http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco


Smart company...

--
Republican conservatism is so far out of the mainstream, it is serving
as a drainage ditch somewhere.

HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco


Smart company...

It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

Keith Nuttle wrote:
HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco


Smart company...

It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

D'oh...there are many places where winds are reasonably available and
reasonably predictable. A wind turbine does not have to operate 24-7 to
make sense.




--
Republican conservatism is so far out of the mainstream, it is serving
as a drainage ditch somewhere.

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:


It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

That may be a good argument against sailboats. It's not a good argument
against wind power.

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco


Smart company...

It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
their electricity from nuclear energy!
--
John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill

HK wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote:
HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco


Smart company...

It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

D'oh...there are many places where winds are reasonably available and
reasonably predictable. A wind turbine does not have to operate 24-7 to
make sense.




It does to be a reliable source of energy. There is a narrow band of
wind speeds where a windmill can operate. To high of speeds and the
windmill suffers physical damage. To low and there is not enough energy
to turn the prop. Why do you think windmills were abandon 200 years
ago as a source power?

The carbon capture program is designed to outlaw the burning of carbon
based fuels. Its chemistry; for each pound of carbon burned about 4
pounds of Carbon Dioxide are produced. Or, if captured with lime, for
every rail car delivering coal, 5 rail cars of carbonates will leave for
disposal.

Once carbon fueled energy is removed you Must replace it with a
continuous, reliable energy source like Nuclear power plants. There are
no practical alternatives to mass, continuous, reliable, power production.

John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco



Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
their electricity from nuclear energy!
--
John H

Stupid like a fox.

On Jun 17, 11:02*am, Keith Nuttle wrote:
HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco

Smart company...

It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

Just because the windmill may not produce constant power at a constant
rate doesn't make unfeasable. And no, the scientists and engineers
don't think the windmills will produce energy when the wind's not
blowing. Seems sort of silly to answer that question because most
would know the answer, but you asked......

On Jun 17, 12:22*pm, Gene Kearns
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith wrote:

||HK wrote:

|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

--
Agent 5.00 Build 1171

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

I'm all for most forms of non polluting, non fossil fuel power. I
would have to think that with a good solid nuclear power program the
price would go down. I wonder if it's the norm for people that are
using nuclear power to pay more? I know that Georgia has some nuke
plants operating, and want to build more. But we only get one bill
from a co-op so I don't know.

On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns





wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants. Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.


So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...cts-report.pdf