|
Micro-four thirds...
On Dec 17, 4:00*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Dec 17, 2:05 pm, "Don White" wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... wrote: On Dec 17, 12:20 pm, Jim wrote: SmallBoats.com wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? *See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. *Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. *The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. *Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. *The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. *Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard...;) ----------------- http://www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com-*C...tention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails, fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention he is barely able to shoot over the railing on the balcony.. Unless the fence is 6 feet tall, he is not only fat, but short too. Tell you what...you come on down here with a pile of money in your pocket. I will give you $5000 cash for every inch I am shorter than 5'11" and you will give me $5000 for every inch I am taller than 5'11". Bring $10000 to $15000. Put up or shut up, short****. Hee hee..watch them weasel out of this bet.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, but you convieniently left out my part of the bet... I saw his suggestion and called, the ball is in his court... Sorry...your part of the bet was not part of the bet. Remember? You keep saying I am short, and I offered to let you find out how wrong you were, but for a price. I never challenged your motorcycle riding abilities or disabilities.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But you said I was short and weak. I just want to cover all the bases in one shot.. I knew you didn't have it in you... |
Micro-four thirds...
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:51:21 -0500, Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Sorry...your part of the bet was not part of the bet. Remember? You keep saying I am short, and I offered to let you find out how wrong you were, but for a price. This guy would have considered you short. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pershing_Wadlow Eisboch Absolutely, but thank goodness, I'm not 5'7" with a temper to match. I thought you were pretty short, Harry, and pudgy. -- John Salmonbait |
Micro-four thirds...
wrote in message ... On Dec 17, 3:17 pm, John wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:17:02 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 17, 12:44 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: On Dec 17, 12:20 pm, Jim wrote: SmallBoats.com wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard...;) ----------------- http://www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com-*C...tention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails, fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention he is barely able to shoot over the railing on the balcony.. Unless the fence is 6 feet tall, he is not only fat, but short too. Tell you what...you come on down here with a pile of money in your pocket. I will give you $5000 cash for every inch I am shorter than 5'11" and you will give me $5000 for every inch I am taller than 5'11". Bring $10000 to $15000. Put up or shut up, short****.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Tell you what, what if we make it??? Since you also said I was weak you come up here with a fistfull of money and I will give you $5000 for every lap more you can do than me on the Motocross track here [http://www.ctmotocross.com/Photos/07layout4.jpg] and you give me the same for every lap more I can do than you? I have access to almost any configuration of MX ride you want. The Mouse would like to take the same bet. She is14 yo, 5'3", and 110 lbs.. Warning, she is known to ride for several hours straight at about 4.5 minutes per lap;) I can't ride as long as her, but I am sure I could cover enough laps for a couple years at a pretty good school;) Put up or shut up;) When I met Harry, I thought he was short and pudgy. -- John Salmonbait- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'd LOVE to give Harry the chance to show me what a manly strong person he is! I have the strength, skill, and fortitude to kick the **** out of him in a minute. ************************************************** ** Liar |
Micro-four thirds...
"Boater" wrote in message ... John wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:51:21 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Sorry...your part of the bet was not part of the bet. Remember? You keep saying I am short, and I offered to let you find out how wrong you were, but for a price. This guy would have considered you short. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pershing_Wadlow Eisboch Absolutely, but thank goodness, I'm not 5'7" with a temper to match. I thought you were pretty short, Harry, and pudgy. -- John Salmonbait Yeah, well, you're an idiot. I'm about an inch shorter than you are, as you well know. We noticed you didn't address the "pudgy". Eisboch |
Micro-four thirds...
John wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:51:21 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Sorry...your part of the bet was not part of the bet. Remember? You keep saying I am short, and I offered to let you find out how wrong you were, but for a price. This guy would have considered you short. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pershing_Wadlow Eisboch Absolutely, but thank goodness, I'm not 5'7" with a temper to match. I thought you were pretty short, Harry, and pudgy. -- John Salmonbait Yeah, well, you're an idiot. I'm about an inch shorter than you are, as you well know. |
Micro-four thirds...
On Dec 17, 6:00*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... John wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:51:21 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Sorry...your part of the bet was not part of the bet. Remember? You keep saying I am short, and I offered to let you find out how wrong you were, but for a price. This guy would have considered you short. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pershing_Wadlow Eisboch Absolutely, but thank goodness, I'm not 5'7" with a temper to match. I thought you were pretty short, Harry, and pudgy. -- John Salmonbait Yeah, well, you're an idiot. I'm about an inch shorter than you are, as you well know. We noticed you didn't address the "pudgy". Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, Harry is not pudgy... He just plain fat! |
Micro-four thirds...
wrote in message ... Hey, Harry is not pudgy... He just plain fat! I don't think so. As one who got too "big", fought the battle to lose 65 lbs, and now am slowly creeping back up again, I don't call anyone "fat". I prefer "pleasingly plump". Or slightly pudgy. Eisboch |
Micro-four thirds...
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:00:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... John wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:51:21 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Sorry...your part of the bet was not part of the bet. Remember? You keep saying I am short, and I offered to let you find out how wrong you were, but for a price. This guy would have considered you short. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pershing_Wadlow Eisboch Absolutely, but thank goodness, I'm not 5'7" with a temper to match. I thought you were pretty short, Harry, and pudgy. -- John Salmonbait Yeah, well, you're an idiot. I'm about an inch shorter than you are, as you well know. We noticed you didn't address the "pudgy". Eisboch LOL! Did you try the Irfanview trick, or was I just wasting my breath? -- John Salmonbait |
Micro-four thirds...
"John" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:00:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... John wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:51:21 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Sorry...your part of the bet was not part of the bet. Remember? You keep saying I am short, and I offered to let you find out how wrong you were, but for a price. This guy would have considered you short. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pershing_Wadlow Eisboch Absolutely, but thank goodness, I'm not 5'7" with a temper to match. I thought you were pretty short, Harry, and pudgy. -- John Salmonbait Yeah, well, you're an idiot. I'm about an inch shorter than you are, as you well know. We noticed you didn't address the "pudgy". Eisboch LOL! Did you try the Irfanview trick, or was I just wasting my breath? -- John Salmonbait No. Actually, I didn't know what "Lview" was. BTW ... I finally installed the latest and greatest version of Infranview. It adds a few more capabilities in terms of file types it can deal with and has a few more features. It also includes an option for a desktop Google to search for stuff on your computer. I tried it but quickly disabled it. As soon as I tried it, I got all kinds of warnings from a spyware program I use that the desktop Google would allow people to access my computer from the Internet. Eisboch |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com