Doug Kanter wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...


If you were tied to a chair under a hot light and tortured for maybe a
hour
or so, the truth would come out: Your only problem with the weapons
inspectors is that many were not Americans. What a crock.


What? What are you smoking now? That really came out of "left" field.
Other than your own biased perceptions and wild speculative tendancies,
what would give you the idea that I have a prejudice against
non-american inspectors?

You just don't like it when your own logic is thrown back at you.

Dave



In the past, you and others have made derisive comments about the
inspectors. This is different than criticising the process itself.

When have I said anything negative about the inspectors themselves? I
would challenge you to find any post of mine which states such. I had a
problem with the whole process, and I believe that it was largely
ineffective because they were not given carte blanche approval to
inspect any place, anytime, and at their whim. They were still
restricted by the Iraqi government. I've read stories of inspectors
coming in the front door of a facility, while Iraqi's were quite
literally running out of the back door, carrying files and equipment.
When you are given a day's notice, you can clean up quite a few things.

But you're way out of line to suggest that I have some sort of
xenophobic rationale for not appoving of the inspection process.

Dave

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...


If you were tied to a chair under a hot light and tortured for maybe
a
hour
or so, the truth would come out: Your only problem with the weapons
inspectors is that many were not Americans. What a crock.


What? What are you smoking now? That really came out of "left" field.
Other than your own biased perceptions and wild speculative
tendancies,
what would give you the idea that I have a prejudice against
non-american inspectors?

You just don't like it when your own logic is thrown back at you.

Dave



In the past, you and others have made derisive comments about the
inspectors. This is different than criticising the process itself.

When have I said anything negative about the inspectors themselves? I
would challenge you to find any post of mine which states such. I had a
problem with the whole process, and I believe that it was largely
ineffective because they were not given carte blanche approval to
inspect any place, anytime, and at their whim. They were still
restricted by the Iraqi government. I've read stories of inspectors
coming in the front door of a facility, while Iraqi's were quite
literally running out of the back door, carrying files and equipment.
When you are given a day's notice, you can clean up quite a few things.

But you're way out of line to suggest that I have some sort of
xenophobic rationale for not appoving of the inspection process.

Dave

Fortunately the current inspectors are not hampered by these little
problems. That is why they are not finding *so* much more stuff!

Mark Browne

Mark Browne wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...


If you were tied to a chair under a hot light and tortured for maybe
a
hour
or so, the truth would come out: Your only problem with the weapons
inspectors is that many were not Americans. What a crock.


What? What are you smoking now? That really came out of "left" field.
Other than your own biased perceptions and wild speculative
tendancies,
what would give you the idea that I have a prejudice against
non-american inspectors?

You just don't like it when your own logic is thrown back at you.

Dave



In the past, you and others have made derisive comments about the
inspectors. This is different than criticising the process itself.

When have I said anything negative about the inspectors themselves? I
would challenge you to find any post of mine which states such. I had a
problem with the whole process, and I believe that it was largely
ineffective because they were not given carte blanche approval to
inspect any place, anytime, and at their whim. They were still
restricted by the Iraqi government. I've read stories of inspectors
coming in the front door of a facility, while Iraqi's were quite
literally running out of the back door, carrying files and equipment.
When you are given a day's notice, you can clean up quite a few things.

But you're way out of line to suggest that I have some sort of
xenophobic rationale for not appoving of the inspection process.

Dave

Fortunately the current inspectors are not hampered by these little
problems.

No, they have that nagging little problem of watching out for their
lives. It's also a bit more difficult to find things when many buildings
are now little more than piles of rubble.

I'm not sure just how much weapons inspection is going on these days.
It's certainly not a top focal point for the mainstream media. Just
trying to restore order, provide aid to the people, and rebuilding the
infrastructure, seems to be taking up the lion's share of our time and
effort.


Dave

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...

Just trying to restore order, provide aid to the people, and rebuilding
the
infrastructure, seems to be taking up the lion's share of our time and
effort.

Yeah....particularly since at least TWO aid organizations have left the
country completely because we cannot provide security for their people. What
a plan.

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...

I'm not sure just how much weapons inspection is going on these days.
It's certainly not a top focal point for the mainstream media. Just
trying to restore order, provide aid to the people, and rebuilding the
infrastructure, seems to be taking up the lion's share of our time and
effort.

Last time I heard anything, there were *hundreds* of inspectors rooting
around Iraq looking for weapons. Not only aren't there any remaining,
there's no information being uncovered that suggests they were moved
elsewhere.

Iraq, we didn't go there for the oil, but we're sure not leaving without it.

Dave Hall wrote:
Mark Browne wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...


If you were tied to a chair under a hot light and tortured for maybe
a
hour
or so, the truth would come out: Your only problem with the weapons
inspectors is that many were not Americans. What a crock.


What? What are you smoking now? That really came out of "left" field.
Other than your own biased perceptions and wild speculative
tendancies,
what would give you the idea that I have a prejudice against
non-american inspectors?

You just don't like it when your own logic is thrown back at you.

Dave



In the past, you and others have made derisive comments about the
inspectors. This is different than criticising the process itself.

When have I said anything negative about the inspectors themselves? I
would challenge you to find any post of mine which states such. I had a
problem with the whole process, and I believe that it was largely
ineffective because they were not given carte blanche approval to
inspect any place, anytime, and at their whim. They were still
restricted by the Iraqi government. I've read stories of inspectors
coming in the front door of a facility, while Iraqi's were quite
literally running out of the back door, carrying files and equipment.
When you are given a day's notice, you can clean up quite a few things.

