"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Apr 11, 5:41 pm, "Canuck57" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message

...



"Canuck57" wrote in message
...

We need to get tougher to deal with this. Should have just been a nuke,
one each for Iraq and Afganistan. Over in 30 minutes.

Does Canada have nukes?

Serious question. I don't know the answer.

Not officially. But officially we have uranium, mines and partial
refinement capabilities to make them

If we have them, they would be US made and supplied. Some rumours fly
around here and there. My guess is they could be moved from the Dakota's
to
Cold Lake in no time.... if they already are not there.

The question is what is a desireable outcome here.

If you say freeing the hostages.......WRONG. A desireable outcome is
to minimize future occurences. This may be entirely different from
saving the hostages and not recognizing this fact will result in many
more deaths. Obama is not capable of understanding this. Paying
ransom is morally wrong because it results in more hostages being
taken. Thus, the actiuons of the rest of the world to this point have
been both morally and logically wrong and have brought us to this
point.
-----------
Take a page from Isreal, nice to get hostages back but making damn sure they
can't do it again, and again is paramount to success.

Kill them dead while in the act.

Now we are going to start the Obama $1M at a time multi-billion doolar fund
for Somalia bailout plan? What a joke. I hope the president wasn't really
serious of reducing the demands to $1M dollars? Was this for real? If so,
USA has a real problem, and it is at home. OMG, I can't believe that.