Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Eisboch, SW Tom...!!!
On Nov 25, 11:25*am, Boater wrote:
D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... wrote: Would one of you please put this question into a form that even Harry can understand so we can get an answer? Apparently the Elite left has lost so much touch with the middle class in America, they don't even speak English anymore.. Thank you, I am sure others are interested in this issue. Here is the question in English: Just watching CNN. Robert Reich is saying the secret ballot makes it possible for companies to intimidate workers?? *Can you explain how not knowing how someone votes can create intimidation, and going to their homes, with their wives and children home with a ballot and asking them to check off a box in front of union thugs doesn't ?? Thanks, Just Wait... The problem is, you simply do not understand what Reich was alluding to...it wasn't the ballot itself, but what happens in the intimidating processes perpetrated by employers leading up to the vote. Employers will do whatever they can to chill the pro-union vote, even when there are more than enough cards to secure an election. I must say, I've gotten a kick over the years of the anti-unionism expressed here by guys who couldn't qualify as an apprentice to most union workers. Why can't the secret vote be taken in a much more timely manor? Without getting into a presentation of a dissertation, let me just say that in the last eight years the Bush Admin has stacked the deck against unions in terms of union elections, decerts, allowing employer intimidation, employer delays and packing the NLRB courts. Some of that will change with the new administration, and if it does, and the playing field is fairer, there will be less call for card certifications. In recent years, a favorite tactic of employers has been to refuse to negotiate in good faith, even after a union has won a rep election. If you are interested in the subject, there's a decent synopsis here under union busting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_busting I must say, I am much more a fan of the old-fashioned school of union organizing. What happens today is far too "white collar-ish" for my taste..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets you have answered nothing... |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Eisboch, SW Tom...!!!
On Nov 25, 10:45*am, Boater wrote:
wrote: Would one of you please put this question into a form that even Harry can understand so we can get an answer? Apparently the Elite left has lost so much touch with the middle class in America, they don't even speak English anymore.. Thank you, I am sure others are interested in this issue. Here is the question in English: Just watching CNN. Robert Reich is saying the secret ballot makes it possible for companies to intimidate workers?? *Can you explain how not knowing how someone votes can create intimidation, and going to their homes, with their wives and children home with a ballot and asking them to check off a box in front of union thugs doesn't ?? Thanks, Just Wait... The problem is, you simply do not understand what Reich was alluding to...it wasn't the ballot itself, but what happens in the intimidating processes perpetrated by employers leading up to the vote. Employers will do whatever they can to chill the pro-union vote, even when there are more than enough cards to secure an election. Of course the employers don't want the union to get established. Why would anyone want to suffer the same fate as the Big 3 automakers are, having been sucked dry by the UAW? It's funny to hear the pro-union trash on this NG whine about intimidation. That's exactly how unions exist... through intimidation. "Give us another raise and increase our benefits, or we go on strike!" |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Eisboch, SW Tom...!!!
wrote in message ... Of course the employers don't want the union to get established. Why would anyone want to suffer the same fate as the Big 3 automakers are, having been sucked dry by the UAW? It's funny to hear the pro-union trash on this NG whine about intimidation. That's exactly how unions exist... through intimidation. "Give us another raise and increase our benefits, or we go on strike!" ************************************************** *********** You best stick to something you know...such as pleasuring the 'palm sisters'. In the last number of years where I worked, it was about continual concessions.. one way of course with the unions on the losing end. In the background ...always threats the location could be downsized. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Eisboch, SW Tom...!!!
On Nov 25, 11:35*am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message ... Of course the employers don't want the union to get established. *Why would anyone want to suffer the same fate as the Big 3 automakers are, having been sucked dry by the UAW? It's funny to hear the pro-union trash on this NG whine about intimidation. *That's exactly how unions exist... through intimidation. *"Give us another raise and increase our benefits, or we go on strike!" ************************************************** *********** You best stick to something you know...such as pleasuring the 'palm sisters'. In the last number of years where I worked, it was about continual concessions.. one way of course with the unions on the losing end. *In the background ...always threats the location could be downsized. Yeah, and who pushed the concessions votes? Probably your union business agent who is soundly in the pocket of management |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Eisboch, SW Tom...!!!
wrote in message ... On Nov 25, 11:35 am, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message ... Of course the employers don't want the union to get established. Why would anyone want to suffer the same fate as the Big 3 automakers are, having been sucked dry by the UAW? It's funny to hear the pro-union trash on this NG whine about intimidation. That's exactly how unions exist... through intimidation. "Give us another raise and increase our benefits, or we go on strike!" ************************************************** *********** You best stick to something you know...such as pleasuring the 'palm sisters'. In the last number of years where I worked, it was about continual concessions.. one way of course with the unions on the losing end. In the background ...always threats the location could be downsized. Yeah, and who pushed the concessions votes? Probably your union business agent who is soundly in the pocket of management ************************************************** *** Naw, our leaders were working in our best interests. Our biggest problem was providing a service in a competitive environment. We weren't the only game in town and the Crown Corp could go on forever on the billion dollars of taxpayer money received every year. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Eisboch, SW Tom...!!!
