Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. That is what government should be doing. Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 11, 7:25*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. *It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. *If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. *I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. *Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. *It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. *Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. *That is what government should be doing. *Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. *The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. Lefties who supported Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc in killing a hundred million people I should trust with my life? Lemme see, I should trust my life to a group that wants to shoot protestors? I s'pose that would seem reasonable to the party of Ayers. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:16:49 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Aug 11, 7:25*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. *It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. *If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. *I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. *Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. *It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. *Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. *That is what government should be doing. *Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. *The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. Lefties who supported Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc in killing a hundred million people I should trust with my life? Lemme see, I should trust my life to a group that wants to shoot protestors? I s'pose that would seem reasonable to the party of Ayers. Oh ****, have you gotten into your wife's oxycontin supply? Did you send the maid out to purchase more? You're gonna need 'em if you expect to continue coming up with highly delusional scenarios. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:16:49 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 11, 7:25 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. That is what government should be doing. Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. Lefties who supported Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc in killing a hundred million people I should trust with my life? Lemme see, I should trust my life to a group that wants to shoot protestors? I s'pose that would seem reasonable to the party of Ayers. Oh ****, have you gotten into your wife's oxycontin supply? Did you send the maid out to purchase more? You're gonna need 'em if you expect to continue coming up with highly delusional scenarios. Do you suppose froggy is getting his posting points from ... ClusterFox? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:33:31 -0400, H the K
wrote: jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:16:49 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 11, 7:25 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. That is what government should be doing. Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. Lefties who supported Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc in killing a hundred million people I should trust with my life? Lemme see, I should trust my life to a group that wants to shoot protestors? I s'pose that would seem reasonable to the party of Ayers. Oh ****, have you gotten into your wife's oxycontin supply? Did you send the maid out to purchase more? You're gonna need 'em if you expect to continue coming up with highly delusional scenarios. Do you suppose froggy is getting his posting points from ... ClusterFox? He has a very inventive imagination. Reminds me of Russel Crowes role in A Beautiful Mind. Suppose Froggie's house has strings that connect everything to everything else? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:25:12 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. That is what government should be doing. Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. I DON'T WANT CEMENT, I want blacktop. Cement is too expensive and makes my tires sound like an unmuffled jet engine, therefore causing me hearing loss. And, the Gov't should cover the cost of my hearing loss under medicare but I don't want them in that business. Damn them with their helping the elderly! |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:25:12 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. That is what government should be doing. Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. I DON'T WANT CEMENT, I want blacktop. Cement is too expensive and makes my tires sound like an unmuffled jet engine, therefore causing me hearing loss. And, the Gov't should cover the cost of my hearing loss under medicare but I don't want them in that business. Damn them with their helping the elderly! Asphalt does not stand up to liberal trucks as well. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wonder what the libs will have against this... | General | |||
Something to really tick off the cons... | General | |||
BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons | General | |||
cat rigs pros?? cons?? | General | |||
Libs give Hillary pass on racial slur. | General |