|
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
Stupid scientists! Apparently they aren't listening to the people that
really know and understand this stuff, conservative politicians and Rush! If they did, they'd know that despite evidence, this isn't happeneing: http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...USTRALIA-REEF/ |
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... Stupid scientists! Apparently they aren't listening to the people that really know and understand this stuff, conservative politicians and Rush! If they did, they'd know that despite evidence, this isn't happeneing: http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...USTRALIA-REEF/ Nobody doubts it happening, we just are listening to the other half of he worlds scientists, who don't agree it's our fault and Mercury filled green bulbs and ugly little cars are the solution... No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming think it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. |
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... Stupid scientists! Apparently they aren't listening to the people that really know and understand this stuff, conservative politicians and Rush! If they did, they'd know that despite evidence, this isn't happeneing: http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...USTRALIA-REEF/ Nobody doubts it happening, we just are listening to the other half of he worlds scientists, who don't agree it's our fault and Mercury filled green bulbs and ugly little cars are the solution... Half? Moron. |
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
|
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
In article ,
says... On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:38:07 -0400, JustWait penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |In article , |says... | | No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming | think | |Although I agree with the statement so far.... Anyway, there in lies the |problem.. Most "scientists who are studying global taxing" are deeply |vested in the economics of studying the issue. That is to say, if there |is no Global Taxing, they are out of work... snerk... | | it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing | into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words | of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to | the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. | |It's a shame the DNC chooses to heed the words of a very few "however |vocal" scientists that have a "green" agenda rather than listen to the |WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. Your talking points are showing, but they are fairly devoid of facts. Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists surveyed believe ?global average temperatures have increased? during the past century. Eighty-four percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring, and 74% agree that ?currently available scientific evidence? substantiates its occurrence. Only 5% believe that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure. http://stats.org/stories/2008/global..._apr23_08.html I would like to see a list of "climate scientists" stacked up against the amount of grants they are receiving to do the research... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:38:07 -0400, JustWait penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |In article , |says... | | No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming | think | |Although I agree with the statement so far.... Anyway, there in lies the |problem.. Most "scientists who are studying global taxing" are deeply |vested in the economics of studying the issue. That is to say, if there |is no Global Taxing, they are out of work... snerk... | | it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing | into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words | of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to | the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. | |It's a shame the DNC chooses to heed the words of a very few "however |vocal" scientists that have a "green" agenda rather than listen to the |WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. Your talking points are showing, but they are fairly devoid of facts. Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists surveyed believe ?global average temperatures have increased? during the past century. Eighty-four percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring, and 74% agree that ?currently available scientific evidence? substantiates its occurrence. Only 5% believe that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure. http://stats.org/stories/2008/global..._apr23_08.html I would like to see a list of "climate scientists" stacked up against the amount of grants they are receiving to do the research... What would an intellectual numnutz like you do with such a list? You didn't even have the skills to hang onto a warehouse job...now you want to judge the credentials of scientists? |
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
Gene wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:38:07 -0400, JustWait penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |In article , |says... | | No where NEAR "half" of scientists that are studying global warming | think | |Although I agree with the statement so far.... Anyway, there in lies the |problem.. Most "scientists who are studying global taxing" are deeply |vested in the economics of studying the issue. That is to say, if there |is no Global Taxing, they are out of work... snerk... | | it has nothing to do with the greenhouse gases that man is spewing | into the atmosphere. It's amazing that the GOP chooses to heed the words | of a very few scientists that have a GOP agenda rather than listen to | the WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. | |It's a shame the DNC chooses to heed the words of a very few "however |vocal" scientists that have a "green" agenda rather than listen to the |WHOLE STORY and then make an intelligent decision. Your talking points are showing, but they are fairly devoid of facts. Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists surveyed believe “global average temperatures have increased” during the past century. Eighty-four percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring, and 74% agree that “currently available scientific evidence” substantiates its occurrence. Only 5% believe that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure. http://stats.org/stories/2008/global..._apr23_08.html "Climate" Scientists Agree on Warming, Disagree on Dangers, and Don’t Trust the Media’s Coverage of Climate Change If man has had any effects of the changing climate, it is in the form of paved streets, parking lots, asphalt roofs, etc. not "Greenhouse Gases" (I suspect the gases coming from the white house and democrats in congress are doing more damage than greenhouse gases) If you will look at the long term science studies like paleontology and archeology, you will see that the temperatures current earth climate are at a peak that has periodically occurred over the last several hundreds of thousand years. If we had any thing to fear from the climate it would be significant drops in temperature not warming as shown by those studies. |
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:09:55 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Stupid scientists! Apparently they aren't listening to the people that really know and understand this stuff, conservative politicians and Rush! If they did, they'd know that despite evidence, this isn't happeneing: http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...USTRALIA-REEF/ Pesky little facts - they just keep getting in the way don't they? "The five-yearly reef outlook report, aimed at benchmarking the health of the reef, found climate change, declining water quality from coastal runoff, development and illegal fishing were the biggest dangers to the reef." Let's dissect that paragraph: 1 - Climate Change - check. 2 - Polluted water runoff - check. 3 - Development - check. 4 - Illegal fishing - check. One out of four - that's 25% of the total problem. If I were looking at this, I might think that there are a lot more problems with the reef than just climate change. Why one could almost believe that if the other 75% of the problems were solved, then maybe the reef might survive. Here's an interesting little blurb: "The report, prepared by Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority scientists, says damage will occur from issues such as climate change, nutrient overload and over-fishing but, if well managed, the ecosystem should survive better than most other reefs." Hmmm - nutrient overload and over-fishing. 2/3rds of the problem. Wonder how that would affect the health of the reef if those were solved? http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...1-3102,00.html But wait - there's more!!! http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/corp_site/k...nfluences.html Read the non-global warming parts - very interesting. In particular the part about shipping: groundings, ballast discharge, oil spills, litter and sewage discharge. It would appear that "global warming" plays a very minor role in the problems facing the Great Barrier Reef. But wait - there's more!!! http://exoticanimallover.com/2009/02...-barrier-reef/ Pesky little critter huh? Ah science - gotta love it. |
Don't these scientists know this isn't happening?
In article ,
says... On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:09:55 -0400, NotNow wrote: Stupid scientists! Apparently they aren't listening to the people that really know and understand this stuff, conservative politicians and Rush! If they did, they'd know that despite evidence, this isn't happeneing: http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...USTRALIA-REEF/ Pesky little facts - they just keep getting in the way don't they? "The five-yearly reef outlook report, aimed at benchmarking the health of the reef, found climate change, declining water quality from coastal runoff, development and illegal fishing were the biggest dangers to the reef." Let's dissect that paragraph: 1 - Climate Change - check. 2 - Polluted water runoff - check. 3 - Development - check. 4 - Illegal fishing - check. One out of four - that's 25% of the total problem. If I were looking at this, I might think that there are a lot more problems with the reef than just climate change. Why one could almost believe that if the other 75% of the problems were solved, then maybe the reef might survive. Here's an interesting little blurb: "The report, prepared by Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority scientists, says damage will occur from issues such as climate change, nutrient overload and over-fishing but, if well managed, the ecosystem should survive better than most other reefs." Hmmm - nutrient overload and over-fishing. 2/3rds of the problem. Wonder how that would affect the health of the reef if those were solved? http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...1-3102,00.html But wait - there's more!!! http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/corp_site/k...nfluences.html Read the non-global warming parts - very interesting. In particular the part about shipping: groundings, ballast discharge, oil spills, litter and sewage discharge. It would appear that "global warming" plays a very minor role in the problems facing the Great Barrier Reef. But wait - there's more!!! http://exoticanimallover.com/2009/02...-barrier-reef/ Pesky little critter huh? Ah science - gotta love it. Boy, great post and I bet it took a lot more work than just spewing bumper sticker ads saying "most scientists, settled science, etc...". -- Wafa free since 2009 |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com