What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:18:52 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 25, 7:08*am, Guzzistimo wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:37:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 24, 8:03*pm, Guzzistimo wrote:
If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?

hey idiot...

you guys are amazing.

uh...questions for you:

1. when did US troops enter afghanistan?
2. how long has obama been president

take your head out of your diaper...

What difference does either question make?

Obama has had plenty of time to pull out of Afghanistan, and Iraq for
that matter.

Why are we still in Afghanistan. What does Obama hope to get out of
our involvement there?
--

disrupting the ability of the taliban to conduct state sponsored
terrorism. i realize that, to you folks in the 'neville chamberlain
fan club', that's a horrible thought. but to those of us who were in
NY after 9/11, it's kind of important

What state sponsored terrorism did the Taliban conduct? They've not
attacked us.
--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:42:35 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 25, 2:33*pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

The Taliban never conducted state sponsored terrorism. The Taliban was
used by OBL and AQ as a base of operations because Afghanistan is the
anus of the Earth.-

you say potatoes...i say po-tah-toes...

blah blah blah

You agree with me that the Taliban did not attach the USA.-

who are the taliban? and, no, i don't agree.

do you know what the 'USA' is?

Did you not say this?

"disrupting the ability of the taliban to conduct state sponsored
terrorism. i realize that, to you folks in the 'neville chamberlain
fan club', that's a horrible thought. but to those of us who were in
NY after 9/11, it's kind of important"

Did you not know of whom you spoke? You don't know who the Taliban
are, yet you say the reason we're in Afghanistan is to disrupt their
activities.

In another breath you call folks stupid.


--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:17:30 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 25, 7:09*am, Guzzistimo wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:05:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"





wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
m...
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote:
If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?

hey idiot...

you guys are amazing.

uh...questions for you:

1. when did US troops enter afghanistan?
2. how long has obama been president

take your head out of your diaper...

Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it
takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.

Please explain why he should want to do that, given that the Taliban will
come right back.

So we are in Afghanistan just to keep the Taliban from coming back
from Pakistan? Why?

What if they just decide to stay in Pakistan?
--

do you read the news? apparently not.

they're not staying in pakistan

the pakistanis are attacking them there

we are as well

i would call you as dumb as a bag of hammers, but hammers actually
have a use.

You really believe the Pakistanis are doing damage to the Taliban?
--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Aug 25, 4:04*pm, Mille GT Owner wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:42:35 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 25, 2:33*pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

The Taliban never conducted state sponsored terrorism. The Taliban was
used by OBL and AQ as a base of operations because Afghanistan is the
anus of the Earth.-

you say potatoes...i say po-tah-toes...

blah blah blah

You agree with me that the Taliban did not attach the USA.-

who are the taliban? and, no, i don't agree.

do you know what the 'USA' is?

Did you not say this?

"disrupting the ability of the taliban to conduct state sponsored
terrorism. i realize that, to you folks in the 'neville chamberlain
fan club', that's a horrible thought. but to those of us who were in
NY after 9/11, it's kind of important"

Did you not know of whom you spoke? You don't know who the Taliban
are, yet you say the reason we're in Afghanistan is to disrupt their
activities.

In another breath you call folks stupid.


i suggest you try following the thread instead pretending you
understand it. your evaluation of your own reading skills is pathetic.

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Aug 25, 4:01*pm, Mille GT Owner wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:18:52 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 25, 7:08*am, Guzzistimo wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:37:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 24, 8:03*pm, Guzzistimo wrote:
If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?

hey idiot...

you guys are amazing.

uh...questions for you:

1. when did US troops enter afghanistan?
2. how long has obama been president

take your head out of your diaper...

What difference does either question make?

Obama has had plenty of time to pull out of Afghanistan, and Iraq for
that matter.

