Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H
Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.
Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H

Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.

What country would you have had him 'punish'?
15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country,
to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their
government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the
Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged
by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans.
Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's.

In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda
operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged
(or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's
borders.

Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country
go free.....

Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will
be
funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR
SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies",
who
provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers.

"The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers
discovered
in
September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near
Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent
cell
believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign
fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of
biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more
than
700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006."

I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence
have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted
felons.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl
Harbor.

Enuff. Bye.


It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic", if
you can call it logic.



Why are you always such an asshole, Doug?

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

"D K" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in
no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H
Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already
concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in
office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.
Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney
Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H

Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking
us.

What country would you have had him 'punish'?
15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country,
to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their
government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to
the
Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely
unchallenged
by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans.
Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's.

In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda
operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged
(or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's
borders.

Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this
country
go free.....

Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That
will
be
funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR
SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies",
who
provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our
soldiers.

"The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers
discovered
in
September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near
Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an
insurgent
cell
believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign
fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection
of
biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for
more
than
700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006."

I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from
whence
have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted
felons.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for
Pearl
Harbor.

Enuff. Bye.


It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic", if
you can call it logic.

Why are you always such an asshole, Doug?


I asked John to name the country which attacked us on 9/11. If that's being
an asshole, then I'm an asshole. Live with it.

My impression at this point of the discussion is that John's refusal to name
the enemy fits the constitutional term "adhering to the enemy" (see Article
III section 3, definition of treason). What do you think?

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 21:15:16 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:03:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
news:9crpl49k4608ilg3qus7rtgtr7duhm7eo2@4ax .com...
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@ 4ax.com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in
no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already
concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in
office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney
Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking
us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country,
to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their
government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to
the
Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely
unchallenged
by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans.
Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's.

In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda
operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged
(or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's
borders.

Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this
country
go free.....


Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That
will
be
funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR
SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies",
who
provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our
soldiers.

"The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers
discovered
in
September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near
Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent
cell
believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign
fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of
biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more
than
700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006."


I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from
whence
have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted
felons.
--
** Good Day! **

John H


Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl
Harbor.


Enuff. Bye.


It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic", if
you can call it logic.


Doug. I've presented nothing. I've asked a question. You've still not
answered it.


It's been long enough since 9/11 for you to know who really attacked us. You
really can't answer the question, can you? You don't know who attacked us.

Suggestion: Move your TV set to the attic for a year. Football is rotting
your brain, old soldier.


Doug, have you ever noticed that many liberals, when asked a question,
willl ignore the question, quickly change the subject, or begin with
personal insults, rather than simply answer the question?

Here, oh brave man, "What country would you have had him 'punish'?"

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 22:38:27 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"D K" wrote in message
m...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in
no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H
Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already
concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in
office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.
Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney
Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H

Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking
us.

What country would you have had him 'punish'?
15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country,
to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their
government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to
the
Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely
unchallenged
by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans.
Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's.

In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda
operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged
(or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's
borders.

Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this
country
go free.....

Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That
will
be
funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR
SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies",
who
provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our
soldiers.

"The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers
discovered
in
September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near
Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an
insurgent
cell
believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign
fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection
of
biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for
more
than
700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006."

I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from
whence
have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted
felons.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for
Pearl
Harbor.

Enuff. Bye.


It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic", if
you can call it logic.

Why are you always such an asshole, Doug?


I asked John to name the country which attacked us on 9/11. If that's being
an asshole, then I'm an asshole. Live with it.

My impression at this point of the discussion is that John's refusal to name
the enemy fits the constitutional term "adhering to the enemy" (see Article
III section 3, definition of treason). What do you think?


No.

You said, "Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for
attacking us."

I said, "What country would you have had him 'punish'?"

At least try to keep your story straight. You're beginning to sound like
Harry.

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

D K wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed
in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H
Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already
concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in
office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.
Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney
Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H

Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for
attacking us.

