Micro-four thirds...
 

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store'
in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon
or Canon cameras.

That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.

Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?

Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR
cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even
come close in that market segment.

Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?

Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff?

How about it?

Micro-four thirds...
 

Don White wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:54:11 -0500, HK wrote:

Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
Well, I gone and dun it...

http://tinyurl.com/5wr2q3

Should be here on Friday.

Now I need to sell my 300 and 330 before Mrs. Wave finds out.

This could be a problem... :)
Those Olympic people won't be happy that you've deserted them.

Do you think the 4/3 system is a good compromise between full sized
SLRs and the tiny compact camera CMOS?
No. The original 4/3'rds didn't really catch on. There is no reason to
suspect the newly revised version will, either.
Where do you come up with this crap? Talk to fashion and outdoors
photographers sometime about what they use in reality - Canon or
Olympus E-1s and now E-3s.

Keep following the herd Harry - that's what you seem to be really good
at.

Moron.

Interesting. The fashion and outdoors photographers I know, and I hire
some every year, use Hasselblads, Nikons, and Canons. The architectual
photographers are using Hasselblads and 4x5's. I can't even recall the
last time I saw a working commercial photographer using an Olympus. Next
time you see a presidential "photo op," see if there are very many, if
any, Olympus cameras among the pros.

For a product like a professional SLR to "catch on," it has to have market
share. Among working photographers, what do you suppose the Olympus market
share is? No one out there is competing in a serious fashion with Nikon
and Canon.

I'm not knocking Olympus technology or quality. As I previously stated,
they make fine camera. When I state they haven't caught on, I mean market
share.

I see no reason to be iconoclastic when it comes to cameras. Nikons and
Canons are good enough for me.

When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store'
in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon
or Canon cameras.





Don...you might want to take a look at the Panasonic LX3, too.
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

Micro-four thirds...
 

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store'
in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon
or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?

Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR
cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even
come close in that market segment.

Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?

Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff?

How about it?


What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do
with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the
world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it
was you were trying to say there?

Micro-four thirds...
 

Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo
store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals
use either Nikon or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?

Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR
cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands
even come close in that market segment.

Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?

Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff?

How about it?


What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do
with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the
world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it
was you were trying to say there?

You are an armchair expert. Either get out of the chair and prove your
capabilities or STFU.

Micro-four thirds...
 

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"Boater" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:54:11 -0500, HK wrote:

Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
Well, I gone and dun it...

http://tinyurl.com/5wr2q3

Should be here on Friday.

Now I need to sell my 300 and 330 before Mrs. Wave finds out.

This could be a problem... :)
Those Olympic people won't be happy that you've deserted them.

Do you think the 4/3 system is a good compromise between full sized
SLRs and the tiny compact camera CMOS?
No. The original 4/3'rds didn't really catch on. There is no reason to
suspect the newly revised version will, either.

Where do you come up with this crap? Talk to fashion and outdoors
photographers sometime about what they use in reality - Canon or
Olympus E-1s and now E-3s.

Keep following the herd Harry - that's what you seem to be really good
at.

Moron.


Interesting. The fashion and outdoors photographers I know, and I hire
some every year, use Hasselblads, Nikons, and Canons. The architectual
photographers are using Hasselblads and 4x5's. I can't even recall the
last time I saw a working commercial photographer using an Olympus. Next
time you see a presidential "photo op," see if there are very many, if
any, Olympus cameras among the pros.

For a product like a professional SLR to "catch on," it has to have market
share. Among working photographers, what do you suppose the Olympus market
share is? No one out there is competing in a serious fashion with Nikon
and Canon.

I'm not knocking Olympus technology or quality. As I previously stated,
they make fine camera. When I state they haven't caught on, I mean market
share.

I see no reason to be iconoclastic when it comes to cameras. Nikons and
Canons are good enough for me.

When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store'
in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon
or Canon cameras.


All the more reason to get that Canon that Harry's wife uses. She's taken
some excellent shots with that camera. You could probably find a
refurbished one for $100.
--
John

Micro-four thirds...
 

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real
photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local
professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?

Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR
cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands
even come close in that market segment.

Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?

Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff?

How about it?


What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do
with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the
world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever
it was you were trying to say there?

You are an armchair expert. Either get out of the chair and prove your
capabilities or STFU.




My "capabilities" have nothing whatsoever to do with Tom's claim. Is
logical argument something you righties cannot fathom?

Micro-four thirds...
 

John wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:54:11 -0500, HK wrote:

Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
Well, I gone and dun it...

http://tinyurl.com/5wr2q3

Should be here on Friday.

Now I need to sell my 300 and 330 before Mrs. Wave finds out.

This could be a problem... :)
Those Olympic people won't be happy that you've deserted them.

Do you think the 4/3 system is a good compromise between full sized
SLRs and the tiny compact camera CMOS?
No. The original 4/3'rds didn't really catch on. There is no reason to
suspect the newly revised version will, either.
Where do you come up with this crap? Talk to fashion and outdoors
photographers sometime about what they use in reality - Canon or
Olympus E-1s and now E-3s.

Keep following the herd Harry - that's what you seem to be really good
at.

Moron.

Interesting. The fashion and outdoors photographers I know, and I hire
some every year, use Hasselblads, Nikons, and Canons. The architectual
photographers are using Hasselblads and 4x5's. I can't even recall the
last time I saw a working commercial photographer using an Olympus. Next
time you see a presidential "photo op," see if there are very many, if
any, Olympus cameras among the pros.

For a product like a professional SLR to "catch on," it has to have market
share. Among working photographers, what do you suppose the Olympus market
share is? No one out there is competing in a serious fashion with Nikon
and Canon.

I'm not knocking Olympus technology or quality. As I previously stated,
they make fine camera. When I state they haven't caught on, I mean market
share.

I see no reason to be iconoclastic when it comes to cameras. Nikons and
Canons are good enough for me.
When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store'
in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon
or Canon cameras.


All the more reason to get that Canon that Harry's wife uses. She's taken
some excellent shots with that camera. You could probably find a
refurbished one for $100.



Herring's second post of the day...and he's still sniffing up my butt.

Micro-four thirds...
 

Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo
store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals
use either Nikon or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?

Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR
cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands
even come close in that market segment.

Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?

Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff?

How about it?


What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do
with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the
world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it
was you were trying to say there?



We'd like to see if you are a decent photog. or just a poser.

Micro-four thirds...
 

On Dec 16, 4:15*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Well, I gone and dun it...

http://tinyurl.com/5wr2q3

Should be here on Friday.

Now I need to sell my 300 and 330 before Mrs. Wave finds out.

This could be a problem... * *:)

There's a great article on Olympus and Panasonics micro four thirds in
Modern Photography. Here's some stuff:
http://www.popphoto.com/photonews/54...nic-page2.html

Micro-four thirds...
 

Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real
photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local
professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?

Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade
SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other
brands even come close in that market segment.

Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?

Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff?

How about it?


What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do
with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the
world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever
it was you were trying to say there?

You are an armchair expert. Either get out of the chair and prove your
capabilities or STFU.




My "capabilities" have nothing whatsoever to do with Tom's claim. Is
logical argument something you righties cannot fathom?

Do you have capabilities or are you just a poser?