Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
American crew retakes ship
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:12:18 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: I would put a noose around all the pirates that are captured on the ship and line them up along the rail. Inform the ones with the captain that if anything happens to the captain or they leave the area, the ones on the rail will head to the sea. I was watching Glenn Beck a while ago and for once he said something that might have made sense. "Where are the Marines?" Keeping a fast reaction force in that area and just plain kicking ass when an American flagged ship is touched would stop it cold. The Marines are not trained to handle this type of operation. The Navy SEALs are better trained and equipped to respond to these situations. Marine small units are platoons, 40 men, SEAL small units are 8 to 10 men. The logistics of the SEAL team make them much easier to deploy and manage in the field. Take no prisoners. I agree, turn the pirates into shark food. I got a feeling it won't be done because of crew safety and "environmental" considerations. The sharks would spit out the pirates? Sticky problem. The Mayaguez and Iran hostage situations are probably studied to make these kinds of decision Remember the Q-ships? Merchant ships with hidden guns. Maybe it was all a John Wayne movie. Tripoli was assaulted to stop the pirates before. That took resolve and a back bone to make a decision. Might take a land assault to stop it this time. Tripoli was a land assault. It's weird to think that 204 years after the Barbary pirates, we're back to the same problem. Piracy and terrorism will never go away. Actually, Somalia is less "civilized" than was Tripoli. Somalia is giant leap back to the 7th century. There was a leader of Tripoli to make peace with. There was leader to threaten with death. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
American crew retakes ship
Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons to
defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with quad 50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient to strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates. "Eisboch" wrote in message ... Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
American crew retakes ship
wrote in message m... Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons to defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with quad 50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient to strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates. "Eisboch" wrote in message ... Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy I have searched around and haven't found a specific reference yet, but I think there may be an international maritime law regarding the arming of merchant vessels. Sidearms are ok, I think, but not a major weapons system. I've found general references, but not anything that clearly addresses the subject. Eisboch |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
American crew retakes ship
On Apr 9, 12:23*am, wrote:
Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons to defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with quad 50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient to strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates."Eisboch" wrote in message ... Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Agreed. At least a couple Ma-deuces, and even mini-guns would help |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
American crew retakes ship
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Apr 9, 12:23*am, wrote: Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons to defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with quad 50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient to strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates."Eisboch" wrote in message ... Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Agreed. At least a couple Ma-deuces, and even mini-guns would help Arm that 13 man crew. The ones who have a half mile of railings to watch for ladders and grappling irons.[Emma Maersk] It is true that there are many smaller ships, with bigger crews. It cost about 2 to 3 million bucks for a stabilized 20mm mount. That leaves spray and pray, and the Gatling doesn't need to be bigger than 5,56mm. No armor on those outboard motors. Shoot if you see guns and ladders. Casady |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
American crew retakes ship
Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Apr 9, 12:23 am, wrote: Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons to defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with quad 50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient to strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates."Eisboch" wrote in message ... Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Agreed. At least a couple Ma-deuces, and even mini-guns would help Arm that 13 man crew. The ones who have a half mile of railings to watch for ladders and grappling irons.[Emma Maersk] It is true that there are many smaller ships, with bigger crews. It cost about 2 to 3 million bucks for a stabilized 20mm mount. That leaves spray and pray, and the Gatling doesn't need to be bigger than 5,56mm. No armor on those outboard motors. Shoot if you see guns and ladders. Casady Alternately, we could give our mighty military forces and the mighty military forces of other interested countries something useful to do for a change. A few carriers and protective ships in the area, helped by satellites and flyovers from carrier jets and prop planes, would do it. We can easily keep track of the merchant vessels, and we can in real time keep track of suspicious activities by the dinky boats and ships the pirates operate. -- Palin & Bachmann in 2012 - All Stupidity All the Time |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
American crew retakes ship
