| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 24, 9:53 pm, BAR wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer. I thought it was following through on a campaign promise. Why are we still in Iraq? Didn't Obama say he was going to get us out of Iraq too? Why are we still in Iraq? |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 25, 8:12*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 9:53 pm, BAR wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer. I thought it was following through on a campaign promise. Why are we still in Iraq? Didn't Obama say he was going to get us out of Iraq too? Why are we still in Iraq?- he did not say he was going to 'get us out of iraq'. he said he was going to get us out consistent with US policy objectives. and he is. US troops are no longer involved in combat operations. you take pride in your ignorance or is it just a hobby? |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 8:12 am, BAR wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 9:53 pm, BAR wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer. I thought it was following through on a campaign promise. Why are we still in Iraq? Didn't Obama say he was going to get us out of Iraq too? Why are we still in Iraq?- he did not say he was going to 'get us out of iraq'. he said he was going to get us out consistent with US policy objectives. and he is. US troops are no longer involved in combat operations. What are the US policy objectives in Iraq? you take pride in your ignorance or is it just a hobby? You are too much fun to play with. I guess you could call it a sport. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 25, 2:32*pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 8:12 am, BAR wrote: this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer. I thought it was following through on a campaign promise. Why are we still in Iraq? Didn't Obama say he was going to get us out of Iraq too? Why are we still in Iraq?- he did not say he was going to 'get us out of iraq'. he said he was going to get us out consistent with US policy objectives. and he is. US troops are no longer involved in combat operations. What are the US policy objectives in Iraq? you seem not to know. you keep posting ridiculous assertions (e.g. 'obama said he's going to get out of afghanistan') without any reference or context. it seems you have no idea what's going on and aren't interested in finding out. your primary goal seem to be immediate surrender and appeasement of the taliban. you take pride in your ignorance or is it just a hobby? You are too much fun to play with. I guess you could call it a sport.- chuckle watching you roll around in your ignorance is kind of like watching a 3 legged pig in a pen. the amusement value alone is worth it. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 2:32 pm, BAR wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 8:12 am, BAR wrote: this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer. I thought it was following through on a campaign promise. Why are we still in Iraq? Didn't Obama say he was going to get us out of Iraq too? Why are we still in Iraq?- he did not say he was going to 'get us out of iraq'. he said he was going to get us out consistent with US policy objectives. and he is. US troops are no longer involved in combat operations. What are the US policy objectives in Iraq? you seem not to know. you keep posting ridiculous assertions (e.g. 'obama said he's going to get out of afghanistan') without any reference or context. it seems you have no idea what's going on and aren't interested in finding out. your primary goal seem to be immediate surrender and appeasement of the taliban. I do not believe you have any idea why the US was in Iraq or Afghanistan or why we are still in either country. Nor do I believe that you have any idea why Obama has continued 90% of Bush's foreign policies. you take pride in your ignorance or is it just a hobby? You are too much fun to play with. I guess you could call it a sport.- chuckle watching you roll around in your ignorance is kind of like watching a 3 legged pig in a pen. the amusement value alone is worth it. When someone asks you a question you can't answer the question, why? Is it because you do not have a grasp of the subject matter or is there some other reason? |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 25, 7:41*pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote: you seem not to know. you keep posting ridiculous assertions (e.g. 'obama said he's going to get out of afghanistan') without any reference or context. it seems you have no idea what's going on and aren't interested in finding out. your primary goal seem to be immediate surrender and appeasement of the taliban. I do not believe you have any idea why the US was in Iraq or Afghanistan or why we are still in either country. Nor do I believe that you have any idea why Obama has continued 90% of Bush's foreign policies. it's interesting watching the clueless sputter around like a beheaded cockroach, thinking themselves alive and conscious all the while they're ignorant and brain dead. they have their little mantra. they have their little world. and nothing can penetrate or enlighten interesting phenomenon. you take pride in your ignorance or is it just a hobby? You are too much fun to play with. I guess you could call it a sport.- chuckle watching you roll around in your ignorance is kind of like watching a 3 legged pig in a pen. the amusement value alone is worth it. When someone asks you a question you can't answer the question, why? Is it because you do not have a grasp of the subject matter or is there some other reason?- you're not asking a question. you're making a statement that you put a question mark at the end of. nothing can penetrate the dense material that you call a 'brain' and others call a lump of rotten protein that's never been used. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:32:08 -0400, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 8:12 am, BAR wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 9:53 pm, BAR wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer. I thought it was following through on a campaign promise. Why are we still in Iraq? Didn't Obama say he was going to get us out of Iraq too? Why are we still in Iraq?- he did not say he was going to 'get us out of iraq'. he said he was going to get us out consistent with US policy objectives. and he is. US troops are no longer involved in combat operations. What are the US policy objectives in Iraq? you take pride in your ignorance or is it just a hobby? You are too much fun to play with. I guess you could call it a sport. About as sporty as catching dog fish in Puget Sound. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"BAR" wrote in message ... wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 9:53 pm, BAR wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer. I thought it was following through on a campaign promise. Why are we still in Iraq? Didn't Obama say he was going to get us out of Iraq too? Why are we still in Iraq? Because he lied? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| What the hell is going on in the US? | General | |||
| What the hell... | General | |||
| What the hell? | General | |||
| I'm going to hell! | ASA | |||
| What the Hell is That? | ASA | |||