Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

wrote:
On Dec 31 2008, 3:52 pm, Boater wrote:
Don White wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
There's just way too many people in the world today.
We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few
generations or we'll all be over run.
I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have
more than one or two kids.

Or cats or dogs. Animal shelters are over run by cats and dogs that
are unwanted.

Really.. Up here we are getting very disturbing commercials from the
ASPCA which leave my kid in tears. She knows it is bull too as ASPCA is
about as good at saving animals as "Planned Parenthood" is at saving
babies..

Please folks, if you are going to help animals, support your local shelter..

Off my soap box... Happy new year.
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.


Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'?

Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4ax. com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information
by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be
best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely
nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.


Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'?

Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff.

John H


There are two possibilities at the moment:

1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't
play that game.

2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above,
"people who do not read".

There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country. If
you don't know the name, we're all done here.

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:25:06 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:msppl49men4h7me41cpjvuid9dpcgol8v6@4ax. com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4a x.com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in
no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already
concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in
office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking
us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been
told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not
read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in
news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information
by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be
best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I
might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely
nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.


Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'?

Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff.

John H


There are two possibilities at the moment:

1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't
play that game.

2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above,
"people who do not read".

There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country.
If
you don't know the name, we're all done here.


If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess
we're done.

John H


How is it possible that you don't know where most of the 9/11 attackers came
from?

How is it possible that you don't know which country sent more foreign
fighters than any other into Iraq to kill our soldiers?

How is it possible that you don't know which country has repeatedly resisted
our efforts to get its ruling family to stop funding schools which train
lunatics to attack us?

How is it possible that you don't know which country's ruling family has
contributed to every presidential library in recent memory, in return for
special treatment?

Seriously. How? Have you been sleeping for the past 8 years?

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:25:06 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4ax .com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information
by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be
best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely
nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.


Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'?

Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff.

John H


There are two possibilities at the moment:

1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't
play that game.

2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above,
"people who do not read".

There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country. If
you don't know the name, we're all done here.


If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess
we're done.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:


How is it possible that you don't know where most of the 9/11 attackers
came from?

New Jersey, or at least that's what their driver's license said. Besides
all the other troubles they wrought, getting a license in this state has
now become a real PITA.

Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
Boater wrote:
Don White wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
There's just way too many people in the world today.
We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few
generations or we'll all be over run.

I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have
more than one or two kids.
Why don't you start preaching that to Africa, Middle East and Asia.


Does that mean we shouldn't improve certain practices until everyone else
does?
Yes. If it is good for us it is good for everyone.


So, you think we should freeze technology until Africa catches up with the
program. That's nonsense, of course, but you're not here to say things
which make sense.

Try again tomorrow if and when you're sober.

You are the one proposing that we freeze technology to wait for the rest
of the world to catch up to us. If limiting children to one per couple
is good for the developed world why isn't it good for the undeveloped
world? If limiting CO2 emissions in the developed world is good then why
not limit CO2 emissions in the undeveloped world?