Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 11, 8:13 pm, Frogwatch wrote: Bozoma's good buddy Bill Ayers is on the record saying he would like to kill 20 million Americans ann now that Obama is in office he going to get that chance thru ObamaCare, the plan inspired by Ayers. Not only does it call for direct govt access to your bank account to pay for health care, it may withhold care for certain persons whose lives will not benefit enough from such procedures, the benefit to be determined by a clique of Obama/Ayers pals. much of our healthcare dollars (something like 20-30%) are spent on people in the last few weeks of life. we need to understand when it does and doesn't pay to perform medical procedures on people when they are beyond help. anyone who's worked in a hospital has seen people being treated when they are beyond help OTOH we DO ration care today in the most inefficient manner possible. people who COULD benefit from care are denied it because they can't pay. that's rationing, folks. regardless of what the right wing thinks about it, that is RATIONING so regardless of what the right thinks, we DO ration care in this country. as always we take care of the rich first. the middle class and poor ensure that the rich get the best medical care in the world. Act NOW and there is MORE. Not only will you get crappy health care and the govt taking money directly out of your bank account, they will bill your estate after your death for the cost of procedures. WAIT, THERE'S MORE. the right bitches about 'socialized' medicine what we have right now is medical care run by bear, stearns; goldman sachs, bank of america and all the other institutions that have shown how much they value the american consumer by laying off so many of us. yes, i want socialized medicine. because private enterprise DOES NOT WORK in medical care. Right now, for most Americans, health insurance and your health care is determined solely by corporations who decide who to cover, who to not cover, who to drop from coverage, what to cover, and what to charge for that coverage. In many cases, those decisions are arbitrary and capricious. You are so full of crap Harry it is coming out of your mouth. Why do you focus on health insurance? Why don't you focus on health care delivery? What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? It is utter stupidity to depend upon the vagaries of a corporation for something as important as health care insurance. Forgo health insurance and go with HSA's and pay for your health care with your own money. I've always gotten a kick out of the fools here and elsewhere who think that everyone has access to health care because they can go to an emergency room. What you get there if you don't have insurance is...short-changed. All you have to do is pay for the services you receive and you will get all of the health care you want. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 8:42*am, BAR wrote:
H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102
@o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42*am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- Wafa free since 2009 |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 10:22*am, JustWait wrote:
In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42*am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 12, 10:22 am, JustWait wrote: In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42 am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes The same corporations that doubled and tripled the money you and your corporate employer contributed? and then you lost 40%. But still have more than if you had got 2% a year in a savings account. If you had saved. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 13, 2:16*am, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 12, 10:22 am, JustWait wrote: In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42 am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes The same corporations that doubled and tripled the money you and your corporate employer contributed? *and then you lost 40%. *But still have more than if you had got 2% a year in a savings account. *If you had saved.- Hide quoted text - ROFLMAO!! they only do that because congress authorized them to. and because they've gutted pension plans. and, of course, they get a tax write off for 401k's. and they just stole the money back so their contributions are nil and, no, i don't have more money. my financial advisor told me that if i had put my money in my mattress since 2002, i'd be 20% ahead of where i'm at now. so while you insist that thieves and robbers are paragons of development, i see them for what they are |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 13, 2:16 am, "Calif Bill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 12, 10:22 am, JustWait wrote: In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42 am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes The same corporations that doubled and tripled the money you and your corporate employer contributed? and then you lost 40%. But still have more than if you had got 2% a year in a savings account. If you had saved.- Hide quoted text - ROFLMAO!! they only do that because congress authorized them to. and because they've gutted pension plans. and, of course, they get a tax write off for 401k's. and they just stole the money back so their contributions are nil and, no, i don't have more money. my financial advisor told me that if i had put my money in my mattress since 2002, i'd be 20% ahead of where i'm at now. My financial adviser told me, when the DOW was at 6700, that I might have to work a couple of extra years, until I was 60, before I retired. But, he also said that this is a great time to buy. Just the other day we, the wife and I, met with our financial adviser and we are back on track for me to retire at 56 since the DOW is at 9300. Retiring at 56 has been my goal for the past 5 years so. When I do retire I will have enough money to last until I and my wife reach 90 living at our current standard of living. so while you insist that thieves and robbers are paragons of development, i see them for what they are Start stuffing your mattress. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 13, 2:16 am, "Calif Bill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 12, 10:22 am, JustWait wrote: In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42 am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes The same corporations that doubled and tripled the money you and your corporate employer contributed? and then you lost 40%. But still have more than if you had got 2% a year in a savings account. If you had saved.- Hide quoted text - ROFLMAO!! they only do that because congress authorized them to. and because they've gutted pension plans. and, of course, they get a tax write off for 401k's. and they just stole the money back so their contributions are nil and, no, i don't have more money. my financial advisor told me that if i had put my money in my mattress since 2002, i'd be 20% ahead of where i'm at now. so while you insist that thieves and robbers are paragons of development, i see them for what they are Maybe you should have reviewed you 401k choices. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calif Bill wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 12, 10:22 am, JustWait wrote: In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42 am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes The same corporations that doubled and tripled the money you and your corporate employer contributed? and then you lost 40%. But still have more than if you had got 2% a year in a savings account. If you had saved. Bilious Bill is apologizing for Wall Street thievery...priceless. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "H the K" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 12, 10:22 am, JustWait wrote: In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42 am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes The same corporations that doubled and tripled the money you and your corporate employer contributed? and then you lost 40%. But still have more than if you had got 2% a year in a savings account. If you had saved. Bilious Bill is apologizing for Wall Street thievery...priceless. Nope. I think most of the major Wall Street CEO's should be sued by the shareholders or the SEC in support of the stockholders. But a lot of this crying about loss in your 401k is just like someone crying they lost $10 million when the dot.com bubble burst. Even through they had only bought $40k of stock. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Obama: The Mayo Clinic is a beacon on health care | General | |||
Republican Health Care Plan | General | |||
Health Care | General | |||
Health care under McCain, Obama | ASA | |||
FREE INSTANT ON-LINE HEALTH PLAN QUOTES | General |