Micro-four thirds...
 

wrote:
On Dec 17, 12:20 pm, Jim wrote:
SmallBoats.com wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:
When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real
photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local
professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?
Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade
SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other
brands even come close in that market segment.
Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?
Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff?
How about it?
What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to
do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of
the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or
whatever it was you were trying to say there?
The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice
photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak
Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the
blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could
ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo.
I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree
stump we used for target practice?
You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do.
You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone
liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your
work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of?
Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard...;)
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------
His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or
something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails,
fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd
saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not to mention he is barely able to shoot over the railing on the
balcony.. Unless the fence is 6 feet tall, he is not only fat, but
short too.



Tell you what...you come on down here with a pile of money in your pocket.

I will give you $5000 cash for every inch I am shorter than 5'11" and
you will give me $5000 for every inch I am taller than 5'11". Bring
$10000 to $15000.

Put up or shut up, short****.

Micro-four thirds...
 

On Dec 17, 12:44*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 17, 12:20 pm, Jim wrote:
SmallBoats.com wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:
When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real
photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local
professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?
Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade
SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other
brands even come close in that market segment.
Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?
Gonna take me up on my offer? *See your best stuff?
How about it?
What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to
do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of
the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or
whatever it was you were trying to say there?
The camera does not make the photograph. *Some really nice
photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak
Brownie. *The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the
blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. *Who could
ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo.
I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree
stump we used for target practice?
You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do.
You have posted many photos in the past. *The only ones that anyone
liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your
work. *Why don't you post one photo you are proud of?
Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard...;)
-----------------
http://www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com-*C...tention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------
His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or
something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails,
fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd
saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not to mention he is barely able to shoot over the railing on the
balcony.. Unless the fence is 6 feet tall, he is not only fat, but
short too.

Tell you what...you come on down here with a pile of money in your pocket..

I will give you $5000 cash for every inch I am shorter than 5'11" and
you will give me $5000 for every inch I am taller than 5'11". Bring
$10000 to $15000.

Put up or shut up, short****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You can't be trusted. You've backed down on many many bets, wagers,
and proving alleged ownership of many things. If you're as high as you
are wide, you're probably right, fat slob.

Micro-four thirds...
 

On Dec 17, 12:20*pm, Jim wrote:
SmallBoats.com wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real
photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local
professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?

Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade
SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other
brands even come close in that market segment.

Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?

Gonna take me up on my offer? *See your best stuff?

How about it?

What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to
do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of
the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or
whatever it was you were trying to say there?

The camera does not make the photograph. *Some really nice
photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak
Brownie. *The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the
blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. *Who could
ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo.

I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree
stump we used for target practice?

You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do.

You have posted many photos in the past. *The only ones that anyone
liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your
work. *Why don't you post one photo you are proud of?

Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard...;)
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or
something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails,
fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd
saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

He also tried to claim he was there in some professional capacity.
THEN when it was revealed that he wasn't registered at that hotel, he
tried to claim it was a work partner. Come to find out, he just rode
in on his wife's coat tails.

Micro-four thirds...
 

On Dec 17, 12:44*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 17, 12:20 pm, Jim wrote:
SmallBoats.com wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:
When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real
photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local
professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?
Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade
SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other
brands even come close in that market segment.
Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?
Gonna take me up on my offer? *See your best stuff?
How about it?
What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to
do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of
the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or
whatever it was you were trying to say there?
The camera does not make the photograph. *Some really nice
photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak
Brownie. *The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the
blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. *Who could
ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo.
I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree
stump we used for target practice?
You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do.
You have posted many photos in the past. *The only ones that anyone
liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your
work. *Why don't you post one photo you are proud of?
Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard...;)
-----------------
http://www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com-*C...tention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------
His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or
something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails,
fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd
saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not to mention he is barely able to shoot over the railing on the
balcony.. Unless the fence is 6 feet tall, he is not only fat, but
short too.

Tell you what...you come on down here with a pile of money in your pocket..

I will give you $5000 cash for every inch I am shorter than 5'11" and
you will give me $5000 for every inch I am taller than 5'11". Bring
$10000 to $15000.

