What the hell are we doing here...
 

Don White wrote:

So you agree that you are swilling cheap beer and that is all you can
afford.
Well, Bill, you have to remember, his kid sucks most of it down.

But I'd swear on a stack of Bibles that I have never broken a bone in his
body.
Beat that LooneyTunes.



Another admission. Can you get any dumber?

What the hell are we doing here...
 

"D 2" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:

So you agree that you are swilling cheap beer and that is all you can
afford.
Well, Bill, you have to remember, his kid sucks most of it down.

But I'd swear on a stack of Bibles that I have never broken a bone in his
body.
Beat that LooneyTunes.

Another admission. Can you get any dumber?


You're too dumb to even bother with.
Back to the septic tank...you must be getting hungry.

What the hell are we doing here...
 

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 4:49 pm, Mille GT Owner wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:06:43 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 25, 4:01 pm, Mille GT Owner wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:18:52 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:08 am, Guzzistimo wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:37:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote:
If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?
hey idiot...
you guys are amazing.
uh...questions for you:
1. when did US troops enter afghanistan?
2. how long has obama been president
take your head out of your diaper...
What difference does either question make?
Obama has had plenty of time to pull out of Afghanistan, and Iraq for
that matter.
Why are we still in Afghanistan. What does Obama hope to get out of
our involvement there?
--
disrupting the ability of the taliban to conduct state sponsored
terrorism. i realize that, to you folks in the 'neville chamberlain
fan club', that's a horrible thought. but to those of us who were in
NY after 9/11, it's kind of important
What state sponsored terrorism did the Taliban conduct? They've not
attacked us.
--
ever hear of 9/11? you guys keep saying the taliban is like the girl
scouts. when i point out the date of 9/11
i never hear from you again. whatsamatter? dont remember that day?
The Taliban did not attack us on 9/11.

yes, they did. i realize, as president of the 'neville chamberlain'
society you're required to tow the party line, but i think your
umbrella has some holes in it

not unlike your head.

A while back, the liberals were blaming Saudia Arabia and Bush for
9/11. Now you're using it as a rationale for staying in Afghanistan.
Y'all need to make up your minds.
--

ROFLMAO!! i guess you think bush is still president!! don't they give
you an alzheimer's test in your rest home?

The VA has the Your Choice on How to Die book they pass out to all
veterans.

What the hell are we doing here...
 

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:42 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 2:33 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
The Taliban never conducted state sponsored terrorism. The Taliban was
used by OBL and AQ as a base of operations because Afghanistan is the
anus of the Earth.-
you say potatoes...i say po-tah-toes...
blah blah blah
You agree with me that the Taliban did not attach the USA.-
who are the taliban? and, no, i don't agree.
do you know what the 'USA' is?
It is not polite to answer a question with a question?

it's called the 'socratic method'. i'm not sure you're teachable, but
it's amusing to try...

You are not qualified to teach.

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Aug 28, 7:09*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:


it's called the 'socratic method'. i'm not sure you're teachable, but
it's amusing to try...

You are not qualified to teach.-

that's OK because you can't learn.

What the hell are we doing here...
 

On Aug 28, 7:05*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 4:49 pm, Mille GT Owner wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:06:43 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 25, 4:01 pm, Mille GT Owner wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:18:52 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:08 am, Guzzistimo wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:37:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:03 pm, Guzzistimo wrote:
If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?
hey idiot...
you guys are amazing.
uh...questions for you:
1. when did US troops enter afghanistan?
2. how long has obama been president
take your head out of your diaper...
What difference does either question make?
Obama has had plenty of time to pull out of Afghanistan, and Iraq for
that matter.
Why are we still in Afghanistan. What does Obama hope to get out of
our involvement there?
--
disrupting the ability of the taliban to conduct state sponsored
terrorism. i realize that, to you folks in the 'neville chamberlain
fan club', that's a horrible thought. but to those of us who were in
NY after 9/11, it's kind of important
What state sponsored terrorism did the Taliban conduct? They've not
attacked us.
--
ever hear of 9/11? you guys keep saying the taliban is like the girl
scouts. when i point out the date of 9/11
i never hear from you again. whatsamatter? dont remember that day?
The Taliban did not attack us on 9/11.

yes, they did. i realize, as president of the 'neville chamberlain'
society you're required to tow the party line, but i think your
umbrella has some holes in it

not unlike your head.

