| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
That damned Clinton
In article ,
says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? -- Wafa free since 2009 |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That damned Clinton
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That damned Clinton
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. I just don't know what you think we are saying that is negative, what was it? All we are saying it "it isn't a cold call, issues were pre- arranged". As it should be, these are countries involved, not individuals. It shouldn't be left to any one person, democrat or republican... He did exactly as he should of with his role in this rescue. I give him nothing but credit. I always kinda' liked Bill, even if I don't agree with his politics... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That damned Clinton
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. I just don't know what you think we are saying that is negative, what was it? All we are saying it "it isn't a cold call, issues were pre- arranged". As it should be, these are countries involved, not individuals. It shouldn't be left to any one person, democrat or republican... He did exactly as he should of with his role in this rescue. I give him nothing but credit. I always kinda' liked Bill, even if I don't agree with his politics... I for one, commend the man for what he done. You do realize that he put his ass right in the line of fire, don't you? The North Koreans could have just took him and did whatever they wanted. But what do all of the conservatives say? All of the remarks were no where near "it isn't a cold call". More like *we probably gave him rights to build all of the nukes he wants* kind of bull****. Funny, a lot of the remarks I heard here yesterday completely parroted Hannity when I listened to him on the way home. Face it. Nothing a liberal does will ever please some people, simply because it's a liberal. Hide it under a thin veil, and it's Harryopposite. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That damned Clinton
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:40:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. I just don't know what you think we are saying that is negative, what was it? All we are saying it "it isn't a cold call, issues were pre- arranged". As it should be, these are countries involved, not individuals. It shouldn't be left to any one person, democrat or republican... He did exactly as he should of with his role in this rescue. I give him nothing but credit. I always kinda' liked Bill, even if I don't agree with his politics... I for one, commend the man for what he done. You do realize that he put his ass right in the line of fire, don't you? The North Koreans could have just took him and did whatever they wanted. But what do all of the conservatives say? All of the remarks were no where near "it isn't a cold call". More like *we probably gave him rights to build all of the nukes he wants* kind of bull****. Funny, a lot of the remarks I heard here yesterday completely parroted Hannity when I listened to him on the way home. Face it. Nothing a liberal does will ever please some people, simply because it's a liberal. Hide it under a thin veil, and it's Harryopposite. I wonder if Hannity said, "Wow, that's the same thing those folks on rec.boats were saying!" Yes, the North Koreans could have just "took him and did whatever they wanted". But then they wouldn't benefit from any promises made during any negotiations, would they? Diplomacy is not a one-way street. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That damned Clinton
Another John wrote:
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:40:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. I just don't know what you think we are saying that is negative, what was it? All we are saying it "it isn't a cold call, issues were pre- arranged". As it should be, these are countries involved, not individuals. It shouldn't be left to any one person, democrat or republican... He did exactly as he should of with his role in this rescue. I give him nothing but credit. I always kinda' liked Bill, even if I don't agree with his politics... I for one, commend the man for what he done. You do realize that he put his ass right in the line of fire, don't you? The North Koreans could have just took him and did whatever they wanted. But what do all of the conservatives say? All of the remarks were no where near "it isn't a cold call". More like *we probably gave him rights to build all of the nukes he wants* kind of bull****. Funny, a lot of the remarks I heard here yesterday completely parroted Hannity when I listened to him on the way home. Face it. Nothing a liberal does will ever please some people, simply because it's a liberal. Hide it under a thin veil, and it's Harryopposite. I wonder if Hannity said, "Wow, that's the same thing those folks on rec.boats were saying!" Yes, the North Koreans could have just "took him and did whatever they wanted". But then they wouldn't benefit from any promises made during any negotiations, would they? Diplomacy is not a one-way street. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. What promises? |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That damned Clinton
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. I just don't know what you think we are saying that is negative, what was it? All we are saying it "it isn't a cold call, issues were pre- arranged". As it should be, these are countries involved, not individuals. It shouldn't be left to any one person, democrat or republican... He did exactly as he should of with his role in this rescue. I give him nothing but credit. I always kinda' liked Bill, even if I don't agree with his politics... I for one, commend the man for what he done. You do realize that he put his ass right in the line of fire, don't you? The North Koreans could have just took him and did whatever they wanted. But what do all of the conservatives say? All of the remarks were no where near "it isn't a cold call". More like *we probably gave him rights to build all of the nukes he wants* kind of bull****. Funny, a lot of the remarks I heard here yesterday completely parroted Hannity when I listened to him on the way home. Face it. Nothing a liberal does will ever please some people, simply because it's a liberal. Hide it under a thin veil, and it's Harryopposite. I think I need to take action here... I fart in your general direction.. I will state right here that I have voted for more democrats than republicans in my 30 years of voting for president... So, take it for what it's worth... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That damned Clinton
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. I just don't know what you think we are saying that is negative, what was it? All we are saying it "it isn't a cold call, issues were pre- arranged". As it should be, these are countries involved, not individuals. It shouldn't be left to any one person, democrat or republican... He did exactly as he should of with his role in this rescue. I give him nothing but credit. I always kinda' liked Bill, even if I don't agree with his politics... I for one, commend the man for what he done. So do I.. You do realize that he put his ass right in the line of fire, don't you? Yup. The North Koreans could have just took him and did whatever they wanted. But what do all of the conservatives say? All of the remarks were no where near "it isn't a cold call". Mine were. More like *we probably gave him rights to build all of the nukes he wants* kind of bull****. Funny, a lot of the remarks I heard here yesterday completely parroted Hannity when I listened to him on the way home. Face it. I just didn't see those posts but I have been missing some of them.. But I didn't see any of those. Nothing a liberal does will ever please some people, simply because it's a liberal. Hide it under a thin veil, and it's Harryopposite. -- Wafa free since 2009 |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That damned Clinton
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:29:11 -0400, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote: In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. Show where Clinton was 'dissed'. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Out out damned SPOT! | Cruising | |||
| Damned airboats | General | |||
| Damned gadgets | Cruising | |||
| On Topic: Damned and double damned... | General | |||
| Damned Heat | ASA | |||
![NotNow[_3_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
