jim7856 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:



Here you go, **** for brains...


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...M4256x2832.jpg

How do we know this an authentic Krause photo? Take another one with
your chewed up thumbnail in the corner of the shot.

The problem with all cameras is they have a tendency to make Harry hands
look like a fat Virginia Ham, with the fat rolling off of his wrist and
the fingers nails nibble to the nub from stress. I think it has
something to do with the field of focus, depth of field, lens compress
or the angle of the dangle.

In fact, Harry is very svelte and in perfect physical and mental health.
Damn camera.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Tue, 19 May 2009 09:24:49 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jim7856 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:



Here you go, **** for brains...


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...M4256x2832.jpg

How do we know this an authentic Krause photo? Take another one with
your chewed up thumbnail in the corner of the shot.

The problem with all cameras is they have a tendency to make Harry hands
look like a fat Virginia Ham, with the fat rolling off of his wrist and
the fingers nails nibble to the nub from stress. I think it has
something to do with the field of focus, depth of field, lens compress
or the angle of the dangle.

In fact, Harry is very svelte and in perfect physical and mental health.
Damn camera.

You're obsessed with Harry.

Do you fantasize about sucking on his plump Virginia Ham hands?