Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Thu, 7 May 2009 10:57:09 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Oh well. It was nice having a backup system to GPS, but it looks like it's dead. I think it was Clinton who tried to dump it before but it was retained due to an overwhelming protest by the military, commercial transportation operations and the general boating/aviation public. GPS can be jammed. LORAN is much more difficult to jam. I've used both and although GPS is very good, I always liked the reliability of LORAN. I agree. It's a mistake. In my opinion, instead of the minor "savings" by eliminating it, they should upgrade it and promote it as a backup system to the extremely vunerable GPS system. And after watching "The One" in his "cost savings announcement", I'd just like to say that it's much like telling your wife that your going out to buy a $100,000 Mercedes and coming home with a $20,000 Toyota. You "saved" $80,000. :) This administration is brain dead. I don't think they are thinking it though. Virtually every commercial fisherman in my area and a large percentage of charter boat captains still use and prefer LORAN to GPS. Eisboch |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
old ray jefferson L-400 loran; need help with | Electronics | |||
Loran C | General | |||
loran | Cruising | |||
Loran vs GPS | Electronics | |||
Loran vs GPS | General |