In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.

Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?

On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.

Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?

Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.

On Jun 30, 1:48*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:





Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.

Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?

Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You got it! He has shown he's not capable of original thought, that's
why he can only cut and paste, insult and tell lies.

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.

Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?

Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.

That supposes what you've written contains reason. Big leap.

jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 30, 1:33 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.
Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?
Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.

That supposes what you've written contains reason. Big leap.

An impossible leap, which is why I don't do what he wants.

On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch





wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.

Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?

Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.

That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way...

On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote:



On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.

Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?

Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.

That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way...

OK, DK, prove I lied then. I stand by my assertions that their
supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. If
you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong.

Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.
Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?

Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


Froggy, your "political posts" read as if the person making them were
eating desert mushrooms. Why would you expect me to take your
"reasoning" seriously?

Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.
Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?

Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.

And lie...