| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... Stupid scientists! Apparently they aren't listening to the people that really know and understand this stuff, conservative politicians and Rush! If they did, they'd know that despite evidence, this isn't happeneing: http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...USTRALIA-REEF/ Nobody doubts it happening, we just are listening to the other half of he worlds scientists, who don't agree it's our fault and Mercury filled green bulbs and ugly little cars are the solution... No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming think it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
|
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming think Although I agree with the statement so far.... Anyway, there in lies the problem.. Most "scientists who are studying global taxing" are deeply vested in the economics of studying the issue. That is to say, if there is no Global Taxing, they are out of work... snerk... I'm guessing in your eyes, just the ones that know and realize that it is happening. it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. It's a shame the DNC chooses to heed the words of a very few "however vocal" scientists that have a "green" agenda rather than listen to the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. A "few"?????? Are you serious? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
In article ,
says... On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:38:07 -0400, JustWait penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |In article , |says... | | No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming | think | |Although I agree with the statement so far.... Anyway, there in lies the |problem.. Most "scientists who are studying global taxing" are deeply |vested in the economics of studying the issue. That is to say, if there |is no Global Taxing, they are out of work... snerk... | | it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing | into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words | of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to | the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. | |It's a shame the DNC chooses to heed the words of a very few "however |vocal" scientists that have a "green" agenda rather than listen to the |WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. Your talking points are showing, but they are fairly devoid of facts. Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists surveyed believe ?global average temperatures have increased? during the past century. Eighty-four percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring, and 74% agree that ?currently available scientific evidence? substantiates its occurrence. Only 5% believe that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure. http://stats.org/stories/2008/global..._apr23_08.html I would like to see a list of "climate scientists" stacked up against the amount of grants they are receiving to do the research... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:38:07 -0400, JustWait penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |In article , |says... | | No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming | think | |Although I agree with the statement so far.... Anyway, there in lies the |problem.. Most "scientists who are studying global taxing" are deeply |vested in the economics of studying the issue. That is to say, if there |is no Global Taxing, they are out of work... snerk... | | it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing | into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words | of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to | the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. | |It's a shame the DNC chooses to heed the words of a very few "however |vocal" scientists that have a "green" agenda rather than listen to the |WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. Your talking points are showing, but they are fairly devoid of facts. Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists surveyed believe ?global average temperatures have increased? during the past century. Eighty-four percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring, and 74% agree that ?currently available scientific evidence? substantiates its occurrence. Only 5% believe that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure. http://stats.org/stories/2008/global..._apr23_08.html I would like to see a list of "climate scientists" stacked up against the amount of grants they are receiving to do the research... What would an intellectual numnutz like you do with such a list? You didn't even have the skills to hang onto a warehouse job...now you want to judge the credentials of scientists? |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:30:35 -0400, JustWait
wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:38:07 -0400, JustWait penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |In article , |says... | | No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming | think | |Although I agree with the statement so far.... Anyway, there in lies the |problem.. Most "scientists who are studying global taxing" are deeply |vested in the economics of studying the issue. That is to say, if there |is no Global Taxing, they are out of work... snerk... | | it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing | into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words | of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to | the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. | |It's a shame the DNC chooses to heed the words of a very few "however |vocal" scientists that have a "green" agenda rather than listen to the |WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. Your talking points are showing, but they are fairly devoid of facts. Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists surveyed believe ?global average temperatures have increased? during the past century. Eighty-four percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring, and 74% agree that ?currently available scientific evidence? substantiates its occurrence. Only 5% believe that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure. http://stats.org/stories/2008/global..._apr23_08.html I would like to see a list of "climate scientists" stacked up against the amount of grants they are receiving to do the research... Exactly. I didn't see that as one of the questions. It's surely pertinent. -- Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist" John H |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:30:35 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:38:07 -0400, JustWait penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |In article , |says... | | No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming | think | |Although I agree with the statement so far.... Anyway, there in lies the |problem.. Most "scientists who are studying global taxing" are deeply |vested in the economics of studying the issue. That is to say, if there |is no Global Taxing, they are out of work... snerk... | | it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing | into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words | of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to | the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. | |It's a shame the DNC chooses to heed the words of a very few "however |vocal" scientists that have a "green" agenda rather than listen to the |WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. Your talking points are showing, but they are fairly devoid of facts. Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists surveyed believe ?global average temperatures have increased? during the past century. Eighty-four percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring, and 74% agree that ?currently available scientific evidence? substantiates its occurrence. Only 5% believe that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure. http://stats.org/stories/2008/global..._apr23_08.html I would like to see a list of "climate scientists" stacked up against the amount of grants they are receiving to do the research... Exactly. I didn't see that as one of the questions. It's surely pertinent. -- And I'd like to see a list of anti-global warming scientists stacked up against the amount of grants THEY receive. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:53:52 -0400, NotNow wrote:
John H. wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:30:35 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:38:07 -0400, JustWait penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |In article , |says... | | No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming | think | |Although I agree with the statement so far.... Anyway, there in lies the |problem.. Most "scientists who are studying global taxing" are deeply |vested in the economics of studying the issue. That is to say, if there |is no Global Taxing, they are out of work... snerk... | | it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing | into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words | of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to | the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. | |It's a shame the DNC chooses to heed the words of a very few "however |vocal" scientists that have a "green" agenda rather than listen to the |WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. Your talking points are showing, but they are fairly devoid of facts. Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists surveyed believe ?global average temperatures have increased? during the past century. Eighty-four percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring, and 74% agree that ?currently available scientific evidence? substantiates its occurrence. Only 5% believe that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure. http://stats.org/stories/2008/global..._apr23_08.html I would like to see a list of "climate scientists" stacked up against the amount of grants they are receiving to do the research... Exactly. I didn't see that as one of the questions. It's surely pertinent. -- And I'd like to see a list of anti-global warming scientists stacked up against the amount of grants THEY receive. Now *that's* pretty funny! -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
In article ,
says... John H. wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:30:35 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:38:07 -0400, JustWait penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |In article , |says... | | No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming | think | |Although I agree with the statement so far.... Anyway, there in lies the |problem.. Most "scientists who are studying global taxing" are deeply |vested in the economics of studying the issue. That is to say, if there |is no Global Taxing, they are out of work... snerk... | | it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing | into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words | of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to | the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. | |It's a shame the DNC chooses to heed the words of a very few "however |vocal" scientists that have a "green" agenda rather than listen to the |WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. Your talking points are showing, but they are fairly devoid of facts. Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists surveyed believe ?global average temperatures have increased? during the past century. Eighty-four percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring, and 74% agree that ?currently available scientific evidence? substantiates its occurrence. Only 5% believe that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure. http://stats.org/stories/2008/global..._apr23_08.html I would like to see a list of "climate scientists" stacked up against the amount of grants they are receiving to do the research... Exactly. I didn't see that as one of the questions. It's surely pertinent. -- And I'd like to see a list of anti-global warming scientists stacked up against the amount of grants THEY receive. Me too. Who is funding them? We know George Soros, and the UN are funding the advocates... And of course we know the UN is about as dependable as a junkie with a fresh bag... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| This can't be happening! | General | |||
| It's happening! | ASA | |||
| Accidents Happening | General | |||
| Happening soon in the USA? | General | |||
| What's happening in Ft Myers FL ? | Cruising | |||
Hybrid Mode
