| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#41
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 27, 9:35*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? It's too bad the ejaculates who whine about the RAV4 know very little about it. Car and Driver magazine likes it: "The RAV4 is a C/D favorite, having won a recent comparison test of eight of its competitors as well as back-to-back 5Best Trucks awards. What we like most about the RAV4 is its refined, carlike demeanor. Available in front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, the RAV4 isn’t exactly ready to conquer serious off-road trails, but its ground clearance and all-wheel drive do allow it to tackle inclement weather with ease. The excellent fuel economy of the four-cylinder, decent driving dynamics, and massive interior space put the RAV4 at the head of its class. The V-6–powered model is a rocket, but may be overkill for most buyers." Consumer Reports has it at the top of the small SUVs and at least two Canadian cable auto programs rate it tops. Johnny & his Dope Army irregulars are probably stuck in the 1st or 2nd generation version. Mine is the 3rd generation and this year they gave us a larger engine with 13 more horsepower. Johnny PrepH may not know that my '09 RAV4 4 cylinder has 26% more power than my old Plymouth Voyager with it's 3.0 V6 and 21% more than my '06 Ranger PU with its 3.0 V6.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - From Popular Mechanics magazine: http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...s/1270976.html Which says in part: Cute, reliable and loaded with personality, the RAV4 seems to appeal especially to women–at least based on the results of our questionnaire. In our survey, female owners/drivers outnumbered their male counterparts by a 2:1 ratio Yeah, that sounds manly! From http://au.toyotaownersclub.com/forum...howtopic=21311 I've always seen a Rav4 as a hairdressers car? But it has been changing recently Yeah, that's manly! From: http://www.roadandtravel.com/roadtes...e/2002rav4.htm The RAV4 of the late nineties was one of the earliest of the new generation of compact SUVs, its cutesy looks and frugal powertrain striking a popular chord with sorority girls and single moms everywhere, and within months challenging the VW Cabriolet for its "chick-car" tiara. HEEEEHEEE!!!!! From: http://www.cars.com/go/crp/research....&revlogtype=22 Toyota says about 65 percent of RAV4 buyers are expected to be women ages 25-45 Need any more? |
|
#42
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 28, 8:06*am, wrote:
On May 27, 9:35*pm, "Don White" wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Don White wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? It's too bad the ejaculates who whine about the RAV4 know very little about it. Car and Driver magazine likes it: "The RAV4 is a C/D favorite, having won a recent comparison test of eight of its competitors as well as back-to-back 5Best Trucks awards. What we like most about the RAV4 is its refined, carlike demeanor. Available in front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, the RAV4 isn’t exactly ready to conquer serious off-road trails, but its ground clearance and all-wheel drive do allow it to tackle inclement weather with ease. The excellent fuel economy of the four-cylinder, decent driving dynamics, and massive interior space put the RAV4 at the head of its class. The V-6–powered model is a rocket, but may be overkill for most buyers." Consumer Reports has it at the top of the small SUVs and at least two Canadian cable auto programs rate it tops. Johnny & his Dope Army irregulars are probably stuck in the 1st or 2nd generation version. Mine is the 3rd generation and this year they gave us a larger engine with 13 more horsepower. Johnny PrepH may not know that my '09 RAV4 4 cylinder has 26% more power than my old Plymouth Voyager with it's 3.0 V6 and 21% more than my '06 Ranger PU with its 3.0 V6.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - From Popular Mechanics magazine:http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...s/1270976.html Which says in part: Cute, reliable and loaded with personality, the RAV4 seems to appeal especially to women–at least based on the results of our questionnaire. In our survey, female owners/drivers outnumbered their male counterparts by a 2:1 ratio Yeah, that sounds manly! Fromhttp://au.toyotaownersclub.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=21311 I've always seen a Rav4 as a hairdressers car? But it has been changing recently Yeah, that's manly! From:http://www.roadandtravel.com/roadtes...2buyersguide/2... The RAV4 of the late nineties was one of the earliest of the new generation of compact SUVs, its cutesy looks and frugal powertrain striking a popular chord with sorority girls and single moms everywhere, and within months challenging the VW Cabriolet for its "chick-car" tiara. HEEEEHEEE!!!!! From:http://www.cars.com/go/crp/research....&makeid=47&mod... Toyota says about 65 percent of RAV4 buyers are expected to be women ages 25-45 Need any more?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL... |
|
#44
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 28, 8:27*am, HK wrote:
wrote: On May 28, 8:06 am, wrote: On May 27, 9:35 pm, "Don White" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news:656dnVq7MZk6VoDXnZ2dnUVZ_hhi4p2d@earthlink .com... Don White wrote: "John H" wrote in message om... snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? It's too bad the ejaculates who whine about the RAV4 know very little about it. Car and Driver magazine likes it: "The RAV4 is a C/D favorite, having won a recent comparison test of eight of its competitors as well as back-to-back 5Best Trucks awards. What we like most about the RAV4 is its refined, carlike demeanor. Available in front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, the RAV4 isn’t exactly ready to conquer serious off-road trails, but its ground clearance and all-wheel drive do allow it to tackle inclement weather with ease. The excellent fuel economy of the four-cylinder, decent driving dynamics, and massive interior space put the RAV4 at the head of its class. The V-6–powered model is a rocket, but may be overkill for most buyers." Consumer Reports has it at the top of the small SUVs and at least two Canadian cable auto programs rate it tops. Johnny & his Dope Army irregulars are probably stuck in the 1st or 2nd generation version. Mine is the 3rd generation and this year they gave us a larger engine with 13 more horsepower. Johnny PrepH may not know that my '09 RAV4 4 cylinder has 26% more power than my old Plymouth Voyager with it's 3.0 V6 and 21% more than my '06 Ranger PU with its 3.0 V6.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - From Popular Mechanics magazine:http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...s/1270976.html Which says in part: Cute, reliable and loaded with personality, the RAV4 seems to appeal especially to women–at least based on the results of our questionnaire. In our survey, female owners/drivers outnumbered their male counterparts by a 2:1 ratio Yeah, that sounds manly! Fromhttp://au.toyotaownersclub.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=21311 I've always seen a Rav4 as a hairdressers car? But it has been changing recently Yeah, that's manly! From:http://www.roadandtravel.com/roadtes...2buyersguide/2... The RAV4 of the late nineties was one of the earliest of the new generation of compact SUVs, its cutesy looks and frugal powertrain striking a popular chord with sorority girls and single moms everywhere, and within months challenging the VW Cabriolet for its "chick-car" tiara. HEEEEHEEE!!!!! From:http://www.cars.com/go/crp/research....&makeid=47&mod... Toyota says about 65 percent of RAV4 buyers are expected to be women ages 25-45 Need any more?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL... What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station wagon?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brand new Dodge Quad Cab, dark blue. Tow package that includes larger alternator, larger radiator, upgraded brakes, and stiffer leaf springs. Bed liner, and Truxedo bed cover. |
|
#45
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
"HK" wrote in message ... What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station wagon? What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars, especially the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt laden MA. They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold onto it. Eisboch |
|
#46
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station wagon? What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars, especially the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt laden MA. They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold onto it. Eisboch Nothing wrong with it, unless you are making ****ty remarks about a new Toyota. The Ford is not a car I would own, but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. |
|
#47
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
"HK" wrote in message m... ........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you. Eisboch |
|
#48
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... ........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you. Eisboch It shouldn't. I'm all for diversity of opinion. As an example, while I disagee with you on many points political, I don't begrudge you holding those views, nor do I think you should adopt my views, unless you want to do so, and vice versa. Note that I don't get "upset" with you because of your views, though you sometimes get upset with me because of my views. As an example, *I* am pro-choice. But a lot of people in this country are not. Well, I wouldn't pretend to shove my views on that topic down their throats. I expect the same courtesy from them. I want no impediments place in front of women who want an abortion. If someone is opposed to abortion, I want no legislation passed that would force them to get one. On the other hand, I am also anti-torture, and I want legal impediments placed in front of anyone in authority who would engage in it. I could present a detailed rationale for each of my positions, but this is, after all, rec.boats, and it makes no sense to dangle thoughts in front of the likes of JustHate, Loogy, and the rest of the retards. |
|
#49
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station wagon? What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars, especially the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt laden MA. They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold onto it. Eisboch Nothing wrong with it, unless you are making ****ty remarks about a new Toyota. The Ford is not a car I would own, but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. Hold onto that last thought. Coming from you, it's a gem. |
|
#50
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... ........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you. Eisboch It shouldn't. I'm all for diversity of opinion. As an example, while I disagee with you on many points political, I don't begrudge you holding those views, nor do I think you should adopt my views, unless you want to do so, and vice versa. Note that I don't get "upset" with you because of your views, though you sometimes get upset with me because of my views. As an example, *I* am pro-choice. But a lot of people in this country are not. Well, I wouldn't pretend to shove my views on that topic down their throats. I expect the same courtesy from them. I want no impediments place in front of women who want an abortion. If someone is opposed to abortion, I want no legislation passed that would force them to get one. On the other hand, I am also anti-torture, and I want legal impediments placed in front of anyone in authority who would engage in it. I could present a detailed rationale for each of my positions, but this is, after all, rec.boats, and it makes no sense to dangle thoughts in front of the likes of JustHate, Loogy, and the rest of the retards. Great idea. Why don't you go dangle your thoughts somewhere else. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| For you golfers... | General | |||
| Dream getaway of a lifetime! | Cruising | |||
| You golfers need to join the UAW | General | |||
| Buy of a lifetime. One of you must have the funds | Tall Ship Photos | |||
| trip of the lifetime to Himalayan rivers. | General | |||
Linear Mode
