On Dec 7, 11:33*am, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 7, 1:21 am, "CRM" wrote:
wrote in message

....

I dunno, it looks like it has a pretty short barrel so unless someone
is a pretty good shot, my understanding is that a weapon like this is
not good for anything beyond a few feet.
-----------------------------------------------

Here's a grouping free hand at 25 yards (75 feet for you backwoodsers)http://www.dezendorf.us/photos/M2801.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
*Hard to handle too I would imagine, must have a hell of a muzzle lift
--------------------------------------------------------------------

For a little guy, maybe.

------------------------------------------------------------------
*but again, I don't know from firearms...
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Then why not STFU?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
And unlike my new troll CRM, I was not trying to pick
a fight, but you already knew that...
----------------------------------------------------------------

Why should he "know" that?

---------------------------------------------------------------
*I am just a tool ........
---------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------
I just thought other weapons would be better.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Why? You already said you know nothing about firearms.

Wow, you are a nice little troll... *you are dismissed, now crawl back
under your desk and get back to your google brains..

Since you admit you know nothing about guns, why are you so obstreperous
when someone points out that you said.

You know nothing about guns.

Therefore your opinions about what might be good, bad or indifferent
handguns...amount to a pile of cold dogturds.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Never said I knew "nothing" about guns.. I know in most cases a longer
barrel is more accurate and I have a pretty good understanding about
why. Like John said, I asked a perfectly acceptable question, you and
your new buddy are the only ones who are not smart enough or honest
enough to address it. Either way, if you can't answer simple
questions, maybe you shouldn't ge involved in discussion groups. As to
my new troll, pfffftttt... Funny how the biggest cowards always go
after folks they think pose no threat, and still do if from under a
desk on the internet...

wrote:
On Dec 7, 11:33 am, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 7, 1:21 am, "CRM" wrote:
wrote in message
...
I dunno, it looks like it has a pretty short barrel so unless someone
is a pretty good shot, my understanding is that a weapon like this is
not good for anything beyond a few feet.
-----------------------------------------------
Here's a grouping free hand at 25 yards (75 feet for you backwoodsers)http://www.dezendorf.us/photos/M2801.jpg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Hard to handle too I would imagine, must have a hell of a muzzle lift
--------------------------------------------------------------------
For a little guy, maybe.
------------------------------------------------------------------
but again, I don't know from firearms...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Then why not STFU?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
And unlike my new troll CRM, I was not trying to pick
a fight, but you already knew that...
----------------------------------------------------------------
Why should he "know" that?
---------------------------------------------------------------
I am just a tool ........
---------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
I just thought other weapons would be better.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Why? You already said you know nothing about firearms.
Wow, you are a nice little troll... you are dismissed, now crawl back
under your desk and get back to your google brains..
Since you admit you know nothing about guns, why are you so obstreperous
when someone points out that you said.

You know nothing about guns.

Therefore your opinions about what might be good, bad or indifferent
handguns...amount to a pile of cold dogturds.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Never said I knew "nothing" about guns.. I know in most cases a longer
barrel is more accurate

Actually, in most circumstances, a longer barrel is not practically more
accurate. I don't mean you should compare a 2" snubby to a 6" barrel,
but the differences in accuracy at standard distances between most 4"
and 5" or 5" or 6" barrel are not important. If you can put six in the
bullseye with a 6" barrel revolver at seven yards, you're going to be
able to do it with a similar handgun with a 5" or even 4" barrel.

A longer barrel can improve velocity, sometimes.

This is been tested many times.