On Apr 10, 9:42*am, HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Apr 9, 12:23 am, wrote: Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons to defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with quad 50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient to strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates."Eisboch" wrote in message news:Cb6dnZsqAv2bQEHUnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@giganews. com... Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Agreed. At least a couple Ma-deuces, and even mini-guns would help Arm that 13 man crew. The ones who have a half mile of railings to watch for ladders and grappling irons.[Emma Maersk] It is true that there are many smaller ships, with bigger crews. It cost about 2 to 3 million bucks for a stabilized 20mm mount. That leaves spray and pray, and the Gatling doesn't need to be bigger than 5,56mm. No armor on those outboard motors. Shoot if you see guns and ladders. Casady Alternately, we could give our mighty military forces and the mighty military forces of other interested countries something useful to do for a change. A few carriers and protective ships in the area, helped by satellites and flyovers from carrier jets and prop planes, would do it. We can easily keep track of the merchant vessels, and we can in real time keep track of suspicious activities by the dinky boats and ships the pirates operate. -- Palin & Bachmann in 2012 - Bring Integerity back to Washington. Pffftt. Hopefully, nobody here is litening to you as your assumption is way off. According to Navy officials it would take 60 ships to handle that area. Do you know how many ships we currently have in our Navy? C'mon Harry, get some facts then come back and talk snerk Here's a hint, think 300... |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
American crew retakes ship
"HK" wrote in message ... Alternately, we could give our mighty military forces and the mighty military forces of other interested countries something useful to do for a change. A few carriers and protective ships in the area, helped by satellites and flyovers from carrier jets and prop planes, would do it. We can easily keep track of the merchant vessels, and we can in real time keep track of suspicious activities by the dinky boats and ships the pirates operate. Not enough ships for too big of an ocean. Fast as they may be, they couldn't respond to a boarding 200 miles away in time to prevent it, even at 30-35 kts. Maybe they all need to be retrofitted with a bank of Etecs on their transoms to get there faster. Eisboch Eisboch |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
American crew retakes ship
"Richard Casady" wrote in message ... On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Apr 9, 12:23 am, wrote: Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons to defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with quad 50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient to strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates."Eisboch" wrote in message ... Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Agreed. At least a couple Ma-deuces, and even mini-guns would help Arm that 13 man crew. The ones who have a half mile of railings to watch for ladders and grappling irons.[Emma Maersk] It is true that there are many smaller ships, with bigger crews. It cost about 2 to 3 million bucks for a stabilized 20mm mount. That leaves spray and pray, and the Gatling doesn't need to be bigger than 5,56mm. No armor on those outboard motors. Shoot if you see guns and ladders. Casady I read last night that there a two major reasons why merchant ships are not legally armed with much more than side arms. The first is that they often carry cargo like oil or other flammables, the vapors of which can be explosive. The second is that many ports will not allow an armed civilian ship to enter. Eisboch |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
American crew retakes ship
Eisboch wrote:
"Richard Casady" wrote in message ... On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Apr 9, 12:23 am, wrote: Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons to defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with quad 50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient to strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates."Eisboch" wrote in message ... Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Agreed. At least a couple Ma-deuces, and even mini-guns would help Arm that 13 man crew. The ones who have a half mile of railings to watch for ladders and grappling irons.[Emma Maersk] It is true that there are many smaller ships, with bigger crews. It cost about 2 to 3 million bucks for a stabilized 20mm mount. That leaves spray and pray, and the Gatling doesn't need to be bigger than 5,56mm. No armor on those outboard motors. Shoot if you see guns and ladders. Casady I read last night that there a two major reasons why merchant ships are not legally armed with much more than side arms. The first is that they often carry cargo like oil or other flammables, the vapors of which can be explosive. The second is that many ports will not allow an armed civilian ship to enter. Eisboch Both of which make sense, and I've read in several places that armed civilian ships are indeed not allowed in many ports. It's the job of governments to keep the sea lanes safe. There are plenty of small offshore patrol boats available in the free world. Our U.S. Navy could be buying some of these from friendly nations if we don't have enough, or we could build a few dozen for a fraction of the cost of another useless and vulnerable aircraft carrier. -- Palin & Bachmann in 2012 - All Stupidity All the Time |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Brig Fair American - semi-assembled wooden sailing ship model - Model Shipways Kit [EBay] | Tall Ships | |||
SHIP REFITTING CREW REQUIRED | Crew | |||
crew places at tall ship cruise around Corsica next week | Tall Ships | |||
ship of the line gun desigantions and crew | Tall Ships | |||
Canadian Navy Sinks American Ship | ASA |