Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DIVORCE AGREEMENT
THIS IS SO WELL PUT AND ALLEGEDLY BY A YOUNG PERSON, A STUDENT!!! WHATEVER HE RUNS FOR, I'LL VOTE FOR HIM. American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters, et al: We have stuck together since the late 1950's, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has run its course. Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way. Here is a model separation agreement: Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes. We don't like redistributive taxes so you can keep them.. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU. Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell (You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them). We'll keep the capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street. You can have your beloved homeless, homeboys, hippies and illegal aliens. We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO's and rednecks. We'll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood .. You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us.. You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help provide them security. We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values.. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N. but we will no longer be paying the bill. We'll keep the SUVs, pickup trucks and oversized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find. You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors. We'll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right. We'll keep The Battle Hymn of the Republic and the National Anthem. I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute Imagine, I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing, Kum Ba Ya or We Are the World. We'll practice trickle down economics and you can give trickle up poverty your best shot. Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name and our flag. Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other like minded liberal and conservative patriots and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I'll let you answer which one of us will need whose help in 15 years. Sincerely, John J. Wall Law Student and an American P.S. Also, please take Ted Turner, Sean Penn, Martin Sheen, Barbara Streisand, & Jane Fonda with you. P. S. S. And we won't have to press 1 for English. -- "Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others." - Ayn Rand |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lu Powell wrote:
DIVORCE AGREEMENT THIS IS SO WELL PUT AND ALLEGEDLY BY A YOUNG PERSON, A STUDENT!!! WHATEVER HE RUNS FOR, I'LL VOTE FOR HIM. American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters, et al: We have stuck together since the late 1950's, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has run its course. Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way. Here is a model separation agreement: Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes. We don't like redistributive taxes so you can keep them.. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU. Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell (You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them). We'll keep the capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street. You can have your beloved homeless, homeboys, hippies and illegal aliens. We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO's and rednecks. We'll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood .. You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us.. You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help provide them security. We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values.. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N. but we will no longer be paying the bill. We'll keep the SUVs, pickup trucks and oversized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find. You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors. We'll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right. We'll keep The Battle Hymn of the Republic and the National Anthem. I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute Imagine, I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing, Kum Ba Ya or We Are the World. We'll practice trickle down economics and you can give trickle up poverty your best shot. Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name and our flag. Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other like minded liberal and conservative patriots and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I'll let you answer which one of us will need whose help in 15 years. Sincerely, John J. Wall Law Student and an American P.S. Also, please take Ted Turner, Sean Penn, Martin Sheen, Barbara Streisand, & Jane Fonda with you. P. S. S. And we won't have to press 1 for English. -- "Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others." - Ayn Rand "Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass" Looking at the land mass question that is easy. obama's support is principally in the coastal cities. Washington north to Boston. and Los Angles north to San Francisco. Chicago which is still controlled by the Daley machine we could toss in. Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the majority of the US House. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:
"Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass" Looking at the land mass question that is easy. obama's support is principally in the coastal cities. Washington north to Boston. and Los Angles north to San Francisco. Chicago which is still controlled by the Daley machine we could toss in. Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the majority of the US House. Dream on. You forget that land doesn't vote. You also forget how damaged the Republican Party is. From this map, it looks like you can have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more. http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party- affiliation.aspx Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all those surrounding blue states. Good luck making a go of it. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thunder wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: "Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass" Looking at the land mass question that is easy. obama's support is principally in the coastal cities. Washington north to Boston. and Los Angles north to San Francisco. Chicago which is still controlled by the Daley machine we could toss in. Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the majority of the US House. Dream on. You forget that land doesn't vote. You also forget how damaged the Republican Party is. From this map, it looks like you can have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more. http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party- affiliation.aspx Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all those surrounding blue states. Good luck making a go of it. What's even funnier...the right-wing assholes can't get along with anyone, so they'd shoot their wad by warring with each other. Imagine the fights they'd have over whose state religion is the true state religion. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 6:50*pm, H the K wrote:
