On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:08:50 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:48:41 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:21:02 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:20:03 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:12:38 -0500, wrote:

For those having
trouble making sense of all of this please pick up a copy of "How to
call a Horse a Horse for Dummies."

Or maybe just watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0KKGdb4qUY

Heck of a lot easier.

--Vic

Oh, that wasn't Neil Young? No, I remember. That was all about
heroin abuse. (Excellent song, excellent group. Those were the days,
my friend - ala Mary Hopkins.)

It's too bad that these Palin abusers don't have a proper sense of
history or decency. Naturally, their immediate retreat is to the
Republican hypocrisy/family values argument. My only regret is that I
did succomb to the ad hominem in this last note. Still, I'd just as
soon call a horse a horse than pretend that I'm justified in bullying
other persons.


From Shannon More on Huff Post


An appeal to authority? Why should I be skeptical?

Is this supposed to pass for logic? Pray tell what you're referencing
so I may bask in your deep intellect.