Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya
failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. The Obama
admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster
had to back down. Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and
Castro lost.

On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:35:46 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:

Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya
failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. The Obama
admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster
had to back down. Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and
Castro lost.

Uh, huh, so tell me, what country or organization has recognized the
"legal" government of Honduras? That's right, none. I'd also suggest
the story is far from over. Micheletti has blinked, and I wouldn't be
surprised to see Zelaya back as President.

thunder wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:35:46 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:

Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya
failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. The Obama
admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster
had to back down. Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and
Castro lost.

Uh, huh, so tell me, what country or organization has recognized the
"legal" government of Honduras? That's right, none. I'd also suggest
the story is far from over. Micheletti has blinked, and I wouldn't be
surprised to see Zelaya back as President.


I wouldn't be surprised to learn that holdover neocon thugs from the
Bush Admin in our CIA freelanced the coup.

On Aug 10, 9:35*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya
failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. *The Obama
admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster
had to back down. *Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and
Castro lost.

zalaya is a stupid ******* but obama, unlike his predecessor, believes
in the rule of law. i realize that, to right wingers, the rule of law
is something for other people, and power is the only law...but to some
of us, constitutional principles still have meaning.

thunder wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:35:46 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:

Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya
failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. The Obama
admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster
had to back down. Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and
Castro lost.

Uh, huh, so tell me, what country or organization has recognized the
"legal" government of Honduras? That's right, none. I'd also suggest
the story is far from over. Micheletti has blinked, and I wouldn't be
surprised to see Zelaya back as President.

The Hondouran government removed its President according to the Honduran
Constitution when the Honduran President tried to hold an extra
Constitutional referendum. The Honduran legislature was the prosecutor,
the Honduran Supreme Court was judge and the Honduran military was the
de facto police force.

Castro, Chavez and Obama didn't like what happened because they saw it
as a puny little Central American country enforcing Constitutional law
thereby preventing the chief of state from staying in office beyond his
constitutional limited term in office setting a bad precedent, according
to them.

H the K wrote:
thunder wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:35:46 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:

Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya
failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. The Obama
admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster
had to back down. Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and
Castro lost.

Uh, huh, so tell me, what country or organization has recognized the
"legal" government of Honduras? That's right, none. I'd also suggest
the story is far from over. Micheletti has blinked, and I wouldn't be
surprised to see Zelaya back as President.


I wouldn't be surprised to learn that holdover neocon thugs from the
Bush Admin in our CIA freelanced the coup

I suspect that in the 2012 election every failed program in the obama
administration will be blamed on President George Bush. Blaming others
in obama's only defense for his failures.

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 10, 9:35 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya
failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. The Obama
admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster
had to back down. Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and
Castro lost.

zalaya is a stupid ******* but obama, unlike his predecessor, believes
in the rule of law. i realize that, to right wingers, the rule of law
is something for other people, and power is the only law...but to some
of us, constitutional principles still have meaning.

To review the facts of the case, the Supreme Court of Honduras removed
the sitting president for illegal activities. The Congress of Honduras
appointed the new president under the Courts supervision.

As with everything else, if the obamadytes disagree with it, it is
trivialized or ignored. They still think there is no opposition to
their national health care plan.

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:41:32 -0400, BAR wrote:


The Hondouran government removed its President according to the Honduran
Constitution when the Honduran President tried to hold an extra
Constitutional referendum. The Honduran legislature was the prosecutor,
the Honduran Supreme Court was judge and the Honduran military was the
de facto police force.

I won't deny Zelaya overstepped his bounds, but I'll also guarantee his
removal was extra-constitutional. Over the years, Honduras has had far
too many coups, to encase them in their Constitution.




Castro, Chavez and Obama didn't like what happened because they saw it
as a puny little Central American country enforcing Constitutional law
thereby preventing the chief of state from staying in office beyond his
constitutional limited term in office setting a bad precedent, according
to them.

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:51:31 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:


To review the facts of the case, the Supreme Court of Honduras removed
the sitting president for illegal activities.

Then, according to their Constitution, you arrest him and bring him to
trial. Having the military, not the police, put him on a plane out of
the country, is a coup.

The Congress of Honduras
appointed the new president under the Courts supervision.

As with everything else, if the obamadytes disagree with it, it is
trivialized or ignored. They still think there is no opposition to
their national health care plan.

thunder wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:51:31 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:


To review the facts of the case, the Supreme Court of Honduras removed
the sitting president for illegal activities.

Then, according to their Constitution, you arrest him and bring him to
trial. Having the military, not the police, put him on a plane out of
the country, is a coup.

If the Honduran Supreme Court orders the Honduran military to put him on
a plane out of the country how is that a coup d'etat?

Does the Honduran Supreme Court have the authority to order the Honduran
military to arrest the Honduran President?

The Congress of Honduras
appointed the new president under the Courts supervision.

As with everything else, if the obamadytes disagree with it, it is
trivialized or ignored. They still think there is no opposition to
their national health care plan.