"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 May 2009 22:17:03 -0400, BAR wrote:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/cap...riefed_on.html

This was in the news many weeks ago. Her take was that they were
briefed on the methods but were never told the methods were being
used.

I don't know if she asked specifically or those who were briefing her
assumed that she'd make the connection.

I assume she's being purposefully dense in order to keep that teflon
coating intact. Like a tobacco CEO who doesn't dare acknowledge the
concept of using his products and cancer.



Have you watched the recent interviews on TV of Pelosi regarding this
subject?
She doesn't lie very well. Tongue tied and evasive.
She is a piece of work, that's for sure.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 May 2009 22:17:03 -0400, BAR wrote:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/cap...riefed_on.html


This was in the news many weeks ago. Her take was that they were
briefed on the methods but were never told the methods were being
used.

I don't know if she asked specifically or those who were briefing her
assumed that she'd make the connection.

I assume she's being purposefully dense in order to keep that teflon
coating intact. Like a tobacco CEO who doesn't dare acknowledge the
concept of using his products and cancer.



Have you watched the recent interviews on TV of Pelosi regarding this
subject?
She doesn't lie very well. Tongue tied and evasive.
She is a piece of work, that's for sure.

Eisboch

How do these incompetent, dishonest boobs keep getting reelected?

On Fri, 8 May 2009 03:03:14 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 07 May 2009 22:17:03 -0400, BAR wrote:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/cap...riefed_on.html

This was in the news many weeks ago. Her take was that they were
briefed on the methods but were never told the methods were being
used.

I don't know if she asked specifically or those who were briefing her
assumed that she'd make the connection.

I assume she's being purposefully dense in order to keep that teflon
coating intact. Like a tobacco CEO who doesn't dare acknowledge the
concept of using his products and cancer.



Have you watched the recent interviews on TV of Pelosi regarding this
subject?
She doesn't lie very well. Tongue tied and evasive.
She is a piece of work, that's for sure.

Eisboch

Allow me two words -- Tom DeLay.

On Fri, 08 May 2009 12:23:24 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 8 May 2009 03:03:14 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 07 May 2009 22:17:03 -0400, BAR wrote:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/cap...riefed_on.html

This was in the news many weeks ago. Her take was that they were
briefed on the methods but were never told the methods were being
used.

I don't know if she asked specifically or those who were briefing her
assumed that she'd make the connection.

I assume she's being purposefully dense in order to keep that teflon
coating intact. Like a tobacco CEO who doesn't dare acknowledge the
concept of using his products and cancer.



Have you watched the recent interviews on TV of Pelosi regarding this
subject?
She doesn't lie very well. Tongue tied and evasive.
She is a piece of work, that's for sure.

Eisboch

Allow me two words -- Tom DeLay.

What the hell do your utterances about the past have to do with the
lieing Pelosi, Reid, Obama, et al?

Is that your position - any action previously performed is OK for
repition? Is that really the best you can come up with?

Pretty flaky.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm