|
What the hell are we doing here...
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:03:19 -0400, Guzzistimo
wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? What would it cost to buy all the opium? Have to be the bargain of the century. The dope is financing the Taliban, reason enough to **** with the trade, Casady |
What the hell are we doing here...
"BAR" wrote in message ... wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 9:53 pm, BAR wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer. I thought it was following through on a campaign promise. Why are we still in Iraq? Didn't Obama say he was going to get us out of Iraq too? Why are we still in Iraq? Because he lied? |
What the hell are we doing here...
"BAR" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates. Please explain why he should want to do that, given that the Taliban will come right back. The Taliban will always come back in some form or another. The Muslims do not look at their struggle as a one, two or ten year effort. It is a centuries effort. If it takes the Muslims 10 generations they will wait, if it takes 10 centuries they will wait. The Muslims are more patient than us. The Muslim goal is to eradicate all infidels and rule the world. No other solution is acceptable, and any means to gain that end are acceptable. Steve |
What the hell are we doing here...
On Aug 25, 8:12*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 9:53 pm, BAR wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is called 'surrender' or 'appeasement'...whichever you prefer. I thought it was following through on a campaign promise. Why are we still in Iraq? Didn't Obama say he was going to get us out of Iraq too? Why are we still in Iraq?- he did not say he was going to 'get us out of iraq'. he said he was going to get us out consistent with US policy objectives. and he is. US troops are no longer involved in combat operations. you take pride in your ignorance or is it just a hobby? |
What the hell are we doing here...
On Aug 25, 8:21*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 7:08 am, Guzzistimo wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:37:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... What difference does either question make? Obama has had plenty of time to pull out of Afghanistan, and Iraq for that matter. Why are we still in Afghanistan. What does Obama hope to get out of our involvement there? -- disrupting the ability of the taliban to conduct state sponsored terrorism. i realize that, to you folks in the 'neville chamberlain fan club', that's a horrible thought. but to those of us who were in NY after 9/11, it's kind of important The Taliban never conducted state sponsored terrorism. The Taliban was used by OBL and AQ as a base of operations because Afghanistan is the anus of the Earth.- you say potatoes...i say po-tah-toes... blah blah blah |
What the hell are we doing here...
On Aug 25, 7:45*am, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 7:08 am, Guzzistimo wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:37:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... What difference does either question make? Obama has had plenty of time to pull out of Afghanistan, and Iraq for that matter. Why are we still in Afghanistan. What does Obama hope to get out of our involvement there? -- disrupting the ability of the taliban to conduct state sponsored terrorism. i realize that, to you folks in the 'neville chamberlain fan club', that's a horrible thought. but to those of us who were in NY after 9/11, it's kind of important If the dimwit righties around here such as herring understood that, it would destroy what little is left in their minds of the reason why Bush invaded Iraq they astound...truly astound..with the world class level of their stupidity. |
What the hell are we doing here...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates. You mean, he really didn't mean it when he was running for POTUS?? Oh my, hope I still get my free car and oil;) Please show me where Obama said he'd give you a free car and oil. Another right wing fallacy. Everything isn't a "right wing fallacy" just because you don't agree with it. See, that is the difference between the right and the left. I accept that you may have a different point of view. It doesn't mean your lying, it doesn't mean you are stupid, racist, or any of the other "left wing fallacies".. Just a different point of view... Either way, you should have figured out by now that I don't take much of this seriously here... I really don't have the time to argue and research all the crap that goes on. The kid is in the points race and working very hard. I am trying to keep up and get her and the machine where it needs to be... That is a full time job in itself... No but the lies the right has propagated lately are being gobbled up by the conservatives as truth no matter HOW outlandish they are. That's the whole point. |
What the hell are we doing here...
On Aug 25, 8:17*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 7:09 am, Guzzistimo wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:05:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message news:ha6dnQPzlemR2Q7XnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@giganews. com... wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates. Please explain why he should want to do that, given that the Taliban will come right back. So we are in Afghanistan just to keep the Taliban from coming back from Pakistan? Why? What if they just decide to stay in Pakistan? -- do you read the news? apparently not. they're not staying in pakistan the pakistanis are attacking them there we are as well i would call you as dumb as a bag of hammers, but hammers actually have a use. US foreign policy is based on home much money we have given them lately. When we stop giving the Pakistanis money the will stop fighting the Taliban.- we have been giving them money for a long time. they didn't do dick until the taliban started colonizing whole provinces. any other idiotic notions you want to spew? |
What the hell are we doing here...
On Aug 25, 8:15*am, BAR wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "BAR" wrote in message m... wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote: If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin? hey idiot... you guys are amazing. uh...questions for you: 1. when did US troops enter afghanistan? 2. how long has obama been president take your head out of your diaper... Obama could have pulled the US troops out of Afghanistan by now. All it takes is an order to Sec Def Gates. Please explain why he should want to do that, given that the Taliban will come right back. The Taliban will always come back in some form or another. The Muslims do not look at their struggle as a one, two or ten year effort. It is a centuries effort. If it takes the Muslims 10 generations they will wait, if it takes 10 centuries they will wait. The Muslims are more patient than us.- first there's a difference between the 'taliban' and muslims. not all muslims are crazed psychopathic fanatics. 2nd, there's no proof this is true. the 'muslims' have already started destroying the more fanatical elements in their midst, as recent events in the gaza strip, and in pakistan have shown. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com