Why are we still in Afghanistan. What does Obama hope to get out of
our involvement there?
--

disrupting the ability of the taliban to conduct state sponsored
terrorism. i realize that, to you folks in the 'neville chamberlain
fan club', that's a horrible thought. but to those of us who were in
NY after 9/11, it's kind of important

What state sponsored terrorism did the Taliban conduct? They've not
attacked us.
--


ever hear of 9/11? you guys keep saying the taliban is like the girl
scouts. when i point out the date of 9/11

i never hear from you again. whatsamatter? dont remember that day?

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:30:14 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 25, 8:11*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:11 am, Guzzistimo wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:42:07 -0700, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
"Guzzistimo" wrote in message
...
If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/wo....html?_r=1&th&....
--
John H
"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous
Perhaps it's to fix the mess that Bush neglected to fix?
Right-wing nut = loves Taliban
Here comes the Bush Rationale again.

What 'mess' is Obama trying to fix? That's the original question?
--

the mess that bush was unable to develop a strategy to build an
effective security apparatus in afghanistan.

And you believe that Obama is going to fix Afghanistan? Nobody has ever
fixed Afghanistan.-

sure they have.

you're just too dumb to realize it.

And you call others dumb and stupid?


--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:32:08 -0400, BAR wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 8:12 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 24, 9:53 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote:
If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?
hey idiot...
you guys are amazing.
uh...questions for you:
1. when did US troops enter afghanistan?
2. how long has obama been president
take your head out of your diaper...
Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it
takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer.
I thought it was following through on a campaign promise. Why are we
still in Iraq? Didn't Obama say he was going to get us out of Iraq too?

Why are we still in Iraq?-

he did not say he was going to 'get us out of iraq'. he said he was
going to get us out consistent with US policy objectives. and he is.
US troops are no longer involved in combat operations.

What are the US policy objectives in Iraq?

you take pride in your ignorance or is it just a hobby?

You are too much fun to play with. I guess you could call it a sport.

About as sporty as catching dog fish in Puget Sound.
--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:23:45 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:16:25 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 24, 9:53*pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote:
If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?

hey idiot...

you guys are amazing.

uh...questions for you:

1. when did US troops enter afghanistan?
2. how long has obama been president

take your head out of your diaper...

Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it
takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer.

Obama's got the Reps sucking up gov cash for clunkers welfare,
supporting Medicare, and calling for an increase in SS payments.
Might as well turn them into appeasers of Muslim terrorism too.

--Vic

So staying in Afghanistan is for what purpose? Do we stay there simply
so we don't 'appease' Muslims by getting out?
--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:19:32 -0400, BAR wrote:

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote:
If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?

hey idiot...

you guys are amazing.

uh...questions for you:


1. when did US troops enter afghanistan?
2. how long has obama been president

take your head out of your diaper...
Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it
takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.

You mean, he really didn't mean it when he was running for POTUS?? Oh
my, hope I still get my free car and oil;)

I practically got a free car yesterday. I now have a brand new Nissan
Versa and the $4,500 you all kicked in paid for nearly half of the
vehicle. I stroked a check for the rest. Just doing my part to help the
economy according to Congress and Obama's rules.

You're a sweetheart, Bert. Thanks ever so much for your efforts.
--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:57:45 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:19:32 -0400, BAR wrote:

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote:
If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?

hey idiot...

you guys are amazing.

uh...questions for you:


1. when did US troops enter afghanistan?
2. how long has obama been president

take your head out of your diaper...
Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it
takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.

You mean, he really didn't mean it when he was running for POTUS?? Oh
my, hope I still get my free car and oil;)

I practically got a free car yesterday. I now have a brand new Nissan
Versa and the $4,500 you all kicked in paid for nearly half of the
vehicle. I stroked a check for the rest. Just doing my part to help the
economy according to Congress and Obama's rules.

Congratulations!
Good to see you admit gov welfare is ok when it goes in your pocket.
Honesty is a virtue.

--Vic

Whooooosh.
--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous