Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:58:11 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote: On Jun 24, 1:36Â*pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:13:22 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: So, we do NOT have an answer. Â*Consider that if I build a boat I have complete control over how to do it EXCEPT, I will not use a bracket. I would consider deep transom cutouts on either side or large scuppers. Consider, my boat has filled about 9' of rainwater sitting in my yard when I left the drain plug in. Â*With the small 750 gph pump, it took over 10 minutes to pump it out. Â*If I had the largest capacity pump I can get, 3500 gph, it would take nearly 1.5 minutes, a long time, so some type of scupper seems necessary for the eventuality of getting her nearly swamped. Here's a link I posted about a year ago. Watch the vid (it's not long) and listen to this guy. I think he knows a lot about it. I like the one-way transom "doors" solution. There's a shot of them near the end of the vid.http://www.boattest.com/VLibrary/vPlay.aspx?ID=1216 --Vic Again, Harry has stated that Parker offers the dam as an option. If the cut out transom is so safe, why in hell does Parker offer it at all? I'd think it would be litigious to offer an option that makes the boat less safe. Assuming you're not just doing your obsessive Harry slagging, I can think of some reasons a person wants the dam: 1. Boater always on calm water, but wants short shaft OB. Doesn't like the looks of the empty space at the cutout. 2. Boater on all waters, doesn't care about swamping, because dry feet is his priority. Probably missed some. Why do you care? Are you a boater? --Vic |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
transom seal | Boat Building | |||
Why one needs a full transom. | General | |||
Transom too low | General | |||
OSS transom bevels | Boat Building | |||
cutaway transoms | Cruising |