Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 1:12*pm, thunder wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:01:45 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote: No word yet on when they will start to be open and keep any of the promises they made related to their own administration... Well, of the 500 campaign promises Obama made, PolitiFact.com has him breaking only six promises, and keeping 5 pages worth. *Not bad, IMO considering he's only been in office 3 months. http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/browse/ Well, I don't know how they are rating it, or how they are trimming the info to make it look good, but the important promises such as "reaching over party lines, bills having 5 days for study, openness about admin officials and the waivers, no lobbiests in the admin.. the list goes on, are being ignored... |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:34:09 -0400, HK wrote:
wrote: On Apr 17, 1:12 pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:01:45 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote: No word yet on when they will start to be open and keep any of the promises they made related to their own administration... Well, of the 500 campaign promises Obama made, PolitiFact.com has him breaking only six promises, and keeping 5 pages worth. Not bad, IMO considering he's only been in office 3 months. http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/browse/ Well, I don't know how they are rating it, or how they are trimming the info to make it look good, but the important promises such as "reaching over party lines, bills having 5 days for study, openness about admin officials and the waivers, no lobbiests in the admin.. the list goes on, are being ignored... "The important promises..." According to who? You? An uneducated dum****? Yes, when Obama made genuine attempts to embrace the Republicans, they spit in his face. Eric Cantor got them to agre to vote along party lines before they even listened to Obama's pitch. Bi-partisanship was rebuked by the R's. Now they're feeling the same sick feeling the D's felt - only the R's never invited the D's to participate. The R's said "**** 'em" as soon as they had the majority. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 1:59*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:34:09 -0400, HK wrote: wrote: On Apr 17, 1:12 pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:01:45 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote: No word yet on when they will start to be open and keep any of the promises they made related to their own administration... Well, of the 500 campaign promises Obama made, PolitiFact.com has him breaking only six promises, and keeping 5 pages worth. *Not bad, IMO considering he's only been in office 3 months. http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/browse/ Well, I don't know how they are rating it, or how they are trimming the info to make it look good, but the important promises such as "reaching over party lines, bills having 5 days for study, openness about admin officials and the waivers, no lobbiests in the admin.. the list goes on, are being ignored... "The important promises..." According to who? You? An uneducated dum****? Yes, when Obama made genuine attempts to embrace the Republicans, they spit in his face. *Eric Cantor got them to agre to vote along party lines before they even listened to Obama's pitch. Bi-partisanship was rebuked by the R's. *Now they're feeling the same sick feeling the D's felt - only the R's never invited the D's to participate. *The R's said "**** 'em" as soon as they had the majority.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sitting down, listening, and competely dismissing all ideas and refusing debate or admendments by republicans is not reaching across the isle... Just because Obama, Cobert, Stewart, Gibbs and Obermann said it does not make it true. The repubs were completely shut out, period.. SNIP 5. ADVOCACY OF DOUBLE STANDARDS. Extremists generally tend to judge themselves or their interest group in terms of their intentions, which they tend to view very generously, and others by their acts, which they tend to view very critically. They would like you to accept their assertions on faith, but they demand proof for yours. They tend to engage in special pleading on behalf of themselves or their interests, usually because of some alleged special status, past circumstances, or present disadvantage. /SNIP This guy wrote a book about you... |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: On Apr 17, 1:12 pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:01:45 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote: No word yet on when they will start to be open and keep any of the promises they made related to their own administration... Well, of the 500 campaign promises Obama made, PolitiFact.com has him breaking only six promises, and keeping 5 pages worth. Not bad, IMO considering he's only been in office 3 months. http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/browse/ Well, I don't know how they are rating it, or how they are trimming the info to make it look good, but the important promises such as "reaching over party lines, bills having 5 days for study, openness about admin officials and the waivers, no lobbiests in the admin.. the list goes on, are being ignored... "The important promises..." According to who? You? An uneducated dum****? Oh, a lefty elitist. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
wrote: On Apr 17, 1:12 pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:01:45 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote: No word yet on when they will start to be open and keep any of the promises they made related to their own administration... Well, of the 500 campaign promises Obama made, PolitiFact.com has him breaking only six promises, and keeping 5 pages worth. Not bad, IMO considering he's only been in office 3 months. http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/browse/ Well, I don't know how they are rating it, or how they are trimming the info to make it look good, but the important promises such as "reaching over party lines, bills having 5 days for study, openness about admin officials and the waivers, no lobbiests in the admin.. the list goes on, are being ignored... "The important promises..." According to who? You? An uneducated dum****? Now there's important promises and unimportant promises. You really are a trip. Sheesh! |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't been here in a long time, but I see Ole Harry still has a way
with words. ================================== According to who? You? An uneducated dum****? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Difference between c map nt and c map nt+? | Cruising | |||
What's the difference? | ASA | |||
The Difference... | ASA | |||
What's the difference . . . | ASA | |||
difference between PDA and PPC ? | Electronics |