Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Glenn Ashmore" wrote in news:7E3uh.99531$jb3.54907
@newsfe18.lga: Any idea why there is still a separate rule for Advanced when they no longer exist? Advanced Class licenses still exist and I think they are still being renewed to current holders, last time I checked.... Ham radio has always resisted any changes to the status quo, especially the ARRL who has always wanted to turn back the clock to 1939. They fought against AM, SSB, RTTY, Packet and every digital mode. Then they fought to preserve prime frequency territories for the old fart Extras who never took a test in the first place, but happened to be born into it. I'm old enough to remember them fighting Wayne Green (73 Magazine's founder) over RTTY, trying to restrict it so much as to be useless. FCC has gotten a dose of its own testosterone, of late, mostly from Riley Hollingsworth. He gave a speech at our Charleston Hamfest a couple years back, which was excellent. After the speech, he hung around, jealously guarded by an ARRL official all dressed up to look like someone important. I shook his hand and asked him, "Is this your ARRL handler?", pointing to the suit next to him. The look on the ARRL suit's face was one of shock. Any time an FCC official comes to a hamfest, ARRL is right there to try to make sure he thinks ARRL is the official voice of all hams, which might have been true many decades ago, but is not for the last decades. FCC knows that and tries to do what it can to preserve ham radio, lately, ESPECIALLY eliminating this 1939 Morse Code nonsense they should have dumped in 1955...before I was forced to learn it for no reason at all... I never said code should be eliminated from ham radio. Those that love code should be allowed to live in the 30's and use it. However, as code has always been used as a phone band jamming device since the first AM station started transmitting, I have always promoted the idea it be CONFINED to the code-only part of the bands. Code has no place in the phone bands, except as a jamming device of some jealous *******s. I just hope it's not too late to save ham radio from its death of old age and ARRL's reticence. Go to any hamfest and guess the average age of the total attendees. My guess is now in the low 60's, where I am. Few kids are interested. They have full duplex video conferencing in their bedrooms on serious broadband with the whole world at their keyboard. What the hell do they need some ancient form of communications for, populated by an bunch of really nasty old *******s that bitch at them using "their frequencies" just because they've had some totally unnecessary traffic net on it for the last 60 years. Saving ham radio may depend of waiting for death to free up HF for a newer generation. Unfortunately, the newer generation could care less, having moved on to better technology. Oops...got a Skype call coming in from Guam. Who needs ham radio? Ah, boaters...right. Larry -- Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner. Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
Other choice and counterpoise question | Electronics | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | Boat Building | |||
Sunday's VHF antics.....and a question.. | Electronics |