On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:


"Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass"

Looking at the land mass question that is easy. obama's support is
principally in the coastal cities. Washington north to Boston. and Los
Angles north to San Francisco. Chicago which is still controlled by the
Daley machine we could toss in.

Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the
majority of the US House.

Dream on. You forget that land doesn't vote. You also forget how
damaged the Republican Party is. From this map, it looks like you can
have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party-
affiliation.aspx

Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all
those surrounding blue states. Good luck making a go of it.

thunder wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:


"Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass"

Looking at the land mass question that is easy. obama's support is
principally in the coastal cities. Washington north to Boston. and Los
Angles north to San Francisco. Chicago which is still controlled by the
Daley machine we could toss in.

Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the
majority of the US House.

Dream on. You forget that land doesn't vote. You also forget how
damaged the Republican Party is. From this map, it looks like you can
have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party-
affiliation.aspx

Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all
those surrounding blue states. Good luck making a go of it.


What's even funnier...the right-wing assholes can't get along with
anyone, so they'd shoot their wad by warring with each other. Imagine
the fights they'd have over whose state religion is the true state religion.

On Aug 28, 6:50*pm, H the K wrote:
thunder wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:

"Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass"

Looking at the land mass question that is easy. *obama's support is
principally in the coastal cities. *Washington north to Boston. *and Los
Angles north to San Francisco. *Chicago which is still controlled by the
Daley machine we could toss in.

Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the
majority of the US House.

Dream on. *You forget that land doesn't vote. *You also forget how
damaged the Republican Party is. *From this map, it looks like you can
have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more. *

http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party-
affiliation.aspx

Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all
those surrounding blue states. *Good luck making a go of it.

What's even funnier...the right-wing assholes can't get along with
anyone, so they'd shoot their wad by warring with each other. Imagine
the fights they'd have over whose state religion is the true state religion.

yeah can you imagine the right wing catholics trying to get the vote
under a right wing protestant govt like south carolina used to have?

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:


"Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass"

Looking at the land mass question that is easy. obama's support is
principally in the coastal cities. Washington north to Boston. and Los
Angles north to San Francisco. Chicago which is still controlled by the
Daley machine we could toss in.

Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the
majority of the US House.

Dream on. You forget that land doesn't vote. You also forget how
damaged the Republican Party is. From this map, it looks like you can
have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party-
affiliation.aspx

Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all
those surrounding blue states. Good luck making a go of it.

This reply is an example of reason for a divorce - Liberals and Dims have no
sense of humor.

Lu Powell wrote:

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:


"Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass"

Looking at the land mass question that is easy. obama's support is
principally in the coastal cities. Washington north to Boston. and Los
Angles north to San Francisco. Chicago which is still controlled by the
Daley machine we could toss in.

Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the
majority of the US House.

Dream on. You forget that land doesn't vote. You also forget how
damaged the Republican Party is. From this map, it looks like you can
have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party-
affiliation.aspx

Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all
those surrounding blue states. Good luck making a go of it.

This reply is an example of reason for a divorce - Liberals and Dims
have no sense of humor.


Every post of yours I read makes me laugh...but at you.

On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:24:52 -0400, Lu Powell wrote:


This reply is an example of reason for a divorce - Liberals and Dims
have no sense of humor.

Yeah, the Civil War was a regular laugh riot. Hey, I'm fully aware that
seceding is very far fetched, but secessionists are out there. Just
recently, we had a Vice Presidential candidate's spouse who was, at one
time, a member of a secessionist party.

On Aug 28, 7:24*pm, "Lu Powell" wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message

t...



On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:

"Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass"

Looking at the land mass question that is easy. *obama's support is
principally in the coastal cities. *Washington north to Boston. *and Los
Angles north to San Francisco. *Chicago which is still controlled by the
Daley machine we could toss in.

Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the
majority of the US House.

Dream on. *You forget that land doesn't vote. *You also forget how
damaged the Republican Party is. *From this map, it looks like you can
have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party-
affiliation.aspx

Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all
those surrounding blue states. *Good luck making a go of it.

This reply is an example of reason for a divorce - Liberals and Dims have no
sense of humor.

it's not a matter of having a sense of humor..its having a sense of
irony...which rednecks lack