"JDH" wrote in message
...
z wrote:
On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote:

I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly
threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are

cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee?


There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the
"indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia.

Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like
the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology.

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger"
wrote:

There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the
"indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia.

Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like
the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology.

The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the
Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. Except then
the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti
Roman-Catholic element.

The result will be the same anyhow.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

"Howard Brazee" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger"
wrote:

There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the
"indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from
Siberia.

Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much
like
the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology.

The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the
Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. Except then
the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti
Roman-Catholic element.

The result will be the same anyhow.

Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk reaction by
everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts thrown
in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of
equivocating.

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:11:43 -0700, "Long Ranger"
wrote:

The result will be the same anyhow.

Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk reaction by
everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts thrown
in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of
equivocating.

Read about the cities a century ago.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

On 2009-04-27 19:11:43 -0400, "Long Ranger" said:


"Howard Brazee" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger"
wrote:

There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the
"indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from
Siberia.

Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much
like
the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology.

The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the
Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. Except then
the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti
Roman-Catholic element.

The result will be the same anyhow.

Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk reaction by
everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts thrown
in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of
equivocating.

You yahoo types are soooo funny.

Look in the kitchen of any restaurant, look who is cutting your grass,
look who is cleaning your homes and raising your children!

You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the
Mexicans.

Hypocrites!

--
"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and
carrying the cross." - Sinclair Lewis

On Apr 27, 9:03*pm, Slim wrote:

You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the
Mexicans.


and they kidnap a bunch of africans and bring them over here to be
slaves, and then complain about the low quality of the folks they
enslaved.

z wrote:
On Apr 27, 9:03 pm, Slim wrote:

You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the
Mexicans.


and they kidnap a bunch of africans and bring them over here to be
slaves, and then complain about the low quality of the folks they
enslaved.


Well, they were the ones who got caught. I suppose
those who got away and weren't captured were smarter?

TDD

The Daring Dufas wrote:
z wrote:
On Apr 27, 9:03 pm, Slim wrote:

You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want
the Mexicans.


and they kidnap a bunch of africans and bring them over here to be
slaves, and then complain about the low quality of the folks they
enslaved.


Well, they were the ones who got caught. I suppose
those who got away and weren't captured were smarter?


One interesting question is why Africans weren't raiding the coast of
Portugal and carrying off slaves of their own?

See, there's Africa and there's Africa. One part of Africa built the
pyramids and the Library of Alexandria.

Another part of Africa couldn't even invent the wheel. Or copy it. Or
navigation. Or a written language.

You'd think, that since humans began in the Great Rift Valley, southern
Africans would have a head start with evolution...

Slim wrote:

On 2009-04-27 19:11:43 -0400, "Long Ranger" said:


"Howard Brazee" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger"
wrote:

There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the
"indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from

Siberia.


Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much

like

the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology.


The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the
Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. Except then
the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti
Roman-Catholic element.

The result will be the same anyhow.


Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk
reaction by
everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts
thrown
in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of
equivocating.


You yahoo types are soooo funny.

Look in the kitchen of any restaurant, look who is cutting your grass,
look who is cleaning your homes and raising your children!

You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the
Mexicans.

Hypocrites!


Although many people think that employing an illegal is better than
having a slave, you don't feed them, clothe them or have to be bothered
by injury, sickness and death.

Although those are all good arguments, I disagree, In the long run it
harms the economy, keeps American citizens out of work, and puts an
increasing strain upon our health care and school systems.







--






“Someone said to me, what doesn't kill me makes me stronger,
and my response was, that just means, I need to put more bullet
holes in you!” -- Rev. Shawn Cole

On Apr 27, 7:11*pm, "Long Ranger" wrote:
"Howard Brazee" wrote in message

...





On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger"
wrote:

There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the
"indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from
Siberia.

Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much
like
the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology.

The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the
Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. * Except then
the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti
Roman-Catholic element.

The result will be the same anyhow.

Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk reaction by
everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts thrown
in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of
equivocating.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

oh noes! they'll probably change the name of los angeles to something
mexican!