Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:52:21 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news

The Dems can have Specter. He'll be a credit to the party, I am sure.
(barf)
He has only one thing and one person's interests in mind and to
hell with
anyone else, Republican or Democrat. Good riddance.

Eisboch



Yes, and Boner, Cantor, McConnell and Gingrich are selfless.

They have nothing to do with it.
Anybody who is a fan of and follows the New England Patriots has no
love for
Arlen Specter.

Eisboch

The Patriots were good enough to win without cheating. If you want to
direct your anger towards someone, I think your man is Belichick.

Have you become sensitive to Republican senators passing judgement on
American's morals?

You don't want to go there. Specter's "morals" had nothing to do with
Belichick and everything to do with his relationship with cable
companies and who butters the bread.

Eisboch


I'm supposed to give a crap about professional football?

On Apr 28, 7:03*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:52:21 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news

The Dems can have Specter. *He'll be a credit to the party, I am sure.
(barf)
He has only one thing and one person's interests *in mind and to
hell with
anyone else, Republican or Democrat. * Good riddance.

Eisboch

Yes, and Boner, Cantor, McConnell and Gingrich are selfless.

They have nothing to do with it.
Anybody who is a fan of and follows the New England Patriots has no
love for
Arlen Specter.

Eisboch

The Patriots were good enough to win without cheating. *If you want to
direct your anger towards someone, I think your man is Belichick.

Have you become sensitive to Republican senators passing judgement on
American's morals?

You don't want to go there. *Specter's "morals" had nothing to do with
Belichick and everything to do with his relationship with cable
companies and who butters the bread.

Eisboch

I'm supposed to give a crap about professional football?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's all about principal and moral core.. you wouldn't understand...

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:52:21 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news

The Dems can have Specter. He'll be a credit to the party, I am
sure.
(barf)
He has only one thing and one person's interests in mind and to hell
with
anyone else, Republican or Democrat. Good riddance.

Eisboch



Yes, and Boner, Cantor, McConnell and Gingrich are selfless.

They have nothing to do with it.
Anybody who is a fan of and follows the New England Patriots has no
love for
Arlen Specter.

Eisboch

The Patriots were good enough to win without cheating. If you want to
direct your anger towards someone, I think your man is Belichick.

Have you become sensitive to Republican senators passing judgement on
American's morals?

You don't want to go there. Specter's "morals" had nothing to do with
Belichick and everything to do with his relationship with cable companies
and who butters the bread.

Eisboch


I'm supposed to give a crap about professional football?


Didn't ask you.

I got a kick out of something. Believe it or not, I am really not a
political hack and don't pay a lot of attention to the games that are played
or the backroom deals. But over the years a few politicians have imprinted
either a very positive or a very negative impression in my mind for one
reason or another. Not all Dems are negative and not all Republicans are
positive. But Specter has always impressed me as someone who takes care of
Specter, first and foremost, and he's reinforcing that image again.

Turns out, from listening to many of the comments coming from both sides of
the political spectrum, my impression is not a unique one. The Dems are
taking to him like a little kid used to take castor oil. Smells and
tastes like crap, but overall, it's good for you.

I guess.

Eisboch

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:36:48 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...
Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:52:21 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news

The Dems can have Specter. He'll be a credit to the party, I am
sure.
(barf)
He has only one thing and one person's interests in mind and to hell
with
anyone else, Republican or Democrat. Good riddance.

Eisboch



Yes, and Boner, Cantor, McConnell and Gingrich are selfless.

They have nothing to do with it.
Anybody who is a fan of and follows the New England Patriots has no
love for
Arlen Specter.

Eisboch

The Patriots were good enough to win without cheating. If you want to
direct your anger towards someone, I think your man is Belichick.

Have you become sensitive to Republican senators passing judgement on
American's morals?

You don't want to go there. Specter's "morals" had nothing to do with
Belichick and everything to do with his relationship with cable companies
and who butters the bread.

Eisboch


I'm supposed to give a crap about professional football?


Didn't ask you.

I got a kick out of something. Believe it or not, I am really not a
political hack and don't pay a lot of attention to the games that are played
or the backroom deals. But over the years a few politicians have imprinted
either a very positive or a very negative impression in my mind for one
reason or another. Not all Dems are negative and not all Republicans are
positive. But Specter has always impressed me as someone who takes care of
Specter, first and foremost, and he's reinforcing that image again.

Turns out, from listening to many of the comments coming from both sides of
the political spectrum, my impression is not a unique one. The Dems are
taking to him like a little kid used to take castor oil. Smells and
tastes like crap, but overall, it's good for you.

I guess.

Eisboch

It's part of political life to take care of yourself if you hope to
survive. They are all opportunists, it's the nature of the beast.

"jps" wrote in message
...


It's part of political life to take care of yourself if you hope to
survive. They are all opportunists, it's the nature of the beast.

Two words.

"Term Limits"


Eisboch

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:06:25 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .


It's part of political life to take care of yourself if you hope to
survive. They are all opportunists, it's the nature of the beast.

Two words.

"Term Limits"


Eisboch

It's the same argument you've been hearing from Wall Street. Restrict
us and you'll get inferior talent.

Politics is a career, not a hobby.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:06:25 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..


It's part of political life to take care of yourself if you hope to
survive. They are all opportunists, it's the nature of the beast.

Two words.

"Term Limits"


Eisboch

It's the same argument you've been hearing from Wall Street. Restrict
us and you'll get inferior talent.


