Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 May 2009 18:51:25 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 18 May 2009 05:52:55 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote: On Sun, 17 May 2009 22:32:37 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... Tell me again why we're dumping billions down this rat hole? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Harvard, Obama Harvard, Bush Harvard, Wagoner Is that a hint? Er....good point. Except that Bush was at Yale, courtesy of daddy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush Look down to the right, Harvard and Yale. Banks do Yale mostly. Check the bailout section. No ****. Amazing. The guy must have paid others to take write papers and take tests. It's obvious he couldn't get through school on his own merits. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 May 2009 22:52:33 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: Tell me again why we're dumping billions down this rat hole? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18/bu....html?_r=1&hpw A good line... "Others, like Harley Shaiken, at the University of California, Berkeley, argue that if G.M. focused more intensely on technology and auto quality, it could concentrate production in the United States and still be competitive." I wonder why G.M. couldn't focus more intensely on technology and auto quality and *still* produce cars in Mexico and China? -- John H |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 May 2009 06:56:21 -0400, John H wrote:
I wonder why G.M. couldn't focus more intensely on technology and auto quality and *still* produce cars in *snip* China? From the people that brought you melamine in baby formula? You buy one first. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 May 2009 07:28:05 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Mon, 18 May 2009 06:56:21 -0400, John H wrote: I wonder why G.M. couldn't focus more intensely on technology and auto quality and *still* produce cars in *snip* China? From the people that brought you melamine in baby formula? You buy one first. Well, the UAW have been building them for years. Look where they've gotten GM. -- John H |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... Tell me again why we're dumping billions down this rat hole? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Just last week GMy closed a truck manufacturing plant in Ontario. I think the Canadian gov't should forget about stuffing billions into this dead horse and encourage the best of the Asian companies to build plants here. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... Tell me again why we're dumping billions down this rat hole? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Just last week GMy closed a truck manufacturing plant in Ontario. I think the Canadian gov't should forget about stuffing billions into this dead horse and encourage the best of the Asian companies to build plants here. The Asian automanufacturers will go where the labor laws are most favorable. This means as far away from the UAW/CAW as they can get. The European and Asian auto manufacturers have already proven that there is a viable non-union workforce in the southeastern US. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BAR" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... Tell me again why we're dumping billions down this rat hole? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Just last week GMy closed a truck manufacturing plant in Ontario. I think the Canadian gov't should forget about stuffing billions into this dead horse and encourage the best of the Asian companies to build plants here. The Asian automanufacturers will go where the labor laws are most favorable. This means as far away from the UAW/CAW as they can get. The European and Asian auto manufacturers have already proven that there is a viable non-union workforce in the southeastern US. Interesting...a national cable tv program called 'Car Business' did an item on the new billion dollar assembly plant in Woodstock Ontario. Yes...this is a Toyota plant producing RAV4s' for the North American market. (my RAV4 was assembled there) Seems it was planned to have 3 shifts pumping our 200K SUVs per year but the downturn has them operating one shift producing 70K RAV4s'. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... Tell me again why we're dumping billions down this rat hole? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Just last week GMy closed a truck manufacturing plant in Ontario. I think the Canadian gov't should forget about stuffing billions into this dead horse and encourage the best of the Asian companies to build plants here. The Asian automanufacturers will go where the labor laws are most favorable. This means as far away from the UAW/CAW as they can get. The European and Asian auto manufacturers have already proven that there is a viable non-union workforce in the southeastern US. Interesting...a national cable tv program called 'Car Business' did an item on the new billion dollar assembly plant in Woodstock Ontario. Yes...this is a Toyota plant producing RAV4s' for the North American market. (my RAV4 was assembled there) Seems it was planned to have 3 shifts pumping our 200K SUVs per year but the downturn has them operating one shift producing 70K RAV4s'. That's not the economy. It's the lack of interest in RAV4's. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BAR" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... Tell me again why we're dumping billions down this rat hole? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Just last week GMy closed a truck manufacturing plant in Ontario. I think the Canadian gov't should forget about stuffing billions into this dead horse and encourage the best of the Asian companies to build plants here. The Asian automanufacturers will go where the labor laws are most favorable. This means as far away from the UAW/CAW as they can get. The European and Asian auto manufacturers have already proven that there is a viable non-union workforce in the southeastern US. They will go where they can get a favorable position on cost, efficiency and quality with a view that is longer than Wagoner's nose. Practicing business the way it should be. Something the CAW/UAW will never understand while they have their hands out for taxpayers moneys. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 18, 9:01*am, "Don White" wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in messagenews:m9j115hkqmtuaio5osv99dd5fa2igoj1p7@4ax .com... Tell me again why we're dumping billions down this rat hole? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Just last week GMy closed a truck manufacturing plant in Ontario. I think the Canadian gov't should forget about stuffing billions into this dead horse and encourage the best of the Asian companies to build plants here. What is GMy, dummy? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A new war to wage | ASA | |||
Cheney Seeks 6th Deferment | General | |||
Cities/regions with Ocean Access? | General | |||
minimum wage thought | ASA | |||
wm seeks female for boating | General |