But you're way out of line to suggest that I have some sort of
xenophobic rationale for not appoving of the inspection process.

Dave

Fortunately the current inspectors are not hampered by these little
problems.

No, they have that nagging little problem of watching out for their
lives. It's also a bit more difficult to find things when many buildings
are now little more than piles of rubble.

I'm not sure just how much weapons inspection is going on these days.
It's certainly not a top focal point for the mainstream media. Just
trying to restore order, provide aid to the people, and rebuilding the
infrastructure, seems to be taking up the lion's share of our time and
effort.


Dave



Well, Dave...it probably is getting close to the time when you and all
the other Republican asskissers are the only ones left who believe the
lies and deceptions of the Smirking Chimp and his pack of rationalizers.

Just think...we had a President who lied about blow jobs and now we have
a president who lies about everything.

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

"jps" wrote in message
...
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...

I'm not sure just how much weapons inspection is going on these days.
It's certainly not a top focal point for the mainstream media. Just
trying to restore order, provide aid to the people, and rebuilding the
infrastructure, seems to be taking up the lion's share of our time and
effort.

Last time I heard anything, there were *hundreds* of inspectors rooting
around Iraq looking for weapons. Not only aren't there any remaining,
there's no information being uncovered that suggests they were moved
elsewhere.

Iraq, we didn't go there for the oil, but we're sure not leaving without
it.


Don't worry too much about Dave believing that there are no WMDs in Iraq
anymore. Now that little Bush and his merry band are all singing some new
tunes, Dave will finally be able to accept what we have been saying all
along. We can call this a closed issued and work on to setting him straight
on the next administration "facts."

Will Dave ever admit that we were right all along?
I would not count on it.

No WNDs, No nukes, no Iraq-Al Qa'eda ties - an abrupt 180 degree turn from
several members of the administration in unison. I will give little Bush
high marks for marshaling what version of the truth his staff spouts. As far
as I can see, it is the only thing he seems to be able to do well.

Mark Browne
PS - We told you so!

"Mark Browne" wrote in message
et...

I will give little Bush
high marks for marshaling what version of the truth his staff spouts. As
far
as I can see, it is the only thing he seems to be able to do well.

That's got to be Karl Rove's work. Targeted, coordinated communications are
his strong suit. It's what makes this administration so convincing, whether
they're telling the truth or not.

"Mark Browne" wrote in message . net...
"jps" wrote in message
...
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...

I'm not sure just how much weapons inspection is going on these days.
It's certainly not a top focal point for the mainstream media. Just
trying to restore order, provide aid to the people, and rebuilding the
infrastructure, seems to be taking up the lion's share of our time and
effort.

Last time I heard anything, there were *hundreds* of inspectors rooting
around Iraq looking for weapons. Not only aren't there any remaining,
there's no information being uncovered that suggests they were moved
elsewhere.

Iraq, we didn't go there for the oil, but we're sure not leaving without
it.


Don't worry too much about Dave believing that there are no WMDs in Iraq
anymore. Now that little Bush and his merry band are all singing some new
tunes, Dave will finally be able to accept what we have been saying all
along. We can call this a closed issued and work on to setting him straight
on the next administration "facts."

Will Dave ever admit that we were right all along?
I would not count on it.

No WNDs, No nukes, no Iraq-Al Qa'eda ties - an abrupt 180 degree turn from
several members of the administration in unison. I will give little Bush
high marks for marshaling what version of the truth his staff spouts. As far
as I can see, it is the only thing he seems to be able to do well.

Mark Browne
PS - We told you so!

Christ almighty, five grown men all sitting around pulling each others
dicks and trying to see who can come up with the best line... Why
don't you five take it off list and give the NG back to the boaters?

This is better than TV, watching all these idiots high 5 each other after
insulting their opponents. The best one is jps, making predictions on who
is going to win the election. No intelligent person would begin to make a
prediction concerning a Nov. 2004 race, so it does begin to show the caliber
of people we are dealing with.


"Backyard Renegade" wrote in message
om...
"Mark Browne" wrote in message
. net...
"jps" wrote in message
...
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...

I'm not sure just how much weapons inspection is going on these
days.
It's certainly not a top focal point for the mainstream media. Just
trying to restore order, provide aid to the people, and rebuilding
the
infrastructure, seems to be taking up the lion's share of our time
and
effort.

Last time I heard anything, there were *hundreds* of inspectors
rooting
around Iraq looking for weapons. Not only aren't there any remaining,
there's no information being uncovered that suggests they were moved
elsewhere.

Iraq, we didn't go there for the oil, but we're sure not leaving
without
it.


Don't worry too much about Dave believing that there are no WMDs in Iraq
anymore. Now that little Bush and his merry band are all singing some
new
tunes, Dave will finally be able to accept what we have been saying all
along. We can call this a closed issued and work on to setting him
straight
on the next administration "facts."

Will Dave ever admit that we were right all along?
I would not count on it.

No WNDs, No nukes, no Iraq-Al Qa'eda ties - an abrupt 180 degree turn
from
several members of the administration in unison. I will give little Bush
high marks for marshaling what version of the truth his staff spouts. As
far
as I can see, it is the only thing he seems to be able to do well.

Mark Browne
PS - We told you so!

Christ almighty, five grown men all sitting around pulling each others
dicks and trying to see who can come up with the best line... Why
don't you five take it off list and give the NG back to the boaters?