Impossible.

Eisboch

On Apr 28, 4:38*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:08:12 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Apr 28, 1:59*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:03:28 -0400, HK wrote:
wrote:
As opposed to a criminal congress bought and paid for by big
corporations like GE and lazy union bitches... I guess your ideal
government is one that doesn't reach across the isle, do business in
the open, or allow free speech... America as we know it is ****ed.
Time to stock up on ammo...

What are you going to do with the ammo? If you fill out the federal form
honestly, you won't be able to buy a handgun.

This is just the sort of imbalanced jerk that psychological tests for
gun ownership *should ferret out as a threat to himself and others.

my hometown is pittsburgh. having seen what the gun crowd did to
police officers there recently, i'm even more inclined to advocate
repeal of the 2nd amendment. the more i see about gun nuts, the more i
know the 2nd is dangerous for freedom.

The need for militias went out the window when the US decided to
maintain standing armies in the 1950s.

I still consider hunting an honorable pursuit if it's not just for
sport but for sustenance.

The NRA, gun manufacturers and politicians end up protecting
vigilantes. *Until they're personally affected by one of these
paranoid idiots, they'll continue to succumb to political pressure.

What they've allowed is a profusion of weapons, many of which are now
making into the hands of less responsible or ill-intentioned humans.

It's screwed up and out of control.-

well put and true!

On Apr 28, 3:44*pm, wrote:
On Apr 28, 3:33*pm, HK wrote:



wrote:
On Apr 28, 3:19 pm, wrote:
On Apr 28, 2:39 pm, wrote:

On Apr 28, 2:31 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 28, 1:59 pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:03:28 -0400, HK wrote:
wrote:
As opposed to a criminal congress bought and paid for by big
corporations like GE and lazy union bitches... I guess your ideal
government is one that doesn't reach across the isle, do business in
the open, or allow free speech... America as we know it is ****ed.
Time to stock up on ammo...
What are you going to do with the ammo? If you fill out the federal form
honestly, you won't be able to buy a handgun.
This is just the sort of imbalanced jerk that psychological tests for
gun ownership *should ferret out as a threat to himself and others.
Oh yeah, and your lover Harry has even said he would shoot cops if
they came to his door at night.. You really need to be better informed
before you throw around your silly bull****.... So, how do you feel
about Harry having guns? I will expect the usual insults and
deflection, anything but an answer...
No, **** for brains, I never said anything like that. Anyone can come to
my door without a problem. It's what happens after that that matters.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Revisionist history, anyone who reads your bull**** knows what you
said.. *But then again, you are most well known here for being a liar..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yep, he's nothing but a liar. He's been caught red handed in so many
lies he can't keep up with them! He'll be able to come clean soon, if
he has the balls.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Never happen, this place is all he has, he is not man enough to admit
a mistake...

So, we have **** for brains and his shadow, neither of whom can cough up
the b.s. the original **** for brains claimed as a "fact."-


So, **** for brains wants me to go back and google his posts..
snerk Sorry Harry, I have a life,.

Who's " deflecting " now...

On Apr 28, 3:50*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 28, 3:33 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 28, 3:19 pm, wrote:
On Apr 28, 2:39 pm, wrote:
On Apr 28, 2:31 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 28, 1:59 pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:03:28 -0400, HK wrote:
wrote:
As opposed to a criminal congress bought and paid for by big
corporations like GE and lazy union bitches... I guess your ideal
government is one that doesn't reach across the isle, do business in
the open, or allow free speech... America as we know it is ****ed.
Time to stock up on ammo...
What are you going to do with the ammo? If you fill out the federal form
honestly, you won't be able to buy a handgun.
This is just the sort of imbalanced jerk that psychological tests for
gun ownership *should ferret out as a threat to himself and others.
Oh yeah, and your lover Harry has even said he would shoot cops if
they came to his door at night.. You really need to be better informed
before you throw around your silly bull****.... So, how do you feel
about Harry having guns? I will expect the usual insults and
deflection, anything but an answer...
No, **** for brains, I never said anything like that. Anyone can come to
my door without a problem. It's what happens after that that matters.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Revisionist history, anyone who reads your bull**** knows what you
said.. *But then again, you are most well known here for being a liar..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yep, he's nothing but a liar. He's been caught red handed in so many
lies he can't keep up with them! He'll be able to come clean soon, if
he has the balls.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Never happen, this place is all he has, he is not man enough to admit
a mistake...
So, we have **** for brains and his shadow, neither of whom can cough up
the b.s. the original **** for brains claimed as a "fact."

Which is it, by the way? You can't buy a firearm because of prior
convictions or because of psychological problems?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, **** for brains wants me to go back and google his posts.. snerk
Sorry Harry, I have a life, however I guarantee you 90% of the folks
reading know I don't lie here, as well as 98% of the folks here know
you always do...

Pretty good waffle, especially for a dimwit like you. The reality is,
and you know it, you've simply made up another tale about me that suits
your purposes and when push comes to shove, you've got nothing with
which to back it up.

I obey firearms laws. If you are on my front doorstep and knocking, I
might answer and I might not. If you bust in and you're not a uniformed
cop or obviously some other sort of sworn law enforcement type*, you are
going go get your head blown off.

You're a liar.

BTW, which is it for you? Previously conviction or admission or
psychological problems?

* Not bloody likely cops are going to be busting in my door.

They're too busy throwing the Dwarf down the stairs.Is that like "
Dwarf Tossing"?