On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:23:36 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 21, 12:09*am, wrote:
. *The strongest national
economy in the history of the modern world. *The most affluent
middle-class in modern history.

which hasn't had a pay increase in 30 years.

Now, does the claim that the middle-class hasn't had a pay increase in
30 years, not that the phrase is itself meaningful in any
macroeconomic sense, refute the statement that the U.S. has had the
the most affluent middle-class in modern history, or is it an attempt
to dodge contesting that fact?


ROFLMAO!! iow you're acknowledging the middle class is being
impoverished by the very people you say are making us rich.

No, what I wrote does not even imply such. I was speaking to
your claim, which does not go to the point. You need to revisit your
cup of coffee.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Aug 21, 7:15*am, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:23:36 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 21, 12:09*am, wrote:
. *The strongest national
economy in the history of the modern world. *The most affluent
middle-class in modern history.

which hasn't had a pay increase in 30 years.

Now, does the claim that the middle-class hasn't had a pay increase in
30 years, not that the phrase is itself meaningful in any
macroeconomic sense, refute the statement that the U.S. has had the
the most affluent middle-class in modern history, or is it an attempt
to dodge contesting that fact?

ROFLMAO!! iow you're acknowledging the middle class is being
impoverished by the very people you say are making us rich.

* * * * No, what I wrote does not even imply such. *I was speaking to
your claim, which does not go to the point. *You need to revisit your
cup of coffee.


my claim was that the middle class hasn't had a pay increase in 30
years. you confirmed that. perhaps remedial reading would help you.

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:19:37 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 21, 7:15*am, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:23:36 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 21, 12:09*am, wrote:
. *The strongest national
economy in the history of the modern world. *The most affluent
middle-class in modern history.

which hasn't had a pay increase in 30 years.

Now, does the claim that the middle-class hasn't had a pay increase in
30 years, not that the phrase is itself meaningful in any
macroeconomic sense, refute the statement that the U.S. has had the
the most affluent middle-class in modern history, or is it an attempt
to dodge contesting that fact?

ROFLMAO!! iow you're acknowledging the middle class is being
impoverished by the very people you say are making us rich.

* * * * No, what I wrote does not even imply such. *I was speaking to
your claim, which does not go to the point. *You need to revisit your
cup of coffee.


my claim was that the middle class hasn't had a pay increase in 30
years. you confirmed that. perhaps remedial reading would help you.

You do realize the Lewis Carroll's heralded work was a piece of
fiction? (Or are you unable to even determine why I included this
question.)

Comprehension would suit you well. There's no debate where
comprehension fails. Enjoy.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access