"Don White" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... Of course the employers don't want the union to get established. Why would anyone want to suffer the same fate as the Big 3 automakers are, having been sucked dry by the UAW? It's funny to hear the pro-union trash on this NG whine about intimidation. That's exactly how unions exist... through intimidation. "Give us another raise and increase our benefits, or we go on strike!" ************************************************** *********** You best stick to something you know...such as pleasuring the 'palm sisters'. In the last number of years where I worked, it was about continual concessions.. one way of course with the unions on the losing end. In the background ...always threats the location could be downsized. I don't know about recent years, but in the 70s/80s when I was corresponding with the Canadian resident it seemed like the Canadian postal service was always on strike. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Eisboch, SW Tom...!!!
"D.Duck" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... Of course the employers don't want the union to get established. Why would anyone want to suffer the same fate as the Big 3 automakers are, having been sucked dry by the UAW? It's funny to hear the pro-union trash on this NG whine about intimidation. That's exactly how unions exist... through intimidation. "Give us another raise and increase our benefits, or we go on strike!" ************************************************** *********** You best stick to something you know...such as pleasuring the 'palm sisters'. In the last number of years where I worked, it was about continual concessions.. one way of course with the unions on the losing end. In the background ...always threats the location could be downsized. I don't know about recent years, but in the 70s/80s when I was corresponding with the Canadian resident it seemed like the Canadian postal service was always on strike. The Post Office went through a rough time. Bosses used to fill the lower management ranks with retired military types. They wanted hard nosed yes men to use against the union rank & file. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Eisboch, SW Tom...!!!
On Nov 25, 11:35*am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message ... Of course the employers don't want the union to get established. *Why would anyone want to suffer the same fate as the Big 3 automakers are, having been sucked dry by the UAW? It's funny to hear the pro-union trash on this NG whine about intimidation. *That's exactly how unions exist... through intimidation. *"Give us another raise and increase our benefits, or we go on strike!" ************************************************** *********** You best stick to something you know...such as pleasuring the 'palm sisters'. In the last number of years where I worked, it was about continual concessions.. one way of course with the unions on the losing end. *In the background ...always threats the location could be downsized. Your story isn't relevant... I'm sure you worked someplace "special". But do tell, Don... did you ever participate in a walk-out, a work slowdown, or a strike? Did your union ever demand something and tell the company if they didn't get it, they'd strike? You know, did they use intimidation? Probably not. You were a member of the puss union. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Eisboch, SW Tom...!!!
wrote in message ... On Nov 25, 11:35 am, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message ... Of course the employers don't want the union to get established. Why would anyone want to suffer the same fate as the Big 3 automakers are, having been sucked dry by the UAW? It's funny to hear the pro-union trash on this NG whine about intimidation. That's exactly how unions exist... through intimidation. "Give us another raise and increase our benefits, or we go on strike!" ************************************************** *********** You best stick to something you know...such as pleasuring the 'palm sisters'. In the last number of years where I worked, it was about continual concessions.. one way of course with the unions on the losing end. In the background ...always threats the location could be downsized. Your story isn't relevant... I'm sure you worked someplace "special". But do tell, Don... did you ever participate in a walk-out, a work slowdown, or a strike? Did your union ever demand something and tell the company if they didn't get it, they'd strike? You know, did they use intimidation? Probably not. You were a member of the puss union. ************************************************** **** One year, we refused their usual demands to weaken our contract and they 'locked us out'. Yours truly handled the 'strike pay' I have a hammed-up picture somewhere of the female vice president on her knees begging for money while I play scrooge, with wads of $20 bills falling out of every pocket I had. Life on the actual line got tedius after 3 weeks...and of course it was winter. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Eisboch, SW Tom...!!!
It's funny to hear the pro-union trash on this NG whine about intimidation. That's exactly how unions exist... through intimidation. "Give us another raise and increase our benefits, or we go on strike!" Well, you get the Electric Company, the Gas Company, and the Taxes to go DOWN 13%....and I'll TAKE the wage concession...till then...go **** yourself. The Poster sounds like a middle-management loser........ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yo!! Eisboch... | General | |||
Hey Eisboch... | General | |||
Hey Eisboch... | General | |||
Eisboch... | General |