On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:21:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Jun 18, 8:25*am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Jun 17, 4:31*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:19:23 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker

wrote:
On Jun 17, 3:55*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker

wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns

wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants? Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.

So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...e-impacts-repo...

Loogy, go back and re-read my post. I make no proclamations about the
validity of Al Gore's claims.

You certainly have in the past, I didn't know your stance had changed,
although I'm glad it has!

I made no comments about my stance one way or the other. Read the
post.

I asked questions.

--
John H

As I said, you have many times before, right here in rec.boats made a
stance and negated the validity of Gore's claims.

I asked questions, which you have yet to address. Why? They're valid
questions.

As to Gore's claims - they are pure adulterated bull**** with almost
no basis in science. Many, many very gullible people believe them,
which is why Gore is making a big fortune. How much have you
contributed to his companies?
--
John H


I take it you didn't bother reading the entire NOAA findings?

I take it you can't answer my questions?
--

John H