Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More good news for America
On Jul 1, 4:48*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com*at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar.... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning *a net profit? * Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. *Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More good news for America
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you. Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in Testaments: "An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question." You know, like "built any boats lately?" |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More good news for America
"HK" wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you. Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in Testaments: "An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question." You know, like "built any boats lately?" Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More good news for America
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you. Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in Testaments: "An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question." You know, like "built any boats lately?" Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message. In justhate's case, the messenger and the message are identical...uninformed idiocy. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More good news for America
"HK" wrote in message ... Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you. Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in Testaments: "An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question." You know, like "built any boats lately?" Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message. In justhate's case, the messenger and the message are identical...uninformed idiocy. I rest my case. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More good news for America
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:24:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you. Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in Testaments: "An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question." You know, like "built any boats lately?" Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message. In justhate's case, the messenger and the message are identical...uninformed idiocy. I rest my case. That'd be foolish Perry, since you'd lose. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Good news for America from the WSJ! | General | |||
Good news for America is bad news for the Democrats | ASA | |||
More bad news for Bush, good news for Americans | General | |||
Perception America - good boat? | General | |||
Good news for America | ASA |