thunder wrote: On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: "Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass" Looking at the land mass question that is easy. *obama's support is principally in the coastal cities. *Washington north to Boston. *and Los Angles north to San Francisco. *Chicago which is still controlled by the Daley machine we could toss in. Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the majority of the US House. Dream on. *You forget that land doesn't vote. *You also forget how damaged the Republican Party is. *From this map, it looks like you can have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more. * http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party- affiliation.aspx Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all those surrounding blue states. *Good luck making a go of it. What's even funnier...the right-wing assholes can't get along with anyone, so they'd shoot their wad by warring with each other. Imagine the fights they'd have over whose state religion is the true state religion. yeah can you imagine the right wing catholics trying to get the vote under a right wing protestant govt like south carolina used to have? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message t... On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: "Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass" Looking at the land mass question that is easy. obama's support is principally in the coastal cities. Washington north to Boston. and Los Angles north to San Francisco. Chicago which is still controlled by the Daley machine we could toss in. Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the majority of the US House. Dream on. You forget that land doesn't vote. You also forget how damaged the Republican Party is. From this map, it looks like you can have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more. http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party- affiliation.aspx Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all those surrounding blue states. Good luck making a go of it. This reply is an example of reason for a divorce - Liberals and Dims have no sense of humor. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lu Powell wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message t... On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: "Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass" Looking at the land mass question that is easy. obama's support is principally in the coastal cities. Washington north to Boston. and Los Angles north to San Francisco. Chicago which is still controlled by the Daley machine we could toss in. Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the majority of the US House. Dream on. You forget that land doesn't vote. You also forget how damaged the Republican Party is. From this map, it looks like you can have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more. http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party- affiliation.aspx Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all those surrounding blue states. Good luck making a go of it. This reply is an example of reason for a divorce - Liberals and Dims have no sense of humor. Every post of yours I read makes me laugh...but at you. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:24:52 -0400, Lu Powell wrote:
This reply is an example of reason for a divorce - Liberals and Dims have no sense of humor. Yeah, the Civil War was a regular laugh riot. Hey, I'm fully aware that seceding is very far fetched, but secessionists are out there. Just recently, we had a Vice Presidential candidate's spouse who was, at one time, a member of a secessionist party. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 7:24*pm, "Lu Powell" wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message t... On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: "Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass" Looking at the land mass question that is easy. *obama's support is principally in the coastal cities. *Washington north to Boston. *and Los Angles north to San Francisco. *Chicago which is still controlled by the Daley machine we could toss in. Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the majority of the US House. Dream on. *You forget that land doesn't vote. *You also forget how damaged the Republican Party is. *From this map, it looks like you can have Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Alaska, and Nebraska, no more. http://www.gallup.com/poll/114016/st...litical-party- affiliation.aspx Definitely pretty country, but you will be depending on tourism from all those surrounding blue states. *Good luck making a go of it. This reply is an example of reason for a divorce - Liberals and Dims have no sense of humor. it's not a matter of having a sense of humor..its having a sense of irony...which rednecks lack |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 5:42*pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:
Lu Powell wrote: DIVORCE AGREEMENT THIS IS SO WELL PUT AND ALLEGEDLY BY A YOUNG PERSON, A STUDENT!!! WHATEVER HE RUNS FOR, I'LL VOTE FOR HIM. American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters, et al: We have stuck together since the late 1950's, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has run its course. Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way. Here is a model separation agreement: Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes. We don't like redistributive taxes so you can keep them.. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU. Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell (You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them). We'll keep the capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street. You can have your beloved homeless, homeboys, hippies and illegal aliens. We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO's and rednecks. We'll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood .. You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us.. You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help provide them security. We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values.. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N. but we will no longer be paying the bill. We'll keep the SUVs, pickup trucks and oversized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find. You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors.. We'll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right. We'll keep The Battle Hymn of the Republic and the National Anthem. I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute Imagine, I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing, Kum Ba Ya or We Are the World. We'll practice trickle down economics and you can give trickle up poverty your best shot. Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name and our flag. Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other like minded liberal and conservative patriots and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I'll let you answer which one of us will need whose help in 15 years. Sincerely, John J. Wall Law Student and an American P.S. Also, please take Ted Turner, Sean Penn, Martin Sheen, Barbara Streisand, & Jane Fonda with you. P. S. S. And we won't have to press 1 for English. -- "Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others." - Ayn Rand "Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass" Looking at the land mass question that is easy. *obama's support is principally in the coastal cities. *Washington north to Boston. *and Los Angles north to San Francisco. *Chicago which is still controlled by the Daley machine we could toss in. Which leaves the land mass that controls 80% of the US senate, and the majority of the US House. of course, the most educated and richest portions of the country where places like harvard, MIT, berkeley and stanford are....are obama areas you can have bob jones university. we'll take harvard |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mickey's divorce | General |