A while back, the liberals were blaming Saudia Arabia and Bush for
9/11. Now you're using it as a rationale for staying in Afghanistan.
Y'all need to make up your minds.
--

ROFLMAO!! i guess you think bush is still president!! don't they give
you an alzheimer's test in your rest home?

The VA has the Your Choice on How to Die book they pass out to all
veterans.-

actually they don't. they have a book on making decisions about end of
life issues.

What the hell are we doing here...
 

BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:42 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 2:33 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
The Taliban never conducted state sponsored terrorism. The
Taliban was
used by OBL and AQ as a base of operations because Afghanistan is
the
anus of the Earth.-
you say potatoes...i say po-tah-toes...
blah blah blah
You agree with me that the Taliban did not attach the USA.-
who are the taliban? and, no, i don't agree.
do you know what the 'USA' is?
It is not polite to answer a question with a question?

it's called the 'socratic method'. i'm not sure you're teachable, but
it's amusing to try...

You are not qualified to teach.


You've already proved you're not qualified to be a student. You didn't
have what it takes to succeed in college, so you...joined the marines.

What the hell are we doing here...
 

H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:42 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 2:33 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
The Taliban never conducted state sponsored terrorism. The
Taliban was
used by OBL and AQ as a base of operations because Afghanistan
is the
anus of the Earth.-
you say potatoes...i say po-tah-toes...
blah blah blah
You agree with me that the Taliban did not attach the USA.-
who are the taliban? and, no, i don't agree.
do you know what the 'USA' is?
It is not polite to answer a question with a question?

it's called the 'socratic method'. i'm not sure you're teachable, but
it's amusing to try...

You are not qualified to teach.


You've already proved you're not qualified to be a student. You didn't
have what it takes to succeed in college, so you...joined the marines.

But, I have succeeded in life. And, I have exceeded your "success" in
all areas.

September 1st is fast approaching isn't it about time for you to write a
check to your landlord.

What the hell are we doing here...
 

BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:42 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 2:33 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
The Taliban never conducted state sponsored terrorism. The
Taliban was
used by OBL and AQ as a base of operations because Afghanistan
is the
anus of the Earth.-
you say potatoes...i say po-tah-toes...
blah blah blah
You agree with me that the Taliban did not attach the USA.-
who are the taliban? and, no, i don't agree.
do you know what the 'USA' is?
It is not polite to answer a question with a question?

it's called the 'socratic method'. i'm not sure you're teachable, but
it's amusing to try...

You are not qualified to teach.


You've already proved you're not qualified to be a student. You didn't
have what it takes to succeed in college, so you...joined the marines.

But, I have succeeded in life. And, I have exceeded your "success" in
all areas.

September 1st is fast approaching isn't it about time for you to write a
check to your landlord.

You still trying to peddle those stinking old fish? You're an "at-will"
employee at a company that can cut you loose in a NY minute...and I hope
it does...the lessons you learn will help you get on with your life.

What the hell are we doing here...
 

H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:42 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 2:33 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
The Taliban never conducted state sponsored terrorism. The
Taliban was
used by OBL and AQ as a base of operations because Afghanistan
is the
anus of the Earth.-
you say potatoes...i say po-tah-toes...
blah blah blah
You agree with me that the Taliban did not attach the USA.-
who are the taliban? and, no, i don't agree.
do you know what the 'USA' is?
It is not polite to answer a question with a question?

it's called the 'socratic method'. i'm not sure you're teachable, but
it's amusing to try...

You are not qualified to teach.


You've already proved you're not qualified to be a student. You
didn't have what it takes to succeed in college, so you...joined the
marines.

But, I have succeeded in life. And, I have exceeded your "success" in
all areas.

September 1st is fast approaching isn't it about time for you to write
a check to your landlord.

You still trying to peddle those stinking old fish? You're an "at-will"
employee at a company that can cut you loose in a NY minute...and I hope
it does...the lessons you learn will help you get on with your life.

Yes I am an at-will employee and I have been an at-will employee all of
my life.

The company I currently work for does not owe me anything and I don't
owe them anything. I do the work they ask me to do and they pay me the
agreed upon salary.

If my value to the company goes down why should they keep me around?
And, if I believe that my value to the company has gone up but the
company doesn't see it that way I am free to seek employment at another
company that values the same as I value myself.

What you don't realize is that your view of the relationship between
worker and corporation is one of indentured servitude. Enjoy your bonded
labor.