Put up or shut up, short****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Tell you what, what if we make it??? Since you also said I was weak
you come up here with a fistfull of money and I will give you $5000
for every lap more you can do than me on the Motocross track here
[ http://www.ctmotocross.com/Photos/07layout4.jpg ] and you give me
the same for every lap more I can do than you? I have access to almost
any configuration of MX ride you want. The Mouse would like to take
the same bet. She is14 yo, 5'3", and 110 lbs.. Warning, she is known
to ride for several hours straight at about 4.5 minutes per lap;) I
can't ride as long as her, but I am sure I could cover enough laps for
a couple years at a pretty good school;)

Put up or shut up;)

Micro-four thirds...
 

Jim wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 17, 12:20 pm, Jim wrote:
SmallBoats.com wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater

wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:
When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real
photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local
professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world
knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?
Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade
SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other
brands even come close in that market segment.
Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows
better"?
What does that mean, anyway?
Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff?
How about it?
What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to
do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of
the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or
whatever it was you were trying to say there?
The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice
photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak
Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the
blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could
ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo.
I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree
stump we used for target practice?
You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time.
I do.
You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone
liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your
work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of?
Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard...;)
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------
His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or
something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails,
fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd
saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not to mention he is barely able to shoot over the railing on the
balcony.. Unless the fence is 6 feet tall, he is not only fat, but
short too.

You have better recollection than I do. You didn't save the shot, by any
chance, did you?

pfffftttt.. no...
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

Micro-four thirds...
 

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:44:30 -0500, Boater
wrote:



Tell you what...you come on down here with a pile of money in your pocket.

I will give you $5000 cash for every inch I am shorter than 5'11" and
you will give me $5000 for every inch I am taller than 5'11". Bring
$10000 to $15000.

Put up or shut up, short****.

Just gotta say it's hard to believe I'm reading 2 grown men arguing
about their height.
Just gotta say it. Gotta. Just gotta.
It must be LSD flashbacks Gotta be. Just gotta be.

--Vic

Micro-four thirds...
 

On Dec 17, 1:19*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:44:30 -0500, Boater
wrote:



Tell you what...you come on down here with a pile of money in your pocket.

Micro-four thirds...
 

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:19:40 -0600, Vic Smith wrote:


Just gotta say it's hard to believe I'm reading 2 grown men arguing
about their height.
Just gotta say it. Gotta. Just gotta. It must be LSD flashbacks
Gotta be. Just gotta be.

--Vic

Who said they were grown men? ;-)

Micro-four thirds...
 

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:25:44 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

"arm pump"

Sounds like it could be dangerous.
http://www.thumpertalk.com/forum/arc.../t-151810.html

--Vic

Micro-four thirds...
 

wrote:
On Dec 17, 12:44 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 17, 12:20 pm, Jim wrote:
SmallBoats.com wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater
wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:
When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real
photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local
professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras.
That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows
better.
Where is that, Tom?
By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province?
Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade
SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other
brands even come close in that market segment.
Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"?
What does that mean, anyway?
Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff?
How about it?
What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to
do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of
the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or
whatever it was you were trying to say there?
The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice
photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak
Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the
blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could
ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo.
I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree
stump we used for target practice?
You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do.
You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone
liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your
work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of?
Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard...;)
-----------------
http://www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com-*C...tention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------
His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or
something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails,
fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd
saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not to mention he is barely able to shoot over the railing on the
balcony.. Unless the fence is 6 feet tall, he is not only fat, but
short too.
Tell you what...you come on down here with a pile of money in your pocket.

I will give you $5000 cash for every inch I am shorter than 5'11" and
you will give me $5000 for every inch I am taller than 5'11". Bring
$10000 to $15000.

Put up or shut up, short****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Tell you what, what if we make it??? Since you also said I was weak
you come up here with a fistfull of money and I will give you $5000
for every lap more you can do than me on the Motocross track here
[ http://www.ctmotocross.com/Photos/07layout4.jpg ] and you give me
the same for every lap more I can do than you? I have access to almost
any configuration of MX ride you want. The Mouse would like to take
the same bet. She is14 yo, 5'3", and 110 lbs.. Warning, she is known
to ride for several hours straight at about 4.5 minutes per lap;) I
can't ride as long as her, but I am sure I could cover enough laps for
a couple years at a pretty good school;)

Put up or shut up;)


Uh, while I can ride a motorcycle, I've not made any claims to being a
motorcross track rider. You're the one who keeps claiming I am short.
Here's your chance to prove you are right or just full of ****.

I figured you had no balls. Most short little ****s like you never have
them.