people rather than have an
honest discusion. I did nothing dishonest, and I'm not Krause . don't even
know him.


"Waste" implys that bama can account for the money he so frivolously
throws around. Most of the bailout money just vaporized into thin air.

That was the point.

No. The point is that Obama's administration has put into place a lot more
accountability. If you don't see that, then this discussion is pointless.
You're contantly attacking people vs. ideas. That's dishonest and not at all
cute.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Clunker Math
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
Having trouble spelling? It's "O"bama. There's much more accountability
in the more recent bailouts.

Maybe he's starting to catch on. Let's "hope" so. I still think he's
throwing gobs of money into the air and "hopes" it lands in the right
places. "Change" is a comin. Lets "hope" it doesn't trample us all when it
does.


What should catch on? Racist language and implication? That ship has sailed,
unfortunately.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Clunker Math
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
Having trouble spelling? It's "O"bama. There's much more accountability in
the more recent bailouts.

We don't want to get confused with Hosanna and Obama, so 'Bama is a
good way to go.

You mean you don't want to get confused. For most people, it's pretty clear
what you mean, btw.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Clunker Math
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
Reject away. You attempted to justify 'Bama's acts by comparing him to
Bush. The failed economy is easily laid at the door of Chris and
Barney. But...


So, now you're blaming Frank and Dodd? I thought is was Obama's fault.

Pot, kettle, black.

You just foolishly laid it at Bush's door.

When you say Frank, Dodd, and Obama and then Pot, kettle, black, I
think you're being racist.

Harry will get you for a lot less than that!


I accurately laid it at Bush's door. Believe what you want! You and your
friends here seem to think that racism is funny or can be dismissed as such.
Comments like this are, unfortunately, typical of those who would rather
create fear and mistrust vs. have an intelligent discussion of the important
issues.


--
Nom=de=Plume

Clunker Math
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
So, the Freedom Fries were just an left-wing plot to confuse us?

Whatever you say.


So, you have nothing to say about that little ditty. Ok, whatever I say!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Clunker Math
 

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:33:29 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
It's not a complete solution or even a good partial solution. It takes
years
to build power plants, and there's always the spent fuel problem.

Liberals have been saying that for years. Go read up on the new
technology for dealing with nuclear waste.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,318688,00.html
Yeah, it came from Fox News, but you wouldn't expect the liberal media
to mention it, would you?

Hmmm.... a tool of the Heritage Foundation. No mention of that in the
article. As to the merits of reprocessing, if it can be done safely, I'm all
for it.

What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty
rate all have in common? Democrat mayors.


Sure is easy for you to morph from nuclear power to city's poor. Another
tactic to distract from the facts?

The 'morphing' was from problem solving to problem solving. I think
maybe you exercised the scissors again.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.