Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

J. Leo wrote:
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world’s rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually
believed the entire earth was warming, and it was going to create a
global catastrophe, they would be 100% behind nuclear power. There are
no green house gases from a nuclear power plant.

Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent global
warming I will accept it for what it is, politics.
I agree with this post.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe
it's really happening????

http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html

http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/


Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man
made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads in
the sand when it comes to global warming.

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:36:20 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

J. Leo wrote:
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world’s rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually
believed the entire earth was warming, and it was going to create a
global catastrophe, they would be 100% behind nuclear power. There are
no green house gases from a nuclear power plant.

Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent global
warming I will accept it for what it is, politics.
I agree with this post.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe
it's really happening????

http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html

http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/


Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man
made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads in
the sand when it comes to global warming.

Until I hear the liberals have started pushing for the building of
nuclear plants to prevent man made global warrming, I will accept it
for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

In article ,
says...

Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

J. Leo wrote:
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world?s rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually
believed the entire earth was warming, and it was going to create a
global catastrophe, they would be 100% behind nuclear power. There are
no green house gases from a nuclear power plant.

Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent global
warming I will accept it for what it is, politics.
I agree with this post.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe
it's really happening????

http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html

http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/


Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man
made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads in
the sand when it comes to global warming.

No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting when
you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you really look
at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried is as bad as me
suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read up on it, and have
simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides insulting me and the
folks on my side is why we all have Harry plonked... ewwwwwww..

--
Wafa free since 2009

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

J. Leo wrote:
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world?s rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually
believed the entire earth was warming, and it was going to create a
global catastrophe, they would be 100% behind nuclear power. There are
no green house gases from a nuclear power plant.

Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent global
warming I will accept it for what it is, politics.
I agree with this post.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe
it's really happening????

http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html

http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/

Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man
made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads in
the sand when it comes to global warming.

No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting when
you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you really look
at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried is as bad as me
suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read up on it, and have
simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides insulting me and the
folks on my side is why we all have Harry plonked... ewwwwwww..



What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron.

H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:


All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of
binary thinking.
So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly
believe it's really happening????

http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html

http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/


Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man
made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.
What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads
in the sand when it comes to global warming.

No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting
when you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you
really look at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried
is as bad as me suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read
up on it, and have simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides
insulting me and the folks on my side is why we all have Harry
plonked... ewwwwwww..



What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron.

"What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron."

A beautifully example of a liberal argument. and they wonder why people
have problems with liberal thinking.

Keith Nuttle wrote:
H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:


All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of
binary thinking.
So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly
believe it's really happening????

http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html

http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/


Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man
made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of
binary thinking.
What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective
heads in the sand when it comes to global warming.

No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting
when you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you
really look at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried
is as bad as me suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read
up on it, and have simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides
insulting me and the folks on my side is why we all have Harry
plonked... ewwwwwww..



What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron.

"What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron."

A beautifully example of a liberal argument. and they wonder why people
have problems with liberal thinking.


It makes no sense to debate uneducated, ill-informed morons like The Freak.

In article , says...

H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:


All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of
binary thinking.
So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly
believe it's really happening????

http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html

http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/


Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man
made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.
What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads
in the sand when it comes to global warming.

No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting
when you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you
really look at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried
is as bad as me suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read
up on it, and have simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides
insulting me and the folks on my side is why we all have Harry
plonked... ewwwwwww..



What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron.

"What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron."

A beautifully example of a liberal argument. and they wonder why people
have problems with liberal thinking.

You haven't killfiled this idiot yet? Seriously, if everyone completely
ignored him he would probably go nuts and eat his widdew capguns.
Indeed, the world would be a better place..

--
Wafa free since 2009

JustWait wrote:
In article , says...
H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of
binary thinking.
So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly
believe it's really happening????

http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html

http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/


Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man
made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.
What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads
in the sand when it comes to global warming.
No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting
when you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you
really look at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried
is as bad as me suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read
up on it, and have simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides
insulting me and the folks on my side is why we all have Harry
plonked... ewwwwwww..


What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron.
"What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron."

A beautifully example of a liberal argument. and they wonder why people
have problems with liberal thinking.

You haven't killfiled this idiot yet? Seriously, if everyone completely
ignored him he would probably go nuts and eat his widdew capguns.
Indeed, the world would be a better place..



Moron.

Keith Nuttle wrote:
H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:


All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of
binary thinking.
So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly
believe it's really happening????

http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html

http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/


Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man
made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of
binary thinking.
What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective
heads in the sand when it comes to global warming.

No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting
when you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you
really look at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried
is as bad as me suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read
up on it, and have simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides
insulting me and the folks on my side is why we all have Harry
plonked... ewwwwwww..



What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron.

"What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else?
You're a moron."

A beautifully example of a liberal argument. and they wonder why people
have problems with liberal thinking.

There's the typical ALL liberals think alike speak.
Does that mean that ALL conservatives think and act alike also?

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John II wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

J. Leo wrote:
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world?s rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually
believed the entire earth was warming, and it was going to create a
global catastrophe, they would be 100% behind nuclear power. There are
no green house gases from a nuclear power plant.

Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent global
warming I will accept it for what it is, politics.
I agree with this post.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe
it's really happening????

http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html

http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/

Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man
made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads in
the sand when it comes to global warming.

No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting when
you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you really look
at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried is as bad as me
suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read up on it, and have
simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides insulting me and the
folks on my side is why we all have Harry plonked... ewwwwwww..


The difference is this. I've based my belief on science. I've studied
both sides. I haven't however, based my belief on what one political
party says.