Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:51:21 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:08:10 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

"Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no
way are to be considered flaws or defects
You missed some.
I'd say he missed a lot.
I missed what you meant by that statement. Is that a complement?

Why would we discuss geometry?

Wait - what are we discussing?

That is what is wrong with you old guys, you can't follow a simple
thread.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:14:14 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:51:21 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:08:10 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

"Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no
way are to be considered flaws or defects
You missed some.
I'd say he missed a lot.
I missed what you meant by that statement. Is that a complement?

Why would we discuss geometry?

Wait - what are we discussing?

That is what is wrong with you old guys, you can't follow a simple
thread.

Old Timer's Disease.

Well, that and we confuse easily.