wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:22 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:30:17 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 19, 5:54 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
The university itself is admitting tonight on the news that it dropped
the ball on this guy. He was known to be crazy as a ****house rat but
they never told anyone so his background check came back clean.
ah. well. that makes it OK then. it's OK if crazy people have guns to
slaughter 33 people, as long as they didn't tell anyone they're crazy.
uh huh.
It is not OK but you either have to loosen privacy laws about crazy
people or risk the danger of them buying guns. BTW the NRA says the
instant check should include mental health records. It is the left who
says that should remain private.-

and it's the NRA that opposes any restrictions on guns at all. it
opposed instant checks. it opposed taking guns away from crazy people,
wife abusers, etc.

in fact gun control is meaningless. we need to repeal the 2nd
amendment and ban guns completely.

If that is your desire I suggest you get started on the process to amend
the Constitution.

On Aug 20, 7:19*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:22 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:30:17 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 19, 5:54 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
The university itself is admitting tonight on the news that it dropped
the ball on this guy. He was known to be crazy as a ****house rat but
they never told anyone so his background check came back clean.
ah. well. that makes it OK then. it's OK if crazy people have guns to
slaughter 33 people, as long as they didn't tell anyone they're crazy..
uh huh.
It is not OK but you either have to loosen privacy laws about crazy
people or risk the danger of them buying guns. BTW the NRA says the
instant check should include mental health records. It is the left who
says that should remain private.-

and it's the NRA that opposes any restrictions on guns at all. it
opposed instant checks. it opposed taking guns away from crazy people,
wife abusers, etc.

in fact gun control is meaningless. we need to repeal the 2nd
amendment and ban guns completely.

If that is your desire I suggest you get started on the process to amend
the Constitution.-

if only i had the time. i work for a living.

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 20, 7:19 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:22 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:30:17 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 19, 5:54 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
The university itself is admitting tonight on the news that it dropped
the ball on this guy. He was known to be crazy as a ****house rat but
they never told anyone so his background check came back clean.
ah. well. that makes it OK then. it's OK if crazy people have guns to
slaughter 33 people, as long as they didn't tell anyone they're crazy..
uh huh.
It is not OK but you either have to loosen privacy laws about crazy
people or risk the danger of them buying guns. BTW the NRA says the
instant check should include mental health records. It is the left who
says that should remain private.-
and it's the NRA that opposes any restrictions on guns at all. it
opposed instant checks. it opposed taking guns away from crazy people,
wife abusers, etc.
in fact gun control is meaningless. we need to repeal the 2nd
amendment and ban guns completely.
If that is your desire I suggest you get started on the process to amend
the Constitution.-

if only i had the time. i work for a living.

I guess you are not serious about your stated desire. If you were
serious you would find the time.

Now we know you are just a whiner.

On Aug 20, 8:14*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

if only i had the time. i work for a living.

I guess you are not serious about your stated desire. If you were
serious you would find the time.

Now we know you are just a whiner.-

uh, no. i was a believer in the free market. unlike you, however, i
can handle reality and don't need to retreat into fantasy.

hope your mom told you to quit sucking your thumb or you're going to
need braces

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 20, 7:19 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:22 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:30:17 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 19, 5:54 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
The university itself is admitting tonight on the news that it
dropped
the ball on this guy. He was known to be crazy as a ****house rat but
they never told anyone so his background check came back clean.
ah. well. that makes it OK then. it's OK if crazy people have guns to
slaughter 33 people, as long as they didn't tell anyone they're crazy.
uh huh.
It is not OK but you either have to loosen privacy laws about crazy
people or risk the danger of them buying guns. BTW the NRA says the
instant check should include mental health records. It is the left who
says that should remain private.-

and it's the NRA that opposes any restrictions on guns at all. it
opposed instant checks. it opposed taking guns away from crazy people,
wife abusers, etc.

in fact gun control is meaningless. we need to repeal the 2nd
amendment and ban guns completely.

If that is your desire I suggest you get started on the process to amend
the Constitution.-

if only i had the time. i work for a living.

reply: Wow, that's a plausible excuse. So, what it amounts to is that you
really do not believe in what you belive in enough to work to make it
happen. Do I have it right?

Steve

On Aug 20, 11:03*am, "SteveB" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Aug 20, 7:19 am, BAR wrote:





wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:22 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:30:17 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 19, 5:54 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
The university itself is admitting tonight on the news that it
dropped
the ball on this guy. He was known to be crazy as a ****house rat but
they never told anyone so his background check came back clean.
ah. well. that makes it OK then. it's OK if crazy people have guns to
slaughter 33 people, as long as they didn't tell anyone they're crazy.
uh huh.
It is not OK but you either have to loosen privacy laws about crazy
people or risk the danger of them buying guns. BTW the NRA says the
instant check should include mental health records. It is the left who
says that should remain private.-

and it's the NRA that opposes any restrictions on guns at all. it
opposed instant checks. it opposed taking guns away from crazy people,
wife abusers, etc.

in fact gun control is meaningless. we need to repeal the 2nd
amendment and ban guns completely.

If that is your desire I suggest you get started on the process to amend
the Constitution.-

if only i had the time. i work for a living.

reply: *Wow, that's a plausible excuse. *So, what it amounts to is that you
really do not believe in what you belive in enough to work to make it
happen. *Do I have it right?


uh no. i work for a living. unlike you rich folkkks SOMEONE has to
work to support you.

"BAR" wrote in message
...
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:22 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:30:17 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 19, 5:54 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
The university itself is admitting tonight on the news that it dropped
the ball on this guy. He was known to be crazy as a ****house rat but
they never told anyone so his background check came back clean.
ah. well. that makes it OK then. it's OK if crazy people have guns to
slaughter 33 people, as long as they didn't tell anyone they're crazy.
uh huh.
It is not OK but you either have to loosen privacy laws about crazy
people or risk the danger of them buying guns. BTW the NRA says the
instant check should include mental health records. It is the left who
says that should remain private.-

and it's the NRA that opposes any restrictions on guns at all. it
opposed instant checks. it opposed taking guns away from crazy people,
wife abusers, etc.

in fact gun control is meaningless. we need to repeal the 2nd
amendment and ban guns completely.

If that is your desire I suggest you get started on the process to amend
the Constitution.

As he is entitled to do, but is too stupid to understand or learn. (He
slept through the classes the first time ..... civics, government, etc.)

Steve

On Aug 20, 11:02*am, "SteveB" wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message

...


..

If that is your desire I suggest you get started on the process to amend
the Constitution.

As he is entitled to do, but is too stupid to understand or learn. *(He
slept through the classes the first time ..... civics, government, etc.)


i guess stevie's too dumb to understand that one can repeal an
amendment. it's been done. he's just kinda stupid and doesnt know US
history...

IOW he's a typical NRA member