|
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
wrote in message
... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"BAR" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... Boater wrote: Don White wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have more than one or two kids. Why don't you start preaching that to Africa, Middle East and Asia. Does that mean we shouldn't improve certain practices until everyone else does? Yes. If it is good for us it is good for everyone. So, you think we should freeze technology until Africa catches up with the program. That's nonsense, of course, but you're not here to say things which make sense. Try again tomorrow if and when you're sober. You are the one proposing that we freeze technology to wait for the rest of the world to catch up to us. If limiting children to one per couple is good for the developed world why isn't it good for the undeveloped world? If limiting CO2 emissions in the developed world is good then why not limit CO2 emissions in the undeveloped world? Uh...no. Above, I asked you this: "Does that mean we shouldn't improve certain practices until everyone else does?" Your response was: "Yes." Therefore, YOU are suggesting that we improve nothing until Africa catches up with us. Since Africa will probably NEVER catch up with us, your answer is absurd. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
... On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
... Boater wrote: Don White wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have more than one or two kids. Maybe we should make abortion mandatory for anyone who has more than 2 kids? Heck, we have too many people already, we should make having more than one kid illegal, with the death penalty as punishment. Why? Most of us already do things differently than we did 40 years ago, just because it's a good idea. What's with the kneejerk reaction about making something into a law? |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Jan 1, 12:41*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight answer... pfffftttt... |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
wrote in message
... On Jan 1, 12:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight answer... pfffftttt... =============== Why do you suppose John either: 1) Doesn't know the name of the country or 2) Is afraid or unwilling to reveal his answer |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Jan 1, 12:52*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 12:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight answer... pfffftttt... =============== Why do you suppose John either: 1) Doesn't know the name of the country or 2) Is afraid or unwilling to reveal his answer- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Probably like me remembers how much of an idiot you are and doesn't want to play your schoolboy games.... Not to mention, sometimes your drunken logic is hard to follow.. bye bye.. plonk... |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
wrote in message
... On Jan 1, 12:52 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 12:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight answer... pfffftttt... =============== Why do you suppose John either: 1) Doesn't know the name of the country or 2) Is afraid or unwilling to reveal his answer- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Probably like me remembers how much of an idiot you are and doesn't want to play your schoolboy games.... Not to mention, sometimes your drunken logic is hard to follow.. bye bye.. plonk... =========== Oh no. I've been plonked. There goes my day. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 12:52 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 12:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight answer... pfffftttt... =============== Why do you suppose John either: 1) Doesn't know the name of the country or 2) Is afraid or unwilling to reveal his answer- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Probably like me remembers how much of an idiot you are and doesn't want to play your schoolboy games.... Not to mention, sometimes your drunken logic is hard to follow.. bye bye.. plonk... =========== Oh no. I've been plonked. There goes my day. Justwait has the intellectual capabilities of a slug. In case you did not know. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:41:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H Clue: The country in question is in the Middle East. Why can't you just say "I don't know the answer?" Or: "I'm playing a game and I want to see YOU type the name of the country." Doug, you started the game playing. You made a comment, I asked a question. You refuse to answer. End of game. I don't play your silly games. -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com