What country would you have had him 'punish'?
15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country,
to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their
government owned radio. That same government, having close ties
to the
Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely
unchallenged
by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans.
Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's.

In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda
operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged
(or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's
borders.

Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this
country
go free.....

Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information.
That will
be
funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR
SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called
"allies", who
provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our
soldiers.

"The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers
discovered
in
September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near
Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an
insurgent
cell
believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign
fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a
collection of
biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for
more
than
700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006."

I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from
whence
have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted
felons.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for
Pearl
Harbor.

Enuff. Bye.


It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic",
if you can call it logic.


Why are you always such an asshole, Doug?

You should know better.

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

==================


I think Obama makes his doubters nervous and perhaps defensive because he
can speak English. He can correctly assemble plural and singular verbs &
nouns, something Bush had difficulty with. This makes Obama an elitist in
the eyes of his doubters, although these are the same people who also like
to complain about the "failed education system". When the "system" succeeds,
it produces elitists. The "system" just can't win. :-)

The only time Obama sounds polished is when he is reading the words from
a tele-prompter. Otherwise, he and Caroline Kennedy sound like a couple
of 12 year old girls in a junior high school hallway.

To understand this twisted way of thinking, you have to be from a certain
part of the country:

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...g?t=1230822728

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H
Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.
Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.

Which country was responsible for attacking us? Name the country or
countries?

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H
Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.
Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H

Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.

What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H

The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.

You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H

With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information
by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be
best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely
nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.

Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'?

Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff.

John H


There are two possibilities at the moment:

1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't
play that game.

2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above,
"people who do not read".

There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country. If
you don't know the name, we're all done here.



You brought it up Doug, you name the country.

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

"BAR" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

==================


I think Obama makes his doubters nervous and perhaps defensive because he
can speak English. He can correctly assemble plural and singular verbs &
nouns, something Bush had difficulty with. This makes Obama an elitist in
the eyes of his doubters, although these are the same people who also
like to complain about the "failed education system". When the "system"
succeeds, it produces elitists. The "system" just can't win. :-)

The only time Obama sounds polished is when he is reading the words from a
tele-prompter. Otherwise, he and Caroline Kennedy sound like a couple of
12 year old girls in a junior high school hallway.


Considering who you voted for in two previous elections, you are not very
well qualified to make that determination.

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 21:15:16 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:03:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:5leql41nfqmlh62bup84k14farj4ggdhf9@4ax. com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Gene Kearns" wrote in
message
news:9crpl49k4608ilg3qus7rtgtr7duhm7eo2@4a x.com...
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following
well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4 @4ax.com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed
in
no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already
concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in
office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be
a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq
and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney
Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking
us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That
country,
to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their
government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to
the
Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely
unchallenged
by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000
Americans.
Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's.

In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda
operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been
charged
(or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that
country's
borders.

Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this
country
go free.....


Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That
will
be
funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR
SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called
"allies",
who
provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our
soldiers.

"The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers
discovered
in
September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert
near
Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an
insurgent
cell
believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of
foreign
fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection
of
biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for
more
than
700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006."


I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from
whence
have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted
felons.
--
** Good Day! **

John H


Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for
Pearl
Harbor.


Enuff. Bye.


It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic",
if
you can call it logic.


Doug. I've presented nothing. I've asked a question. You've still not
answered it.


It's been long enough since 9/11 for you to know who really attacked us.
You
really can't answer the question, can you? You don't know who attacked us.

Suggestion: Move your TV set to the attic for a year. Football is rotting
your brain, old soldier.


Doug, have you ever noticed that many liberals, when asked a question,
willl ignore the question, quickly change the subject, or begin with
personal insults, rather than simply answer the question?

Here, oh brave man, "What country would you have had him 'punish'?"

My goal at this point in the discussion is to find out if you can name the
country which attacked us on 9/11. You may be avoiding the answer because
you believe the attackers did not officially represent the country from
which most of them originated. That's just an opinion which I do not share.

So, let's keep it simple: Where did most of the attackers come from? "New
Jersey", "Germany" or "Florida" are not permissible answers.