Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt John wrote:
chuck wrote: Larry wrote: "Capt John" wrote in news:1153072859.862252.17460 @p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com: Also, if it's not CG approved, and you have a fire because of it, your insurance company is going to walk away, it's your problem. I'd stick with the normal marine alternator if I was you. I think THAT is a very important point, too.... Doesn't the CG requirement kick in only for gasoline engines? I doubt the insurance company could walk if the engine is diesel. Chuck The CG requirement is for diesel as well, diesel fuel burns quite well. Cracked high pressure diesel fuel lines can produce a very fine fuel mist, and it makes for one hell of a fire if it hits a spark or a hot dry turbo. Give an insurance company an excuse to walk away from paying on a loss and watch how fast they run. That's what they pay their people to do. I looked quickly at my Cat alternator part numbers, they look like differant part numbers than the truck numbers in the catalog. It just isn't worth it. Capt. John, I'd really like to see a cite for the specific USCG regulation that requires ignition-protected alternators on diesel engines. 33 CFR 183.410 addresses only gasoline, and even then gives a pass if the gasoline is on the other side of a bulkhead, etc. Here is the applicability paragraph (183.401) for ignition protection: (a) This subpart applies to all boats that have gasoline engines, except outboard engines, for electrical generation, mechanical power, or propulsion. FWIW, I'm not advocating anything and am making no judgment here on what is and isn't worth it. I'm simply seeking clarification on what the regs actually say. Chuck ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |